Documentaries & Articles for Discussion

[Brietta]

No, wrong again, you are USING Tannerman as the abductor at 9.15... This has ZILCH to do with the mother's immediate reaction, and NOTHING to do with search parties,  carry on trying.

Had the abductor exited the apartment five minutes prior to Madeleine's absence being discovered what I have said remains the same.

The empty apartments in the immediate vicinity were not visited on the night, she could have been in any one.
The occupied apartments in the immediate vicinity were not visited on the night, she could have been in any one.

Madeleine's mother's reaction ... which was not immediate ... she had checked the apartment for occupancy ... was in my opinion (I take it I still may have an opinion?) ... the speediest one in the circumstances.

There are ways of saying you disagree with that without resorting to goading or abuse ... if you have a valid argument which it appears you don't.

[stephen25000]

If I knew what you were saying I might take issue ... I believe one can Google translations in Klingon etc ... is that what you did?

Not quite. £5%4%

[stephen25000]

Had the abductor exited the apartment five minutes prior to Madeleine's absence being discovered what I have said remains the same.

The empty apartments in the immediate vicinity were not visited on the night, she could have been in any one.
The occupied apartments in the immediate vicinity were not visited on the night, she could have been in any one.

Madeleine's mother's reaction ... which was not immediate ... she had checked the apartment for occupancy ... was in my opinion (I take it I still may have an opinion?) ... the speediest one in the circumstances.

There are ways of saying you disagree with that without resorting to goading or abuse ... if you have a valid argument which it appears you don't.

What abductor ?

[Brietta]

No, the mother had NO idea whatsoever and couldnt have done if an abductior was around, so my argument is solid yours is flakey, BIG RED FLAG......massive one....no spin can ever discredit this red flag... have to go, have fun trying to excuse every action

Hmmmm ... there are appropriate ways of presenting an argument which involves neither goading or abuse ... it seems you haven't quite mastered the technique.

[mercury]

Hmmmm ... there are appropriate ways of presenting an argument which involves neither goading or abuse ... it seems you haven't quite mastered the technique.

It would help you if you stuck to the facts

[mercury]

Had the abductor exited the apartment five minutes prior to Madeleine's absence being discovered what I have said remains the same.

The empty apartments in the immediate vicinity were not visited on the night, she could have been in any one.
The occupied apartments in the immediate vicinity were not visited on the night, she could have been in any one.

Madeleine's mother's reaction ... which was not immediate ... she had checked the apartment for occupancy ... was in my opinion (I take it I still may have an opinion?) ... the speediest one in the circumstances.

There are ways of saying you disagree with that without resorting to goading or abuse ... if you have a valid argument which it appears you don't.

Had the abductor exited the apartment five minutes prior to Madeleine's absence being discovered what I have said remains the same.

The empty apartments in the immediate vicinity were not visited on the night, she could have been in any one.
The occupied apartments in the immediate vicinity were not visited on the night, she could have been in any one.

Madeleine's mother's reaction ... which was not immediate ... she had checked the apartment for occupancy ... was in my opinion (I take it I still may have an opinion?) ... the speediest one in the circumstances.

There are ways of saying you disagree with that without resorting to goading or abuse ... if you have a valid argument which it appears you don't.

No, the mother had NO idea whatsoever and couldnt have done if an abductior was around, so my argument is solid yours is flakey, BIG RED FLAG......massive one....no spin can ever discredit this red flag... have to go, have fun trying to excuse every action...and if kate mccnn feels she has a licence to throwing aspersions against nannies and cooks and others drugging madeleine
we have licence to throw aspersions at her for the same!!!!

[Brietta]

It would help you if you stuck to the facts

Nothing I say or do is responsible for your behaviour.  That is a matter entirely for you.

[misty]

No, the mother had NO idea whatsoever and couldnt have done if an abductior was around, so my argument is solid yours is flakey, BIG RED FLAG......massive one....no spin can ever discredit this red flag... have to go, have fun trying to excuse every action

Precisely. The abductor(s) could have been next door in the Oldfield apartment attempting to take their daughter  too, whilst Kate struggled to haul 2 sleepy 2 year olds out of travel cots, through doors, a safety gate, down a flight of steps, down a hill, in through the Tapas reception door and, all the while, Madeleine was also missing.

[mercury]

Precisely. The abductor(s) could have been next door in the Oldfield apartment attempting to take their daughter  too, whilst Kate struggled to haul 2 sleepy 2 year olds out of travel cots, through doors, a safety gate, down a flight of steps, down a hill, in through the Tapas reception door and, all the while, Madeleine was also missing.

Which makes it all the more inportang that she did NOT leave her remaining kids to be ptentially abducted too, you are just not for real

See ya now my taxis here!!! Enjoy your dervish evening

[slartibartfast]

Precisely. The abductor(s) could have been next door in the Oldfield apartment attempting to take their daughter  too, whilst Kate struggled to haul 2 sleepy 2 year olds out of travel cots, through doors, a safety gate, down a flight of steps, down a hill, in through the Tapas reception door and, all the while, Madeleine was also missing.

I think there seems to be general acceptance that the apartment was out of sight and out of hearing...?

[Miss Taken Identity]

Had the abductor exited the apartment five minutes prior to Madeleine's absence being discovered what I have said remains the same.

The empty apartments in the immediate vicinity were not visited on the night, she could have been in any one.
The occupied apartments in the immediate vicinity were not visited on the night, she could have been in any one.

Madeleine's mother's reaction ... which was not immediate ... she had checked the apartment for occupancy ... was in my opinion (I take it I still may have an opinion?) ... the speediest one in the circumstances.

There are ways of saying you disagree with that without resorting to goading or abuse ... if you have a valid argument which it appears you don't.

My valid argument would be; Kate saying on many, many  interviews, including the clucking one, She knew RIGHT AWAY maddie had been taken due to a door being more open that it should have been and on closing it a whooshing.. blah blah  blah but ofcourse you could be correct, but that would make Kate a liar  ooh now, now be careful.

 She also knew Maddie could not have walked an wandered because- well because people would  perhaps hate her for an eternity for leaving her children alone to be?....[place your theorem here]

[Brietta]

I think there seems to be general acceptance that the apartment was out of sight and out of hearing...?

General acceptance of whom?

[Brietta]

My valid argument would be; Kate saying on many, many  interviews, including the clucking one, She knew RIGHT AWAY maddie had been taken due to a door being more open that it should have been and on closing it a whooshing.. blah blah  blah but ofcourse you could be correct, but that would make Kate a liar  ooh now, now be careful.

 She also knew Maddie could not have walked an wandered because- well because people would  perhaps hate her for an eternity for leaving her children alone to be?....[place your theorem here]

Obviously "the clucking one" has some significance somewhere ... I haven't a clue what you are on about.

[slartibartfast]

General acceptance of whom?

Well the supporters seem to think that shouting from the patio wasn't a realistic option.

[Miss Taken Identity]

General acceptance of whom?

Oh any ole detective who bothered to check.

So,  if you are saying this is not generally accepted then can you explain how an abductor got in and out if the parents could see and hear their children from where they were sitting....oh take your time to reply.

So the caring parents couldn't hear the childen crying the night before,  Maddie mentioned that to them? oh had you forgotten that bit? ah well never mind, it's only a story.


And why did thy have to go and check anyway if they could se and hear them... someone didn't think this through.