Documentaries & Articles for Discussion

[slartibartfast]

What's the contradiction?

Dining "in the back Garden" and running back to start the search rather than shout.

[Alfred R Jones]

Dining "in the back Garden" and running back to start the search rather than shout.

How is that a contradiction?

[Brietta]

Yet again.

No independent confirmation the window was open before 10 pm.

The only identified fingerprints are hers.

Hardly surprising Dr Mccann's fingerprints are on the window glass ... she did after all look out of it.

Don't you ever tire of repetition?  I'm certainly less than impressed with your inability to further any sort of discussion in response to a post.  That is taking a point and expanding on it or making cogent argument where you may differ on it.

Perhaps now is time to call a halt to responding to my posts since you have said it all so many, many, many, many times before that one is led to suppose you are incapable of doing otherwise.

So why don't we take it as read that you are going to repeat exactly the same firmly held prejudices with the only variety the order of the rotation ... that will save you boring yourself with repetition, save bandwidth and save me the bother of mouthing the phrases from you that I already know so well by heart.

[slartibartfast]

Hardly surprising Dr Mccann's fingerprints are on the window glass ... she did after all look out of it.

Don't you ever tire of repetition?  I'm certainly less than impressed with your inability to further any sort of discussion in response to a post.  That is taking a point and expanding on it or making cogent argument where you may differ on it.

Perhaps now is time to call a halt to responding to my posts since you have said it all so many, many, many, many times before that one is led to suppose you are incapable of doing otherwise.

So why don't we take it as read that you are going to repeat exactly the same firmly held prejudices with the only variety the order of the rotation ... that will save you boring yourself with repetition, save bandwidth and save me the bother of mouthing the phrases from you that I already know so well by heart.

As I say to the Grandkids, you look with your eyes.

[Brietta]

As I say to the Grandkids, you look with your eyes.

I take it that is in reference to Dr McCann's fingerprints on the window glass?
The only way she could "look with her eyes" was to lean out of the window to check, probably in the first instance, to see if Madeleine had somehow got out that way and was in sight.

[stephen25000]

Hardly surprising Dr Mccann's fingerprints are on the window glass ... she did after all look out of it.

Don't you ever tire of repetition?  I'm certainly less than impressed with your inability to further any sort of discussion in response to a post.  That is taking a point and expanding on it or making cogent argument where you may differ on it.

Perhaps now is time to call a halt to responding to my posts since you have said it all so many, many, many, many times before that one is led to suppose you are incapable of doing otherwise.

So why don't we take it as read that you are going to repeat exactly the same firmly held prejudices with the only variety the order of the rotation ... that will save you boring yourself with repetition, save bandwidth and save me the bother of mouthing the phrases from you that I already know so well by heart.

The repetition is you and your fellows spouting abduction, without a shred of evidence.

So when it comes to BORING this forum with endless repetition of drivel, learn from your own preaching.

It's about time you did.

As to predujices, they spout from each time you type.

[ferryman]

What's the contradiction?

Don't ask complicated questions, Alfred ...

[Mr Gray]

The repetition is you and your fellows spouting abduction, without a shred of evidence.

So when it comes to BORING this forum with endless repetition of drivel, learn from your own preaching.

It's about time you did.

As to predujices, they spout from each time you type.

plenty of evidence to support abduction

[Brietta]

The repetition is you and your fellows spouting abduction, without a shred of evidence.

So when it comes to BORING this forum with endless repetition of drivel, learn from your own preaching.

It's about time you did.

As to predujices, they spout from each time you type.

As tiresome as the repetition of your posting is the ad hominem attacks are just as much so. 

If you wish to be in denial of what is the current thinking on Madeleine's case that is your concern.
Most of the rest of the world has progressed from the discredited theory of a discredited detective and are hopeful of the positive resolution wished for by most caring people.

**Snip
Redwood and his 37-strong team have identified 195 missed investigative opportunities in the 40,000 pieces of evidence they have examined from the Portuguese inquiry, the family's home force in Leicestershire, and the information gleaned by a team of private detectives hired by the McCann family since Madeleine went missing, aged three, from the resort of Praia de Luz on 3 May 2007.

"We are in a unique position seeking to draw together the three key strands of information about her disappearance," said Redwood.

He unequivocally dismissed the conspiracy theory – promoted by the original Portuguese lead detective Goncalo Amaral – that Madeleine's parents had anything to do with her disappearance.

He said detectives believe Madeleine was abducted in "a criminal act by a stranger".

http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2012/apr/25/madeleine-mccann-yard-case

[jassi]

As tiresome as the repetition of your posting is the ad hominem attacks are just as much so. 

If you wish to be in denial of what is the current thinking on Madeleine's case that is your concern.
Most of the rest of the world has progressed from the discredited theory of a discredited detective and are hopeful of the positive resolution wished for by most caring people.

**Snip
Redwood and his 37-strong team have identified 195 missed investigative opportunities in the 40,000 pieces of evidence they have examined from the Portuguese inquiry, the family's home force in Leicestershire, and the information gleaned by a team of private detectives hired by the McCann family since Madeleine went missing, aged three, from the resort of Praia de Luz on 3 May 2007.

"We are in a unique position seeking to draw together the three key strands of information about her disappearance," said Redwood.

He unequivocally dismissed the conspiracy theory – promoted by the original Portuguese lead detective Goncalo Amaral – that Madeleine's parents had anything to do with her disappearance.

He said detectives believe Madeleine was abducted in "a criminal act by a stranger".

http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2012/apr/25/madeleine-mccann-yard-case

He might have believed that, but he certainly hasn't been able to prove it.

[stephen25000]

As tiresome as the repetition of your posting is the ad hominem attacks are just as much so. 

If you wish to be in denial of what is the current thinking on Madeleine's case that is your concern.
Most of the rest of the world has progressed from the discredited theory of a discredited detective and are hopeful of the positive resolution wished for by most caring people.

**Snip
Redwood and his 37-strong team have identified 195 missed investigative opportunities in the 40,000 pieces of evidence they have examined from the Portuguese inquiry, the family's home force in Leicestershire, and the information gleaned by a team of private detectives hired by the McCann family since Madeleine went missing, aged three, from the resort of Praia de Luz on 3 May 2007.

"We are in a unique position seeking to draw together the three key strands of information about her disappearance," said Redwood.

He unequivocally dismissed the conspiracy theory – promoted by the original Portuguese lead detective Goncalo Amaral – that Madeleine's parents had anything to do with her disappearance.

He said detectives believe Madeleine was abducted in "a criminal act by a stranger".

http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2012/apr/25/madeleine-mccann-yard-case

Hypocrite.

You made a personal attack on me. %&5%£

As to the rest of your copying and pasting, we have seen it all before.

THEY HAVE FOUND NOTHING.

Maybe one day you will realize that.

[Mr Gray]

He might have believed that, but he certainly hasn't been able to prove it.

he doesn't have to

[stephen25000]

he doesn't have to

Redwood's thoughts are now irrelevant.

[jassi]

he doesn't have to

What ?  He was the lead detective. It was his job to discover who took Madeleine away.

[Mr Gray]

What ?  He was the lead detective. It was his job to discover who took Madeleine away.

so was amarals.....it's now up to Hall...she doesn't have to...she will certainly do her best