The defense hired an expert to examine the blood evidence and to examine the moderator. That expert was not used at trial because that expert agreed with the prosecution and also found miscroscopic traces of blood on the first 8 baffles which he determined to be group A blood. Your claimt he defense did nothing is not int he least bit true you jsut keep demonstrating your bias makes you ignore relaity.
I assume you are referring to Dr Lincoln? If so he had nothing whatsoever to do with ballistics. The defence sent Dr Lincoln to FSS to discuss the blood testing and results with Mr Hayward at the FSS. He examined the silencer only insofar as examining it for blood. I assume Dr Lincoln was a biologist.
The DNA tests were done even though the defense knew fromt he outset the results would be worthless because AT MOST a test of the moderator could demonstrate whose blood reained in the mdoerator after the testing by the defense and prosecution labs it would not be able to demonstrate whose blood was removed by the prosecution and defense labs in 1985 and 1986. But the moderator tested negative for blood so the DNA tests could not even establish anoyone's blood was present in the mdoerator in 2002. The DNA tests were always just an exercise meant to try to fool the courts and public into thinking Jerey was innocent though it never had any ability to prove such.
As per usual you are completely wrong in your assertions. LCN DNA is not capable of identifying the source of biological material eg blood, sweat, semen etc.
I have no idea whose idea it was to carry out the LCN DNA. It was a fruitless exercise as even if it had shown SC's DNA was definitely in the silencer it would not have been able to show how it came to be there. You do realise that the CCRC thought there was enough merit in it to refer it to the COA? All it has done is add another layer of confusion and complexity. It was written off by all the scientists and appeal court judges as "utterly meaningless" and I agree with their findings.
The defense failed to find anyone who could refute that blood would be able to get in the moderator through drawback and to be distributed in the matter found and still hasn't been able to find anyone let alone one that can cite new science. You have failed to find anyone either you just have decided you don't want to believe it and that's that. Deciding you don't want to believe it though you have zero evidence to establish it just means you choose to live in denial.
For the last time, hopefully, the defence have never attempted to refute the blood and silencer evidence. Lol so its my job now to source expert witnesses and overturn JB's conviction?
One more time Scip. A small calibre weapon used in conjunction with low velocity bullets and a silencer is UNLIKELY to result in draw-back. Not only is draw-back UNLIKELY but it is EXTREMELY UNLIKELY that the blood would have located and distributed the way in which it was found when it arrived at FSS. To date no firearms reconstruction has taken place.
Plus you do realise that once blood leaves a body it degrades quickly? It needs to be stored at 4C. During August in the UK the average minimum temperature is 11.5C with the average maximum temperature 20.7C.
"Storage and transfer of whole blood samples
Samples should be refrigerated to 4°C immediately after collection. They can also be shipped in refrigerated packaging at 4°C. At that temperature they are stable for 7 days. If it is anticipated that analysis can not occur within 7 days, samples should be frozen immediately at -70°C (-20°C is not sufficient)". http://www.thl.fi/publications/ehrm/product2/part_iii4.htmIf the blood in the silencer was there as a result of draw-back (early hours Wed 7th August), found by the relatives on Saturday 8th August and handed to DS Jones during the evening on Mon 12th August; this would mean the silencer was at ambient temperature for at least some 5 days by which time the blood would have degraded and been incapable of producing the blood test/group results.
Why do you think we have full readings for the victims as follows:
ABO PGM EAP AK Hp
Nevill Bamber O PGM1+ EAP BA AK1 Hp2-1
June Bamber A PGM1+ EAP BA AK2-1 Hp2-1
Daniel Caffell O PGM2+1+ EAP B AK1 Hp2
Nicholas Caffell O PGM2+1+ EAP B AK1 Hp2
Sheila Caffell A PGM1+ EAP BA AK1 Hp2-1
Blood Sample A Nil EAP BA AK1 Hp2-1
Reason is that Dr Vanezis withdrew the blood from the victims and placed them in appropriate containers and storage facilities to ensure they were kept at the correct temperature. They were then handed to EP in a medi-carrier to regulate the temperature and then placed in the refrigerator at EP HQ Chelmsford.
You will be aware that a number of exhibits were tested in an attempt to determine whose blood was on them: carpet samples, wallpaper and rifle. These exhibits were only capable of providing limited results: human blood and ABO groupings. The reason for this is that the blood had already degraded from over exposure to ambient temperature by the time they were analysed. The only exhibit capable of blood group/type readings was the silencer as EP dobbed some blood from SC's sample in it. Note the hand-over at the top of the page in the following:
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=204.0;attach=704DEVIANT indeed! Otherwise known as noble cause corruption
