Author Topic: Madeleine McCann's parents win €500k in damages against former police chief.  (Read 165347 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Lyall

  • Guest
Looks like amaral's gofundme page has been banned.... @)(++(*...not having the best of times is he

Where there's a will, there's a way %£&)**#

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Looks like amaral's gofundme page has been banned.... @)(++(*...not having the best of times is he
Why was it banned, do you know?

Offline Mr Gray

Why was it banned, do you know?



I did find this


•Content associated with hate groups or terrorist organizations


•Campaigns including inflammatory or accusatory statements



https://www.gofundme.com/terms.




Take your pick

Offline faithlilly

Why was it banned, do you know?

I believe it was reported. Are the faithful really so scared that Amaral will raise the money to appeal the judge's decision ? Of course there is more than one way to skin a giraffe but it does illustrate just how insecure certain individuals after yesterday's verdict.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline mercury

Looks like amaral's gofundme page has been banned.... @)(++(*...not having the best of times is he

Do you have a link?


Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
I believe it was reported. Are the faithful really so scared that Amaral will raise the money to appeal the judge's decision ? Of course there is more than one way to skin a giraffe but it does illustrate just how insecure certain individuals after yesterday's verdict.
I posted a link to it on here and was looking forward to seeing just how much his fanclub were prepared to cough up.  Last time I looked Isabel McFadden had donated £7.00  @)(++(*

Offline Jean-Pierre

I believe it was reported. Are the faithful really so scared that Amaral will raise the money to appeal the judge's decision ? Of course there is more than one way to skin a giraffe but it does illustrate just how insecure certain individuals after yesterday's verdict.

Gufundme

What can I raise money for?

 Most people use GoFundMe to raise money for themselves, a friend or loved one during life's important moments. This includes things like medical expenses, education costs, volunteer programs, youth sports, funerals & memorials - even animals & pets.

That said, we're always amazed at all the unique ways people use GoFundMe to raise money online. The possibilities are endless! Watch some Recent Success Stories or Take the Tour >>.

I dont think causes endorsed by gofundme include beer money, or legal expenses for a bent cop to appeal a court decision in favour of grieving parents. 
 

Offline Brietta

I posted a link to it on here and was looking forward to seeing just how much his fanclub were prepared to cough up.  Last time I looked Isabel McFadden had donated £7.00  @)(++(*

Tall oaks and all that ...
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
I don't think for one moment you are party to the shenanigans at McCann Central.

Still it's always nicer to feel included  ?{)(**
What are you on about?

Offline mercury

Again, I may be remembering incorrectly, but I thought that Amaral lost a case against his brother, where he owed his brother a considerable amount of money?   Please correct me if I am wrong.

And his book was blocked in the UK.  Was that via the Courts?  Dunno


So, if I am correct, at least 3 cases that Amaral has lost.  Seems he gets things wrong.

I don't know. I've never taken any interest n G Amaral's private life and family squabbles as an indicator of anything.
I assumed you were asking about cases connected to his police career and connected directly or indirectly to the Maddie case.  Everyone has skeletons in their cupboards, they can't be taken as a given of much, generally speaking. IMO.

Offline pathfinder73

Expresso 2008



Q – Former inspector Gonçalo Amaral remains convinced of your involvement in Madeleine’s disappearance. Did you read ‘The Truth of the Lie’, the book that he wrote?

Kate and Gerry – No.
Kate – Why would I?
Gerry – I won’t learn anything from reading it.

Q – It was a success in Portugal.
 
Gerry – Was it? How many copies did it sell?

Q – Approximately 200 thousand. Next week, it is edited in Spain.

Gerry – That is what can be called illicit enrichment.

Q – Your English lawyers already have a translated copy and they are analyzing it. Do you intend to sue Gonçalo Amaral?

Gerry – At this moment we are focused on what we can do to find Madeleine and not in suing anyone.
Kate – All that I am going to say about this – because I’m not going to waste any time on Mr Amaral – is that as a professional and as a person his behaviour has been a disgrace.

Q – Aren’t you curious to know what the book says?

Kate – What for? It must be nothing but a load of rubbish. It is so secondary… It certainly won’t help to find our daughter. My consolation is that on the cover he calls her Maddie, the name that the media have invented. We never called her anything like that.

Q – But you do know the theory that Gonçalo Amaral defends: Madeleine accidentally died in the Ocean Club apartment and you concealed the body.

Gerry – It really is a waste of time. And we need all the time that we can get to analyze the investigation’s documents, which contain a lot of information that we didn’t know about.
Kate – You just have to cross, loosely, his theory with the process in order to understand that the facts that he reports are not correct.

Q – There is a theory that defends that the coordinator was removed from the investigation due to British political pressure.

Gerry – Who dismissed him?

Q – The PJ’s national director.

Gerry – Then you have to ask him if he was pressured. Or if Gordon Brown discussed the case with him. He surely didn’t.

Q – He also resigned. And largely due to this process.

Gerry – That was not what I was told. Apparently he had a vision of the police itself that was different from the one held by the Justice Minister.

Q – In a final analysis, they both left the PJ because the investigation failed.

Gerry – That’s not our fault. I do not criticize the authorities over not trying to find Madeleine. It doesn’t matter anymore. Now all that matters is that we do everything to try to find her, through our own methods.

Q – Did you ever get to know Gonçalo Amaral?

Kate – The question is the other way around: did he get to know us?
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline sadie

I don't know. I've never taken any interest n G Amaral's private life and family squabbles as an indicator of anything.
I assumed you were asking about cases connected to his police career and connected directly or indirectly to the Maddie case.  Everyone has skeletons in their cupboards, they can't be taken as a given of much, generally speaking. IMO.
There was another Court case that I forgot about.

After being found guilty in the Torture case, Goncalo tried to get the decision reversed.  He lost.

So at the very least he LOST the following cases against him:
1)  Perjury in the Torture case.  LOST
2)  An attempt to get the Perjury decision reversed ... LOST
3)  Lawsuit against his brother, (Amaral owed him mega bucks) ... LOST
4)  Case against Marcos Aragao Correia and Dores ....  LOST


Was there another?


I see that it seems my original list of cases that he LOST has been taken down.  Why?

Kindly do not remove this list.    Thank you
It is relevant, and could be part of the reason that the Judge awarded higher than expected damages. 

Maybe she felt that she couldn't trust Amarals testimony?

Offline Montclair

There was another Court case that I forgot about.

After being found guilty in the Torture case, Goncalo tried to get the decision reversed.  He lost.

So at the very least he LOST the following cases against him:
1)  Perjury in the Torture case.  LOST
2)  An attempt to get the Perjury decision reversed ... LOST
3)  Lawsuit against his brother, (Amaral owed him mega bucks) ... LOST
4)  Case against Marcos Aragao Correia and Dores ....  LOST


Was there another?


I see that it seems my original list of cases that he LOST has been taken down.  Why?

Kindly do not remove this list.    Thank you
It is relevant, and could be part of the reason that the Judge awarded higher than expected damages. 

Maybe she felt that she couldn't trust Amarals testimony?


Don't be silly! Of course, the judge did not take into consideration these other cases. That's not how justice is carried out.

FYI, Gonçalo and his brother are getting along very well now. Everybody has family squabbles.

Offline sadie

Don't be silly! Of course, the judge did not take into consideration these other cases. That's not how justice is carried out.

FYI, Gonçalo and his brother are getting along very well now. Everybody has family squabbles.

I am not saying the cases per se, but the fact that he has told lies and done shifty things.  Maybe he behaved the same in Court?


Who paid the bill off then?  Amarals money was tied up.

Offline faithlilly

Don't be silly! Of course, the judge did not take into consideration these other cases. That's not how justice is carried out.

FYI, Gonçalo and his brother are getting along very well now. Everybody has family squabbles.

What the faithful seem to forget it is because of Amaral's success at getting verdicts overturned in this case that has brought us to where were are now. No reason to see why that will change.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?