Why the abduction theory is both improbable and implausible...

[Alfred R Jones]

....over to the "sceptics" to explain this one.

[Alfred R Jones]

Come on, this should be an easy one for those of you who take enjoyment from ridiculing the notion that Madeleine was abducted.  Apart from the fact that there is a lack of forensic evidence of an abduction (something I fully acknowledge) perhaps someone could exlain why (given all the known facts of the case) it is highly unlikely and most definitely implausible that Madeleine was abducted? 

[stephen25000]

Come on, this should be an easy one for those of you who take enjoyment from ridiculing the notion that Madeleine was abducted.  Apart from the fact that there is a lack of forensic evidence of an abduction (something I fully acknowledge) perhaps someone could exlain why (given all the known facts of the case) it is highly unlikely and most definitely implausible that Madeleine was abducted?

Well, let's start with a point, I've made many times before.

This case has had unparalleled worldwide publicity, and with an abduction, it would not involve just one person.

Other people would know or have suspicions if someone had behaved out of the ordinary, and with a reward on offer, at one time I believe , approx a £miilion, someone would have snitched.

[Alfred R Jones]

Well, let's start with a point, I've made many times before.

This case has had unparalleled worldwide publicity, and with an abduction, it would not involve just one person.

Other people would know or have suspicions if someone had behaved out of the ordinary, and with a reward on offer, at one time I believe , approx a £miilion, someone would have snitched.

And that is your sole reason for believing that the abduction theory is both improbable and implausible?

So, let's say there were two or three people involved in the abduction - if one person "snitched" on the other two do you think they would a) be rewarded financially or b) be charged with being involved in a child abduction?

[Brietta]

Indeed it could.

and the mere fact that they left the children for extended periods undefended, whilst they wined and dined. &%+((£

Do you agree that Madeleine's parents are intelligent people?

[stephen25000]

And that is your sole reason for believing that the abduction theory is both improbable and implausible?

So, let's say there were two or three people involved in the abduction - if one person "snitched" on the other two do you think they would a) be rewarded financially or b) be charged with being involved in a child abduction?

No, far from my only reason.

More to come.

[stephen25000]

Do you agree that Madeleine's parents are intelligent people?

Why would 'intelligent' people leave children in a precarious situation in an unknown country.

One thing for sure, they were arrogant.

[Alfred R Jones]

No, far from my only reason.

More to come.

OK, well whilst you are preparing more reasons for why the abduction theory is both improbable and implausible perhaps you could answer the question I posed to you in response to your first reason concerning your belief that somebody would have come forward and spilt the beans in return for claiming the reward.

[stephen25000]

OK, well whilst you are preparing more reasons for why the abduction theory is both improbable and implausible perhaps you could answer the question I posed to you in response to your first reason concerning your belief that somebody would have come forward and spilt the beans in return for claiming the reward.

Money, pure and simple.

Now that has been said, many times.

[lordpookles]

Question Misty. Do you think the couple seem narcasistic taking them at face value from all the TV interviews we have seen?

[Mr Gray]

If we look at the possibilities as to what happened to Maddie...look at all the facts then abduction is by a mile the most probable scenario...and SY seem to agree..

Despite all the bluster NO ONE has been able to come up with an a possible accident scenario......

[stephen25000]

If we look at the possibilities as to what happened to Maddie...look at all the facts then abduction is by a mile the most probable scenario...and SY seem to agree..

Despite all the bluster NO ONE has been able to come up with an a possible accident scenario......

It has been done before dave.

Abduction meanwhile, zero evidence.

[Alfred R Jones]

Money, pure and simple.

Now that has been said, many times.

That is not answering the question I put to you.

Here it is again:


So, let's say there were two or three people involved in the abduction - if one person "snitched" on the other two do you think they would a) be rewarded financially or b) be charged with being involved in a child abduction?

[Mr Gray]

It has been done before dave.

Abduction meanwhile, zero evidence.

Then you can easily give me a reasonable scenario...you cannot because no one was able to come up with one

[misty]

Question Misty. Do you think the couple seem narcasistic taking them at face value from all the TV interviews we have seen?

That is rather like asking if I find Nigel Farage competent to run the country, based on his television performances.