Why the abduction theory is both improbable and implausible...

[Benice]

An older child is much easier to manage.   An older child can be given information such as 'Mummy asked me to collect you'    'Mummy and Daddy are waiting for you'.     Later 'Mummy and Daddy don't want you back'   'Mummy and Daddy asked me to look after you'.     Younger children would not understand any of that they would just scream the place down.

Spot on Lace.   IMO being at the 'Terrible Two's'  stage - plus nappy requirements etc. would put the twins in the most difficult age group for an abductor to manage. 

[pathfinder73]

From Lace
An older child is much easier to manage.   An older child can be given information such as 'Mummy asked me to collect you'    'Mummy and Daddy are waiting for you'.     Later 'Mummy and Daddy don't want you back'   'Mummy and Daddy asked me to look after you'.     Younger children would not understand any of that they would just scream the place down.
uquote


Stephen - why don't you give your reasons why you disagree with Lace - otherwise your post is meaningless.

You don't abduct the deceased. If the child died her death was covered up because any evidence of her would convict the ones responsible. SY were searching for a body and the world knows it.

[sadie]

You don't abduct the deceased. If the child died her death was covered up because any evidence of her would convict the ones responsible. SY were searching for a body and the world knows it.

There is NOTHING to prove anyone died in 5A


Once again, you are making enourmous assumptions.


And that is NOT decent.

[slartibartfast]

There is NOTHING to prove anyone died in 5A


Once again, you are making enourmous assumptions.


And that is NOT decent.

That is TOTALLY incorrect. There is more evidence to say someone died than otherwise.

[Mr Gray]

That is TOTALLY incorrect. There is more evidence to say someone died than otherwise.

you are totally incorrect....there is no evidence of a death in 5a ...According to Grime

[stephen25000]

you are totally incorrect....there is no evidence of a death in 5a ...According to Grime

Indications dave.

There is nothing else in this case.

[Mr Gray]

Indications dave.

There is nothing else in this case.

no evidence of death in the apartment...fact

[stephen25000]

no evidence of death in the apartment...fact

Inconclusive forensics as you know.

Indications of a possible death, which have not been disproved.

[Mr Gray]

Inconclusive forensics as you know.

Indications of a possible death, which have not been disproved.

no evidence of death in the apartment...fact

[stephen25000]

no evidence of death in the apartment...fact

No evidence that she left the apartment alive.

and Redwood admitted that possibility.

[Mr Gray]

No evidence that she left the apartment alive.

and Redwood admitted that possibility.

no evidence of death in the apartment...fact

[stephen25000]

no evidence of death in the apartment...fact

Circumstantial evidence of death.

Inconclusive forensics.

No evidence she left the apartment alive.

[Mr Gray]

Circumstantial evidence of death.

Inconclusive forensics.

No evidence she left the apartment alive.

no evidence of death in the apartment...fact

[stephen25000]

no evidence of death in the apartment...fact

You're in a mobius loop.

Fact.

[Mr Gray]

That is TOTALLY incorrect. There is more evidence to say someone died than otherwise.

there is no evidence of death in the apartment...the very fact that posters on here want to ignore the truth is an indication of why their conclusions are so wrong