Why the abduction theory is both improbable and implausible...

[stephen25000]

there is no evidence of death in the apartment...the very fact that posters on here want to ignore the truth is an indication of why their conclusions are so wrong

it is evidence dave, it's called circumstantial.

Merely because it wasn't confirmed by the forensics did not mean it can be dismissed.

That is whet mccann tried bringing the matter up in the trial before the judge slapped him down. Metaphorically of course.

That showed the mccanns were and are still worried what the dogs indicated.

[Alfred R Jones]

That is TOTALLY incorrect. There is more evidence to say someone died than otherwise.

Can you point me to this conclusion in the Final Report please?

[Mr Gray]

it is evidence dave, it's called circumstantial.

Merely because it wasn't confirmed by the forensics did not mean it can be dismissed.

That is whet mccann tried bringing the matter up in the trial before the judge slapped him down. Metaphorically of course.

That showed the mccanns were and are still worried what the dogs indicated.

It shows the mccanns are concerned about lies being spread about the alerts..Grime confirms they are not evidence...posters like you are spreading lies...and others believe them

[stephen25000]

It shows the mccanns are concerned about lies being spread about the alerts..Grime confirms they are not evidence...posters like you are spreading lies...and others believe them

I am not spreading lies dave.

Merely the facts.

Don't kid yourself otherwise.

[Mr Gray]

I am not spreading lies dave.

Merely the facts.

Don't kid yourself otherwise.

no evidence of death in the apartment...to say there is ...is lies

[stephen25000]

no evidence of death in the apartment...to say there is ...is lies

Wrong dave.

Circumstantial evidence of death.

Not proved or disproved by forensics/

So it remains a possibility.

[Alfred R Jones]

Indications of death in the apartment - let's see the bit in the Final Report which lists them then.

[Mr Gray]

Wrong dave.

Circumstantial evidence of death.

Not proved or disproved by forensics/

So it remains a possibility.

there is no circumstantial evidence..stop spreading lies

[stephen25000]

there is no circumstantial evidence..stop spreading lies

I am not the one telling lies dave.

[Mr Gray]

I am not the one telling lies dave.

you are...no evidence of death...circumstantial or otherwise

[stephen25000]

you are...no evidence of death...circumstantial or otherwise

Wrong again dave.

[slartibartfast]

you are...no evidence of death...circumstantial or otherwise

As usual you didn't actually read what I put.

[Mr Gray]

That is TOTALLY incorrect. There is more evidence to say someone died than otherwise.

as there is no evidence of death your statement has to be wrong...it seem you don't understand what you post

[slartibartfast]

as there is no evidence of death your statement has to be wrong...it seem you don't understand what you post

You seem hard of understanding. "Than otherwise" is the key bit.

[Alfred R Jones]

You seem hard of understanding. "Than otherwise" is the key bit.

So there is more evidence that someone died in Apartment 5a than lived in Apartment 5a...? &%+((£