Why the abduction theory is both improbable and implausible...

[ShiningInLuz]

Faithlilly,   the only scenario that SY came up with was that a burglar might have killed Madeleine in a botched robbery.    NOT that they found her dead.

If so,    no scent of death would be in 5a.

I thought SY had concluded that every theorem that does not involve the T9 was possible?  Burglars, abductors, and I can't remember them ruling out woke-and-wandered.  Charity collectors, gungy smelly men, crime anywhere in the Algarve?

Must look up the date of the dig in Luz.  Have we hit the first anniversary?

[Lace]

Now that is quite remarkable as SY don't even know what crime took place.

Well that didn't stop Amaral deciding what had happened did it?

The difference is SY are saying that is what COULD have happened.

[stephen25000]

Well that didn't stop Amaral deciding what had happened did it?

The difference is SY are saying that is what COULD have happened.

Indeed including death in the apartment.

[Lace]

Indeed including death in the apartment.

SY do not accuse the McCann's though Stephen,  they say the McCann's are not suspects.

[Carew]

Thats "Many"s problem then.

Indeed...........

As is the "problem" of the "many" who may end up having, not only to believe what they felt to be impossible, but unthinkable too!

[jassi]

SY do not accuse the McCann's though Stephen,  they say the McCann's are not suspects.

As far as I'm aware, nobody has yet been formerly  accused of anything.

[Carew]

Yes, Faithlilly has given us an excellent example of taking a statement saying one thing, putting it through the "sceptic" spin machine and coming out with something a little different.

Andy Redwood said:

"There is always the potential that she didn't leave the apartment alive. What is important for us to do is consider all the options,"

Put through the "Sceptic" spin machine comes out as:

The Met believe Madeleine died in the apartment.

Nice one.

Whereas, put through the "Supporter" spin machine...........by the time the Chinese Whisper and Translation Error deflections have been brought into play,........... the wonder is that any such comment is accepted as existing at all!

[Mr Gray]

Whereas, put through the "Supporter" spin machine...........by the time the Chinese Whisper and Translation Error deflections have been brought into play,........... the wonder is that any such comment is accepted as existing at all!

Since the comment was recorded live we know exactly what redwood said

Alfred has posted the exact words .... No spin
Faith has altered them.  Spin or fraudulent

[pegasus]

SY do not publish everything they do.
For example it is obvious they must have interviewed all the group.
They have never announced this.
I rest my case.

[Carew]

Since the comment was recorded live we know exactly what redwood said

Alfred has posted the exact words .... No spin
Faith has altered them.  Spin or fraudulent

Errrr.........Yes, I know, Davel............

So what would be the point of your "Spin or Fraudulent?" accusation.......... which would therefore be a bit obvious?.........

(A mistake, maybe as another option?)

[Alfred R Jones]

Whereas, put through the "Supporter" spin machine...........by the time the Chinese Whisper and Translation Error deflections have been brought into play,........... the wonder is that any such comment is accepted as existing at all!

Are you defending Faithlilly's blatant misrepresentation of the truth?  How about some criticism where it's due, eh?  I have spun nothing, she very obviously has - slag her off for a change!

[Alice Purjorick]

Since the comment was recorded live we know exactly what redwood said

Alfred has posted the exact words .... No spin
Faith has altered them.  Spin or fraudulent

Hardly fraudulent unless you are doing a Humpty Dumpty again.

[Mr Gray]

Errrr.........Yes, I know, Davel............

So what would be the point of your "Spin or Fraudulent?" accusation.......... which would therefore be a bit obvious?.........

(A mistake, maybe as another option?)

.

Why did faith persist with something blatantly untrue..... Simple
If she stuck to the truth she would realise her theories have no basis

[Alfred R Jones]

Hardly fraudulent unless you are doing a Humpty Dumpty again.

Why is it that you reserve your criticisms on this forum solely  to those who are of the opinion that Madeleine was abducted? 

[Alice Purjorick]

Why is it that you reserve your criticisms on this forum solely to those who are of the opinion that Madeleine was abducted?

You mean you criticise McCann supporters?
Because they are the easiest targets?
Because I enjoy it?
Because I can?
Because in this instance it related to the incorrect of use of the word fraudulent?
Take your pick from the last four.