The parents of a missing child don't matter.

[Brietta]

I have difficulty in responding to what you post because it consists mostly of opinion, which is obviously irrefutable because it has no basis in fact.

If there is 'no dearth' of examples of 'what the Drs McCann have suffered' then please give examples, although what it has to do with this forum I don't know.

They are the parents of a missing child, true. They are also a couple who's version of events is not believed by everyone. Because of their inconsistent stories they aroused the suspicions of the Portuguese police and were eventually made arguidos. Although not enough evidence was collected to charge them the fact remains that they have failed to convince many people that they told the truth. The only people to blame for that is the McCanns, no-one else.

Hasn't it struck you that these much maligned parents ... are innocent ... a status confirmed by the Portuguese Judiciary.

Hasn't it struck you how ridiculous it is when you state "The only people to blame for that is the McCanns, no-one else."and how it illustrates exactly your unfounded and downright nasty opinions of people you really know nothing about and mirrors the rationale used to abuse them on a daily basis.

[Brietta]

You seem to be ignoring the basic questions. Lest ye forget they were:
You clearly believe there has been a strategy. In your opinion has this strategy been implemented by a lone nutter? or is it a carefully coordinated strategy involving a group of people?. What do you suppose is the long term aim for this strategy?

If you had been responsible for a heinous crime for which someone else was being blamed ... you would of course join a group which advocated the innocence of the accused parties and take up the cudgels on their behalf.

                                                                   £5%4%

[Brietta]

Your clear hatred of Amaral blocks your reasoning.

                                                                             
                        You illustrate incredibly stupidity every time you post such foolish accusations.

[stephen25000]

                                                                             
                        You illustrate incredibly stupidity every time you post such foolish accusations.

Hardly.

It is as obvious as your clear bias towards the mccanns. %£&)**# %£&)**# %£&)**#

[Brietta]

The actual fact is, it has been ascertained who is guilty of removing Madeleine from the apartment.

I hope you are not primed to demonstrate more aversion to Madeleine McCann's parents in my anticipated reply ... although it is possible you might have managed a variation on a theme of your disdain for them, I doubt it.

[stephen25000]

I hope you are not primed to demonstrate more aversion to Madeleine McCann's parents in my anticipated reply ... although it is possible you might have managed a variation on a theme of your disdain for them, I doubt it.

Give me one logical reason why I should admire the pair who are responsible for this case  ?

[Alice Purjorick]

If you had been responsible for a heinous crime for which someone else was being blamed ... you would of course join a group which advocated the innocence of the accused parties and take up the cudgels on their behalf.

                                                                   £5%4%

Was that a question or a statement?
It seems however you are implying that one of the people, who does all "the McCann bashing" to which you refer, is actually the guilty party? An interesting notion considering no one knows what if any crime was committed.
You still seem to be avoiding the questions I posed.

[G-Unit]

Hasn't it struck you that these much maligned parents ... are innocent ... a status confirmed by the Portuguese Judiciary.

Hasn't it struck you how ridiculous it is when you state "The only people to blame for that is the McCanns, no-one else."and how it illustrates exactly your unfounded and downright nasty opinions of people you really know nothing about and mirrors the rationale used to abuse them on a daily basis.

I don't know whether the McCanns are innocent of any involvement in the disappearance of their daughter or not, and neither do you, You believe in them and I'm not sure.

What I find ridiculous is that a group of people who have no more knowledge of what happened than I do choose to defend this couple, whom they know nothing about, to the extent that they do. My opinions are definitely not unfounded, they are based on what I have seen and read about the case, and if I post something it's based on the facts in so far as we know them.

The reason people doubt the McCanns are many. They have had many years to put the record straight but have never even attempted to do so. If people conclude that's because they can't, then the blame for that lies with them, no-one else. I think some people have got frustrated and have gone too far and made personal attacks on the Mccanns. I don't support that and don't do it myself. Abuse and questioning are not the same thing.

[Alfred R Jones]

I don't know whether the McCanns are innocent of any involvement in the disappearance of their daughter or not, and neither do you, You believe in them and I'm not sure.

What I find ridiculous is that a group of people who have no more knowledge of what happened than I do choose to defend this couple, whom they know nothing about, to the extent that they do. My opinions are definitely not unfounded, they are based on what I have seen and read about the case, and if I post something it's based on the facts in so far as we know them.

The reason people doubt the McCanns are many. They have had many years to put the record straight but have never even attempted to do so. If people conclude that's because they can't, then the blame for that lies with them, no-one else. I think some people have got frustrated and have gone too far and made personal attacks on the Mccanns. I don't support that and don't do it myself. Abuse and questioning are not the same thing.

Kate McCann has written a book and both McCanns have given countless interviews over the years.  In what way would you like them to attempt to put the record straight exactly?  What haven't they told you that you think you need to know in order to stop doubting them?

[G-Unit]

Kate McCann has written a book and both McCanns have given countless interviews over the years.  In what way would you like them to attempt to put the record straight exactly?  What haven't they told you that you think you need to know in order to stop doubting them?

They have given many interviews, but have only been asked difficult questions by one interviewer; Sandra Felgueiras. Each time she asked a difficult question the answer was either flippant or deflected, never answered seriously. They could start there, perhaps.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WWyjVmxWzDY

[Alfred R Jones]

They have given many interviews, but have only been asked difficult questions by one interviewer; Sandra Felgueiras. Each time she asked a difficult question the answer was either flippant or deflected, never answered seriously. They could start there, perhaps.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WWyjVmxWzDY

Now perhaps you can answer my question.  What haven't they told you that you think you need to know in order to stop doubting them?

[ShiningInLuz]

Kate McCann has written a book and both McCanns have given countless interviews over the years.  In what way would you like them to attempt to put the record straight exactly?  What haven't they told you that you think you need to know in order to stop doubting them?

I have got to say that on the theme of unturned stones, the McCanns are in prime position to turn over quite a few.

They are not the only people who can turn over unturned stones.  Indeed, they cannot turn over the majority of the unturned stones.

Further, they do not have to prove their innocence.  That notion is ridiculous

However, the pile of unturned stones they control is large.  Turning over a few would progress the investigation into Madeleine's disappearance.  Surely this is central to working out what happened?

[Alfred R Jones]

I have got to say that on the theme of unturned stones, the McCanns are in prime position to turn over quite a few.

They are not the only people who can turn over unturned stones.  Indeed, they cannot turn over the majority of the unturned stones.

Further, they do not have to prove their innocence.  That notion is ridiculous

However, the pile of unturned stones they control is large.  Turning over a few would progress the investigation into Madeleine's disappearance.  Surely this is central to working out what happened?

Would you kindly furnish us with some examples of these unturned stones?

[G-Unit]

Now perhaps you can answer my question.  What haven't they told you that you think you need to know in order to stop doubting them?

I'm not wasting time making a list if that's what you want. It's all out there and if you haven't seen it maybe you should do some research. You may then find that your faith in this couple whom you don't know (I assume) could be somewhat naive.

[Alfred R Jones]

I'm not wasting time making a list if that's what you want. It's all out there and if you haven't seen it maybe you should do some research. You may then find that your faith in this couple whom you don't know (I assume) could be somewhat naive.

No need to be so stroppy!  I didn't ask for a list so how about just giving me one example of something they haven't told us that would make you doubt them less.