The parents of a missing child don't matter.

[stephen25000]

I have no idea if SY are hanging on to my every word, but I do KNOW that they have taken notice of what I have said in at least one area, and acted.

They also appear to have publicly acknowledged me, but in a way that neither you nor anyone on here, unless in the know, would recognise


I cant say anymore.

Words fail.

[slartibartfast]

Words fail.

I can only assume it was a WU.

[stephen25000]

I can only assume it was a WU.

I wouldn't make that assumption. &%+((£

[G-Unit]

Words fail.

You said what I felt when I read that. I had no answer except....Huh?

Anyway, back to the subject. The parents of a stolen child matter a great deal. In this case there is no evidence that Madeleine was stolen. Her parents were the last to see her and their stories aroused suspicion.

[stephen25000]

You said what I felt when I read that. I had no answer except....Huh?

Anyway, back to the subject. The parents of a stolen child matter a great deal. In this case there is no evidence that Madeleine was stolen. Her parents were the last to see her and their stories aroused suspicion.

That states the situation precisely G-Unit.

[Lace]

You said what I felt when I read that. I had no answer except....Huh?

Anyway, back to the subject. The parents of a stolen child matter a great deal. In this case there is no evidence that Madeleine was stolen. Her parents were the last to see her and their stories aroused suspicion.

Strange how their stories haven't aroused suspicion with SY isn't it?    They say the McCann's are not suspects.

[G-Unit]

Strange how their stories haven't aroused suspicion with SY isn't it?    They say the McCann's are not suspects.

Extremely strange. It is, of course, almost two years since DCI Redwood said that. Have SY made any pronouncements since then?

[Alfred R Jones]

Extremely strange. It is, of course, almost two years since DCI Redwood said that. Have SY made any pronouncements since then?

The McCanns' statements and actions all preceded DCI Redwood's pronouncement - what do you think might have changed?

[Brietta]

Extremely strange. It is, of course, almost two years since DCI Redwood said that. Have SY made any pronouncements since then?

Obviously you consider it necessary for SY to make a periodic announcement confirming Madeleine McCann's parents are not persons of interest ... for the majority, once is enough.

[G-Unit]

The McCanns' statements and actions all preceded DCI Redwood's pronouncement - what do you think might have changed?

I have no idea. I'm simply pointing out that it's along time since SY said anything about what they're doing.

[faithlilly]

The McCanns' statements and actions all preceded DCI Redwood's pronouncement - what do you think might have changed?

And when Redwood made that announcement all those moons ago he also admitted that not all the files had been looked at. Who knows what's happened since.

[Alfred R Jones]

And when Redwood made that announcement all those moons ago he also admitted that not all the files had been looked at. Who knows what's happened since.

    Who knows what's happened since?  Well, I do know that the Met made a whole bunch of people arguidos and none of them was the McCanns and they also seem to be linking Madeleine's disappearance to a spate of burglaries and sex assaults on the Algarve but I'm sure that's all secret code for "we think the McCanns dunnit".

[jassi]

    Who knows what's happened since?  Well, I do know that the Met made a whole bunch of people arguidos and none of them was the McCanns and they also seem to be linking Madeleine's disappearance to a spate of burglaries and sex assaults on the Algarve but I'm sure that's all secret code for "we think the McCanns dunnit".

I suppose they have to do something to justify their time, but nothing seems to have come out of that particular  spurt of activity, nor from all the excavations they did.

[G-Unit]

Obviously you consider it necessary for SY to make a periodic announcement confirming Madeleine McCann's parents are not persons of interest ... for the majority, once is enough.

I think SY keeping their mouths firmly shut is the right thing to do. Why Redwood didn't I can't imagine. What majority? Has there been a headcount?

[Mr Gray]

You said what I felt when I read that. I had no answer except....Huh?

Anyway, back to the subject. The parents of a stolen child matter a great deal. In this case there is no evidence that Madeleine was stolen. Her parents were the last to see her and their stories aroused suspicion.

there is no evidence Ben Needham was stolen...his grandmother was the last to see him alive...his family were suspects...we have not seen their statements so we don't know what they told the police. I have no reason to believe they are involved but they have not been cleared