The parents of a missing child don't matter.

[Alfred R Jones]

Gold star to Lace.
A supporter who acknowledges standard deviation and distribution.
That makes you the brightest of the bunch 

Why didn't you award Davel a gold star when he made a similar point earlier?

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=6311.msg267560#msg267560

[stephen25000]

Davel wrote "its a case of your poor accuracy of reading and recall. Like me ferryman does not think there is any evidence of death in Jersey but ther ecould well have been child abuse....there is in most large institutions...so your claim that "nothing happened there" is pure BS"

How can you misunerstand that? Just because of the " ther ecould"?

Its as bad as someone writing " take her to the local polupice station, would you make a scene, or take iit on the chin ?" - isn't it  *&*%£

Fair enough JP.

 

[Jean-Pierre]

Fair enough JP.

 

De nada Stephen.

[Mr Gray]

Hardly.

She had your number from the start.

and unlike you, knew what she was talking about from years of experience in Social Services.

and she provided no proof of her claim...and sounded like a bit of a fruit cake

[mercury]

and she provide no proof of her claim...and sounded like a bit of a fruit cake

It's hard being challenged by a professional in their field when you're not one I guess. I understand totally.Sometimes you do have to be humble, and listen to the experts. Of,of course, you can slag them off because you dislike what they say.

[Mr Gray]

It's hard being challenged by a professional in their field when you're not one I guess. I understand totally.Sometimes you do have to be humble, and listen to the experts. Of,of course, you can slag them off because you dislike what they say.

i'm more than happy to listen to experts...i do it every day...and every expert i deal with is more than happy to defend their claims. The point I make is that stephen is happy to accept someone as an expert when they agree with  him...hardly an objective view

[stephen25000]

i'm more than happy to listen to experts...i do it every day...and every expert i deal with is more than happy to defend their claims. The point I make is that stephen is happy to accept someone as an expert when they agree with  him...hardly an objective view

Is that why you claimed not so long ago, in some legal proceedings, you were advising your legal team on how to proceed ? *&*%£g

[Mr Gray]

Is that why you claimed not so long ago, in some legal proceedings, you were advising your legal team on how to proceed ? *&*%£g

it was quite some time ago...I was suing a solicitor and my counsel thought I didn't have a case...i told him to serve the writ and the solicitor settled out of court... i could expalin the point of law but it's off topic

[stephen25000]

it was quite some time ago...I was suing a solicitor and my counsel thought I didn't have a case...i told him to serve the writ and the solicitor settled out of court... i could expalin the point of law but it's off topic

Of course dave.

However again, you cannot cite anything.

So as you like to say,

It has no value.

[Mr Gray]

Of course dave.

However again, you cannot cite anything.

So as you like to say,

It has no value.

nothing anyone on this forum says has any value...don't you realise that

[mercury]

i'm more than happy to listen to experts...i do it every day...and every expert i deal with is more than happy to defend their claims. The point I make is that stephen is happy to accept someone as an expert when they agree with  him...hardly an objective view

No, your point was someone couldn't prove their claim to be of a certain profession and very experienced (wasn't it?) and that they sounded like a fruitcake...hardly objective.
If you demand proof of someone's qualifications and experience, you would then have to provide it yourself for all your "claims" too IMHO

[mercury]

nothing anyone on this forum says has any value...don't you realise that

That has to be the most ridiculous post of the month, bravo! Gold star.

 

Enjoy your sparring.

[stephen25000]

nothing anyone on this forum says has any value...don't you realise that

Then why post ?

[Mr Gray]

No, your point was someone couldn't prove their claim to be of a certain profession and very experienced (wasn't it?) and that they sounded like a fruitcake...hardly objective.
If you demand proof of someone's qualifications and experience, you would then have to provide it yourself for all your "claims" too IMHO

first my opinion is subjective and i have never claimed anything else
second...I never asked for proof from her and never would...so you are wrong on both counts
it is rather stupid to ask for proof of professional qualifications on this forum but that does not stop one poster

[Mr Gray]

Then why post ?

are you for real stephen...if my posts have no value..as you have claimed...then why should others