Met given 6 months and £2 million more to find Maddie. Is this the end?

[mercury]

it's quite clear from those who you support and those who you attack on here exactly where your allegiance lies

Allegiance
2.
loyalty or devotion to some person, group, cause, or the like.


 *&*%£

you're havng a laugh but maybe it says more about you!

I doubt a poster like Alice could be described, let's say, as a member of the Knights of Saint Columbus eg

[Alice Purjorick]

So are we then to assume from the above diatribe that you don't believe the McCanns dunnit, but that you're simply here to get your kicks from trying to wind up McCann 'sycophants"?

Pretty much if you wish to put it that way. I would put it slightly differently, but then I said that months ago however those who know better than me say I am here for another reason. So maybe you had better ask them.

[slartibartfast]

Can we stop the one liner insults please.

[John]

I must say, having listened to the Andrew Pierce LBC discussion with former Met Commander John O'Connor and journalist Sonia Poulton in respect of the additional two million pounds allocated to the Madeleine investigation, I came away with the distinct impression that most of what was being said was more window dressing than factual based.

Sonia Poulton wasted a unique opportunity to put forward her own findings whilst O'Connor came across as badly informed and out of touch.

One comment stands out for me when O'Connor was asked why the Maddie case was awarded so much funding whilst others like the Needham's had to fight tooth and nail for it.   His response was that there were no leads in the Ben Needham case whereas there were many in the Maddie case generated by the parents own investigators.  But weren't the McCann's own investigators creating false leads and giving false hope simply in order to line their own pockets?

The bottom line is that there are no new leads in the Maddie case, the trail has gone stone cold.  What SY are doing is raking over old coals in the hope that something new will turn up but that just hasn't happened.  On what basis SIO DCI Nicola Wall has sought additional funding can only be speculated because there can be no doubt that she and her team are no further forward than the PJ were seven years ago.

Anyone who hasn't already heard the discussion can do so on our Facebook site.

http://facebook.com/UkJusticeForum

[ferryman]

I must say, having listened to the Andrew Pierce LBC discussion with former Met Commander John O'Connor and journalist Sonia Poulton in respect of the additional two million pounds allocated to the Madeleine investigation, I came away with the distinct impression that most of what was being said was more window dressing than factual based.

Sonia Poulton wasted a unique opportunity to put forward her own findings whilst O'Connor came across as badly informed and out of touch.

One comment stands out for me when O'Connor was asked why the Maddie case was awarded so much funding whilst others like the Needham's had to fight tooth and nail for it.   His response was that there were no leads in the Ben Needham case whereas there were many in the Maddie case generated by the parents own investigators.  But weren't the McCann's own investigators creating false leads and giving false hope simply in order to line their own pockets?

The bottom line is that there are no new leads in the Maddie case, the trail has gone stone cold.  What SY are doing is raking over old coals in the hope that something new will turn up but that just hasn't happened.  On what basis SIO DCI Nicola Wall has sought additional funding can only be speculated because there can be no doubt that she and her team are no further forward than the PJ were seven years ago.

Anyone who hasn't already heard the discussion can do so on our Facebook site.

http://facebook.com/UkJusticeForum

  On what basis SIO DCI Nicola Wall has sought additional funding can only be speculated because there can be no doubt that she and her team are no further forward than the PJ were seven years ago.

I would tend to suggest that what I underline may be the true speculation ....

[Mr Gray]

I must say, having listened to the Andrew Pierce LBC discussion with former Met Commander John O'Connor and journalist Sonia Poulton in respect of the additional two million pounds allocated to the Madeleine investigation, I came away with the distinct impression that most of what was being said was more window dressing than factual based.

Sonia Poulton wasted a unique opportunity to put forward her own findings whilst O'Connor came across as badly informed and out of touch.

One comment stands out for me when O'Connor was asked why the Maddie case was awarded so much funding whilst others like the Needham's had to fight tooth and nail for it.   His response was that there were no leads in the Ben Needham case whereas there were many in the Maddie case generated by the parents own investigators.  But weren't the McCann's own investigators creating false leads and giving false hope simply in order to line their own pockets?

The bottom line is that there are no new leads in the Maddie case, the trail has gone stone cold.  What SY are doing is raking over old coals in the hope that something new will turn up but that just hasn't happened.  On what basis SIO DCI Nicola Wall has sought additional funding can only be speculated because there can be no doubt that she and her team are no further forward than the PJ were seven years ago.

Anyone who hasn't already heard the discussion can do so on our Facebook site.

http://facebook.com/UkJusticeForum

sorry John but the main points in your posts are pure speculation.
I  think its absurd to suggest Grange is making no progress when they have just been awarded a further 2 million.
There is absolute silence in the Portuguese press...Grange was failing we would hear about it....the fact that we are hearing nothing means that Grange are making progress

[stephen25000]

  On what basis SIO DCI Nicola Wall has sought additional funding can only be speculated because there can be no doubt that she and her team are no further forward than the PJ were seven years ago.

I would tend to suggest that what I underline may be the true speculation ....

30 letters of speculation.

[Mr Gray]

30 letters of speculation.

you don't have a clue what they have found as your pal alice has confirmed

[stephen25000]

it seems that lately as others have also noted your posts are reduced to emoticons

Some emoticons are a reflection of some posts by other parties.

[stephen25000]

....and still 30 letters of speculation and nothing else to show for £10,000,000.

An excellent use of resources. &%&£(+ &%&£(+ &%&£(+

[ferryman]

From what did you draw that conclusion?
I believe the Met are investigating the disappearance of Madeleine McCann where that will finish up is anyone's guess. It should be forgotten that The Met do not have primacy unless it transpires a crime was committed in their jurisdiction.
It does not follow that because I am not a McCann sycophant, I believe they dunnit, to pinch your word.
However I doubt you will ever understand that the whole round world is not split into two on the topic McCann.

It should be forgotten that The Met do not have primacy ...

Why should we forget that?

[Lace]

....and still 30 letters of speculation and nothing else to show for £10,000,000.

An excellent use of resources. &%&£(+ &%&£(+ &%&£(+

When were these letters sent and what did they contain?

[Lace]

Who aren't? The PJ? How do you know?

Well I don't see the McCann's being escorted to Portugal for questioning for one.   I would have thought that if the PJ believed the McCann's to be guilty they wouldn't have waited years and money on investigating other possibilities.

[Alfred R Jones]

I must say, having listened to the Andrew Pierce LBC discussion with former Met Commander John O'Connor and journalist Sonia Poulton in respect of the additional two million pounds allocated to the Madeleine investigation, I came away with the distinct impression that most of what was being said was more window dressing than factual based.

Sonia Poulton wasted a unique opportunity to put forward her own findings whilst O'Connor came across as badly informed and out of touch.

One comment stands out for me when O'Connor was asked why the Maddie case was awarded so much funding whilst others like the Needham's had to fight tooth and nail for it.   His response was that there were no leads in the Ben Needham case whereas there were many in the Maddie case generated by the parents own investigators.  But weren't the McCann's own investigators creating false leads and giving false hope simply in order to line their own pockets?

The bottom line is that there are no new leads in the Maddie case, the trail has gone stone cold.  What SY are doing is raking over old coals in the hope that something new will turn up but that just hasn't happened.  On what basis SIO DCI Nicola Wall has sought additional funding can only be speculated because there can be no doubt that she and her team are no further forward than the PJ were seven years ago.

Anyone who hasn't already heard the discussion can do so on our Facebook site.

http://facebook.com/UkJusticeForum

You listen to one interview on a radio station featuring two people not involved in the investigation and are able to come to that unequivocal conclusion how exactly?!!

[Angelo222]

30 letters of speculation.

The benefit of issuing all these ILOR's is that when the investigation eventually goes tits up runs out of steam, SY will be able to blame everyone else.  They don't even know for sure what happened to Maddie so how can they possibly investigate the case as a crime.