Author Topic: Time for guilters to change stance ?  (Read 6282 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline adam

Time for guilters to change stance ?
« on: December 30, 2015, 05:19:58 PM »
https://youtu.be/xPwzI1cDMm4

Although the American accent has gone, perhaps Sheila was in the kitchen ! ?

19
« Last Edit: January 08, 2016, 12:33:44 PM by John »

Offline Myster

Re: Time for guilters to change stance ?
« Reply #1 on: December 30, 2015, 07:33:18 PM »
I notice that your tongue is firmly implanted in your cheek, Adam.  @)(++(*
It's one of them cases, in'it... one of them f*ckin' cases.

Offline Myster

Re: Time for guilters to change stance ?
« Reply #2 on: December 30, 2015, 08:00:44 PM »
My word, that's a very posh cut-glass accent for a Yorkshireman... jolly bad show, what, what, what!!!

But it can't disguise the fact that five years later he's still peddling the same old twaddle.  %56&
It's one of them cases, in'it... one of them f*ckin' cases.

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: Time for guilters to change stance ?
« Reply #3 on: December 30, 2015, 09:04:18 PM »
https://youtu.be/xPwzI1cDMm4

Although the American accent has gone, perhaps Sheila was in the kitchen ! ?

I doubt it very much.I place a lot of weight on the testimony of Dr Craig and Dr Vanezis and it doesn't fit with SC in the kitchen around the time the raid team broke in.   

Adam why not post up parts 1 - 3 incl as well?  Or are they unrelated?  I can't recall now? 

Although I disagree with the content I think Mike's delivery is good in the vid. 
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline Myster

Re: Time for guilters to change stance ?
« Reply #4 on: December 30, 2015, 09:28:50 PM »
Doubt it very much!!?  IMPOSSIBLEMENT!.... as a phony Italian lawyer once said.

His others are more of the same old, he just likes having his mug on YouTube.

As for the delivery?... nowhere near as tuneful as Ana Moura.*sigh*
It's one of them cases, in'it... one of them f*ckin' cases.

Offline adam

Re: Time for guilters to change stance ?
« Reply #5 on: December 30, 2015, 09:29:19 PM »
https://youtu.be/2V1BWtxcrzc

Found part 3. Which is saying the police are responsible for Sheila's death. Mmmm.
« Last Edit: December 30, 2015, 09:32:22 PM by adam »

Offline Myster

Re: Time for guilters to change stance ?
« Reply #6 on: December 30, 2015, 09:38:20 PM »
Was that Welsh Dresser nicked from White House Farm?  &%+((£
It's one of them cases, in'it... one of them f*ckin' cases.

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: Time for guilters to change stance ?
« Reply #7 on: December 30, 2015, 09:58:31 PM »
https://youtu.be/2V1BWtxcrzc

Found part 3. Which is saying the police are responsible for Sheila's death. Mmmm.

Mmmm indeed!  It doesn't fit with the testimony of Dr Craig and Dr Vanezis.

Mike why do you do this?  You have been involved with the case for some 25 years surely by now you have some coherent narrative that you can sing from the roof tops that doesn't make you look a complete t**t?  Instead you flit from one bizarre theory to the next.  Why?  This time last year you wanted the twins exhumed for DNA evidence when there's no way in the world DNA evidence can assist in this case due to the way the SoC and exhibits were preserved in a pre DNA era.  You surely must realise this and yet you persist....

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=1033.msg208710#msg208710
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline scipio_usmc

Re: Time for guilters to change stance ?
« Reply #8 on: December 31, 2015, 12:23:55 AM »
Mmmm indeed!  It doesn't fit with the testimony of Dr Craig and Dr Vanezis.

Mike why do you do this?  You have been involved with the case for some 25 years surely by now you have some coherent narrative that you can sing from the roof tops that doesn't make you look a complete t**t?  Instead you flit from one bizarre theory to the next.  Why?  This time last year you wanted the twins exhumed for DNA evidence when there's no way in the world DNA evidence can assist in this case due to the way the SoC and exhibits were preserved in a pre DNA era.  You surely must realise this and yet you persist....

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=1033.msg208710#msg208710

In my world mmmmm means mmmmm food but luckily I just had dinner...

Tesko made up that they found blood on the baffles was HP.2  Both Lincoln and Hayward's results were HP 2.1 so right off the bat he starts off with a lie.    He hates the cops so much he is hell bent on pretending they engaged in serious wrongdoing.

He recognizes Sheila was killed.  The only way to say she was killed yet Jeremy innocent is to say police killed her.  This serves his goal of trashing the police so he runs with it even though it is absurd.  Some people like lookout and even NGB encourage him in such efforts and that makes him think others will buy it as well.  Harters got banned after tearing NGB a new one for saying maybe police did shoot her and move her body. 

This kind of crap is why Jeremy needed to distance himself from Mike because it makes Jeremy look bad if he is viewed as endorsing such crap.

Mike has nothing legitimate to run with so takes suspicions Jeremy's team had and crafts wild things.  For challenging such crap I got banned. He simply used my comment to lookout as a pretext.  Most people tolerate him out of necessity and hope he will post some unseen documents.

Jeremy doesn't want the documents posted so in a way him posting them hurts Jeremy.  By posing them he has provided the public with some clarity even though that was not his intention and he actually tried to distort the meaning.  So we have to just ignore his commentary and read the documents ourselves. Without his leaking of documents our understanding would be less so we have to be thankful he is a disloyal twit.

 
“...there are three classes of intellects: one which comprehends by itself; another which appreciates what others comprehend; and a third which neither comprehends by itself nor by the showing of others; the first is the most excellent, the second is good, the third is useless.”  Niccolò Machiavelli

david1819

  • Guest
Re: Time for guilters to change stance ?
« Reply #9 on: December 31, 2015, 08:15:16 AM »
In my world mmmmm means mmmmm food but luckily I just had dinner...

Tesko made up that they found blood on the baffles was HP.2  Both Lincoln and Hayward's results were HP 2.1 so right off the bat he starts off with a lie.    He hates the cops so much he is hell bent on pretending they engaged in serious wrongdoing.

He recognizes Sheila was killed.  The only way to say she was killed yet Jeremy innocent is to say police killed her.  This serves his goal of trashing the police so he runs with it even though it is absurd.  Some people like lookout and even NGB encourage him in such efforts and that makes him think others will buy it as well.  Harters got banned after tearing NGB a new one for saying maybe police did shoot her and move her body. 

This kind of crap is why Jeremy needed to distance himself from Mike because it makes Jeremy look bad if he is viewed as endorsing such crap.

Mike has nothing legitimate to run with so takes suspicions Jeremy's team had and crafts wild things.  For challenging such crap I got banned. He simply used my comment to lookout as a pretext.  Most people tolerate him out of necessity and hope he will post some unseen documents.

Jeremy doesn't want the documents posted so in a way him posting them hurts Jeremy.  By posing them he has provided the public with some clarity even though that was not his intention and he actually tried to distort the meaning.  So we have to just ignore his commentary and read the documents ourselves. Without his leaking of documents our understanding would be less so we have to be thankful he is a disloyal twit.

This letter from Jeremy to Mike is rather amusing



Offline Myster

Re: Time for guilters to change stance ?
« Reply #10 on: December 31, 2015, 08:46:48 AM »
The words pot and kettle spring to mind.
It's one of them cases, in'it... one of them f*ckin' cases.

Offline adam

Re: Time for guilters to change stance ?
« Reply #11 on: December 31, 2015, 12:24:22 PM »
Fair play to some supporters. They put themselves out there, on Youtube, the internet, radio and television. Donating their hard earned money and free time to the cause.

I am not sure why, apart from having to do this to get him released. Every piece of evidence points to Bamber. While everything put forward from supporters have straight forward answers.

Offline adam

Re: Time for guilters to change stance ?
« Reply #12 on: December 31, 2015, 12:29:50 PM »

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: Time for guilters to change stance ?
« Reply #13 on: December 31, 2015, 01:00:20 PM »
Fair play to some supporters. They put themselves out there, on Youtube, the internet, radio and television. Donating their hard earned money and free time to the cause.

I am not sure why, apart from having to do this to get him released. Every piece of evidence points to Bamber. While everything put forward from supporters have straight forward answers.

What about the invisible 'supporters'?  The silent ones?  Those that no one has any knowledge of?

"Reports that say that something hasn't happened are always interesting to me, because as we know, there are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns – the ones we don't know we don't know. And if one looks throughout the history of our country and other free countries, it is the latter category that tend to be the difficult ones."
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline Myster

Re: Time for guilters to change stance ?
« Reply #14 on: December 31, 2015, 01:20:24 PM »
What about the invisible 'supporters'?  The silent ones?  Those that no one has any knowledge of?

"Reports that say that something hasn't happened are always interesting to me, because as we know, there are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns – the ones we don't know we don't know. And if one looks throughout the history of our country and other free countries, it is the latter category that tend to be the difficult ones."

You mean lookout obviously.  8((()*/        Are you taking the p*ss?  &%+((£
It's one of them cases, in'it... one of them f*ckin' cases.