Why is there so much support for Leonor Cipriano from McCann supporters?

[Mr Gray]

Incorrect.

That is why a UK paper had to print an apology to him for a false accusation.

As to the tabloids, the less said the better.

so what did the apology say....most sceptics don't understand what the express said....

[stephen25000]

so what did the apology say....most sceptics don't understand what the express said....

Here we go again.

Claiming people don't understand.

A false claim, but par for the course.

[Mr Gray]

Here we go again.

Claiming people don't understand.

A false claim, but par for the course.

You have claimed the express printed an apology...cite please....I have only seen a correction...no apology...so it seems you definitely don't understand

[Mr Gray]

Here we go again.

Claiming people don't understand.

A false claim, but par for the course.

No apology issued...so it is your claim that is false and mine is correct

[stephen25000]

You have claimed the express printed an apology...cite please....I have only seen a correction...no apology...so it seems you definitely don't understand

Fascinating.

Read it in the Portugal Resident.

'Amaral had not lied in Court'.

The express conceded

I suggest you get your facts right.

[Mr Gray]

Fascinating.

Read it in the Portugal Resident.

'Amaral had not lied in Court'.

The express conceded

I suggest you get your facts right.

you are 100% wrong ...there was no apology as you claimed

[Mr Gray]

Here we go again.

Claiming people don't understand.

A false claim, but par for the course.

I have PROVED you dont understand...I am correct again...the express did not print an apology...

[stephen25000]

i have PROVED you dont understand...I am correct again...the express did not print an apology...

Incorrect.

Why do you persist in pointless arguments ?

The facts of the apology can be seen by any guest or poster on this forum for themselves, as it is stated in the Algarve Resident.

[Mr Gray]

Incorrect.

Why do you persist in pointless arguments ?

The facts of the apology can be seen by any guest or poster on this forum for themselves, as it is stated in the Algarve Resident.

Cite for an apology

The Express did not print an apology...have you seen the correction actually printed by the express...it does not mention apology...it mentions correction. Apology has been made up by Bennett. I have the intelligence to see through it

[Mr Gray]

Incorrect.

Why do you persist in pointless arguments ?

The facts of the apology can be seen by any guest or poster on this forum for themselves, as it is stated in the Algarve Resident.

you first cited the portuguese resident then the algarve resident as your cite....

extract from portuguese resident....

The full text of the Express correction was as follows:

“On the 29th April 2015 we published a headline on the front page which said “Maddy detective did lie about death cover-up claim”. We would like to make it clear that there was no determination by the Portuguese court that Mr Amaral lied. In fact the court ruled that Mr Amaral had breached the McCann’s right to reputation and ordered him to pay damages to them”.

- See more at: http://portugalresident.com/uk-daily-express-publishes-written-apology-over-headline-calling-maddie-cop-a-liar#sthash.6GWk7JdX.dpuf


The full text does not mention apolgy...as confirmed by the portuguese resident... natashA donn used teh word apology...not the express..


you should now apologise to me

[G-Unit]

You cannot make such claims without providing evidence to back it up. There are other cases happening around the world that I am interested in..re miscarriages of justice. I would say that any unbiased person who saw the pictures of cipriano and understood how she was convicted solely on a confession beaten out of her would be interested.
As for amaral...he was sacked...and his own actions discredited himself. The description of him on many sceptic sites as an honourable man is laughable. Everything the uk press has printed about him is true...if it wasn't it would be very easy for him to sue

Apparently not according to the Express;

“On the 29th April 2015 we published a headline on the front page which said “Maddy detective did lie about death cover-up claim”. We would like to make it clear that there was no determination by the Portuguese court that Mr Amaral lied. In fact the court ruled that Mr Amaral had breached the McCann’s right to reputation and ordered him to pay damages to them”. - See more at: http://portugalresident.com/uk-daily-express-publishes-written-apology-over-headline-calling-maddie-cop-a-liar#sthash.73uNX8hR.dpuf

[Mr Gray]

Apparently not according to the Express;

“On the 29th April 2015 we published a headline on the front page which said “Maddy detective did lie about death cover-up claim”. We would like to make it clear that there was no determination by the Portuguese court that Mr Amaral lied. In fact the court ruled that Mr Amaral had breached the McCann’s right to reputation and ordered him to pay damages to them”. - See more at: http://portugalresident.com/uk-daily-express-publishes-written-apology-over-headline-calling-maddie-cop-a-liar#sthash.73uNX8hR.dpuf

You need to read it more critically.....where have the express conceded that amaral did not lie

[stephen25000]

http://portugalresident.com/uk-daily-express-publishes-written-apology-over-headline-calling-maddie-cop-a-liar

UK Daily Express publishes written apology over headline calling Maddie cop a liar - See more at:

http://portugalresident.com/uk-daily-express-publishes-written-apology-over-headline-calling-maddie-cop-a-liar#sthash.TmzwYTaV.dpuf


“On the 29th April 2015 we published a headline on the front page which said “Maddy detective did lie about death cover-up claim”. We would like to make it clear that there was no determination by the Portuguese court that Mr Amaral lied. In fact the court ruled that Mr Amaral had breached the McCann’s right to reputation and ordered him to pay damages to them”. - See more at: http://portugalresident.com/uk-daily-express-publishes-written-apology-over-headline-calling-maddie-cop-a-liar#sthash.DMYQ36o1.dpuf

[Mr Gray]

http://portugalresident.com/uk-daily-express-publishes-written-apology-over-headline-calling-maddie-cop-a-liar

UK Daily Express publishes written apology over headline calling Maddie cop a liar - See more at:

http://portugalresident.com/uk-daily-express-publishes-written-apology-over-headline-calling-maddie-cop-a-liar#sthash.TmzwYTaV.dpuf


“On the 29th April 2015 we published a headline on the front page which said “Maddy detective did lie about death cover-up claim”. We would like to make it clear that there was no determination by the Portuguese court that Mr Amaral lied. In fact the court ruled that Mr Amaral had breached the McCann’s right to reputation and ordered him to pay damages to them”. - See more at: http://portugalresident.com/uk-daily-express-publishes-written-apology-over-headline-calling-maddie-cop-a-liar#sthash.DMYQ36o1.dpuf

so what is the support for your claim the express apologised..because natasha said so ..the Express did not aplologise  you have posted their correction..it does not mention apology

[Mr Gray]

apology
əˈpɒlədʒi/Submit
noun
1.
a regretful acknowledgement of an offence or failure.
"we owe you an apology"
synonyms:   expression of regret, one's regrets; amende honorable; informalapols; informalbeg-pardon
"I owe you an apology"

the express did not use the word apology and did not express regret so did not imply an apology.......it is untrue to say the express apologised ...as I have PROVED