Why is there so much support for Leonor Cipriano from McCann supporters?

[Mr Gray]

That is not absolute proof.

That is an opinion.

torture by the PJ has been proved

[Mr Gray]

That is not absolute proof.

That is an opinion.

there is no absolute proof cipriano is guilty...just the opinion of 2 out of 3 judges

[stephen25000]

torture by the PJ has been proved

So where is the forensic proof it was.

CITE please.

[mercury]

torture by the PJ has been proved

As has murder of a child, you cant cherry pick to suit

[Mr Gray]

So where is the forensic proof it was.

CITE please.

proved in court...overwhelming evidence ...i am not going all through this again

[Mr Gray]

As has murder of a child, you cant cherry pick to suit

I'm not cherry picking...read my posts

[stephen25000]

there is no absolute proof cipriano is guilty...just the opinion of 2 out of 3 judges

You are very selective in which judges you believe.

Namely if they concur with your beliefs they are right, if they don't , they are wrong.

[mercury]

proved in court...overwhelming evidence ...i am not going all through this again

Cite the evidence then, i doubt you can

[mercury]

I'm not cherry picking...read my posts

I have and i do and theyre pretty dismal...overall

[stephen25000]

proved in court...overwhelming evidence ...i am not going all through this again

Not really.

It was the verdict of a judge.

Another judge could have ruled differently.

As we know, Cipriano lied.

Her testimony is therefore subject to scrutiny.

[mercury]

You are very selective in which judges you believe.

Namely if they concur with your beliefs they are right, if they don't , they are wrong.

 

[Mr Gray]

in reply to you both...the evidence against the PJ was overwhelming.....their claim that cipriano fell down the stairs was an obvious lie...the evidence against cipriano was non existent

[Mr Gray]

Not really.

It was the verdict of a judge.

Another judge could have ruled differently.

As we know, Cipriano lied.

Her testimony is therefore subject to scrutiny.

it was the pj's own testimonies that convicted them

[stephen25000]

in reply to you both...the evidence against the PJ was overwhelming.....their claim that cipriano fell down the stairs was an obvious lie...the evidence against cipriano was non existent

Cipriano is a liar.

Proved in court, and from her varying testimony and changing accounts of events.

She deserves her sentence.

[stephen25000]

it was the pj's own testimonies that convicted them

Cipriano lied.

End of.