Yeah, my initial impression is they look trustworthy and respectful. Isn't this the same problem here too, so many on both sides of this debate commenting on the McCanns behaviour. For example, they appear so cold or on the other side - they are responsible, caring doctors and couldn't possibly do such things. No-one really knows, do they?
The fact of the McCanns being doctors cuts absolutely no ice as far as I am concerned. How they look physically or how the self appointed experts interpret their body language is of even less concern.
We have recently been appalled by the revelations that children are not safe from abuse either in their homes or public places from those employed to look after them.
A more extreme case than Michael and Lara Chase (described by detectives as 'every parent's worst nightmare') being the beheading of a Russian child by her nanny.
In all the cases brought to light and prosecuted there was evidence enough to secure convictions; when is the penny going to drop that despite the most intrusive and intensive scrutiny in history there is not one shred of evidence against either of the Drs McCann or their friends.
For going on nine years now people like Richard Hall have rehashed one nonsense after another. Being charitable -speculation - but in reality one untruth piled on another.
The 'fact' that the children were on their own is it ... but quite an industry has been established all based on the fabrications put about by a failing investigation ... "100% DNA" - cadaver dogs 'alerting' only to McCann in a town where no-one had ever died or had a bleed.