Richard Hall's film 'When Madeleine Died?' uploaded to YouTube 19th Feb

[Brietta]

...and we know where SY's endeavours have led..............

No we do not, Stephen.

[stephen25000]

No we do not, Stephen.

Have they found how Madeleine disappeared from the apartment ?

Have they found Madeleine ?

There are clear answers on both.

[Brietta]

Have they found how Madeleine disappeared from the apartment ?

Have they found Madeleine ?

There are clear answers on both.

Did I miss the press release giving out all the details of exactly what the police are doing in the active investigation into the case of a missing child?

[stephen25000]

Did I miss the press release giving out all the details of exactly what the police are doing in the active investigation into the case of a missing child?

I wonder how much of the £95,000 now remains ?

[xtina]

Did I miss the press release giving out all the details of exactly what the police are doing in the active investigation into the case of a missing child?

i think we only see that ...

when maddie is spotted somewhere .....etc etc

usually when other stuff being reported.....like what's happening with G A

[xtina]

latest update from Richard Hall......

even Clarence Mitchel describes ....the case as a Soap Opera...........




... link removed - SIL


we all no what a arguido is .....apparently C M .....doesn't..............


http://mumbrella.com.au/commscon-2016-clarence-mitchell-madeleine-mccann-359344

14 mins 25  secs] "

They were given this 'arguido status', as it's called in Portugal, it technically doesn't mean 'suspect', it doesn't mean 'suspect' in the sense of a serious crime, you can be given a parking ticket and you'd be an 'arguido', it means you're a person of interest to a police enquiry..."

[jassi]

i think we only see that ...

when maddie is spotted somewhere .....etc etc

usually when other stuff being reported.....like what's happening with G A

Indeed, the coincidence of the two events appearing almost simultaneous is amazing .

[Brietta]

latest update from Richard Hall......

even Clarence Mitchel describes ....the case as a Soap Opera...........




... link removed - SIL


we all no what a arguido is .....apparently C M .....doesn't..............


http://mumbrella.com.au/commscon-2016-clarence-mitchell-madeleine-mccann-359344

14 mins 25  secs] "

They were given this 'arguido status', as it's called in Portugal, it technically doesn't mean 'suspect', it doesn't mean 'suspect' in the sense of a serious crime, you can be given a parking ticket and you'd be an 'arguido', it means you're a person of interest to a police enquiry..."

Indeed, it really isn't too complicated a system once one gets used to the terminology.  However it is a pity that those such as Richard Hall have totally misunderstood or misinterpreted or even totally ignored the ramifications of being constituted arguido/a under the system.

That's fine as far as he is concerned but his deliberate promulgating of misinformation to others is more problematical.

Please note the emboldened text below.  None of the three arguidos in Madeleine's case were arrested and charged ... which under Portuguese law mean they have an entirely clean slate.

The same cannot be said of the fourth arguido (the assault on Leonor Cipriano, for which she was penalised by having her sentence extended) we associate with Madeleine's case.  He was indicted and was found guilty.

So if you consider Clarence Mitchell to be misinformed re arguido status in Portugal ... it could well be because he has watched too many Richard Hall videos.



**snip
Once a case file is completed, the police pass it to the public ministry, the equivalent of the crown prosecution service, which decides whether an "acusacao" or indictment is brought.

Portuguese authorities express caution against expecting that arrests or charges will automatically follow.

It is not uncommon for people caught up in criminal investigations in Portugal to declare themselves arguidos in order to receive more legal protection, particularly if they feel the line of questioning implies they are a suspect.

The ex-pat Briton, Robert Murat, was declared an arguido in the Madeleine case in May but has not been charged or formally arrested.
http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2007/sep/07/ukcrime.madeleinemccann2


**snip
Madeleine Cop Gets Suspended Sentence
22:28, UK, Friday 22 May 2009

Goncalo Amaral was convicted of perjury after an alleged attack on the mother of another missing girl.

http://news.sky.com/story/694940/madeleine-cop-gets-suspended-sentence

[xtina]

Indeed, the coincidence of the two events appearing almost simultaneous is amazing .

very true jassi................

.especially the SY pennies worth .........

if they are not careful they are going to make themselves a laughing stock


[6 mins 27 secs] "We have to be creative and intelligent about what we put out there.


its like R H says .they manipulate the media to there own gains ......suits them only when they want it

[misty]

very true jassi................

.especially the SY pennies worth .........

if they are not careful they are going to make themselves a laughing stock


[6 mins 27 secs] "We have to be creative and intelligent about what we put out there.


its like R H says .they manipulate the media to there own gains ......suits them only when they want it

Speaking of manipulating media, what's happened to the mccannpjfiles.co.uk?

[Brietta]

Speaking of manipulating media, what's happened to the mccannpjfiles.co.uk?

I'm back in at .co. and can navigate via site map.

[ChloeR]

Just having a look at what else he is promoting:

9/11:

Finding out who did 9/11 is NOT the secret they are trying to protect. The secret is so big that they would rather us believe it was done by a faction inside our government or even another government. Keeping us fighting over WHO did it and not looking at what was ACTUALLY done is the goal. Start knowing the TRUTH for yourself. Watch this in full and then GET THE BOOK! Dr. Judy Wood could not be better qualified to forensically and scientifically examine the evidence of the 9/11 attacks. The towers were turned to dust in mid air and were not destroyed using kinetic objects or weapons such as planes, bombs or nukes. The towers were processed with the weapon and turned to dust from within for a period before they collapsed. Watch steel turn to dust before your eyes.


---

7/7:

We have been covering the false flag attack on London known as 7/7 for a few years now. During that period more and more information has come to light, all of which points to and re-enforces the argument that the bombings were carried out by the authorities, not by Islamic terrorists. A catalogue of "smoking guns" is enough to persuade even the most closed minded person of this fact. The police investigation should have started (and should still start) with the arrest and questioning of "crisis management specialist" Peter Power. Yep - he certainly "managed" this "crisis", so he did. Most MPs are not informed about the facts of 7/7 and it is breathtaking to read some of their responses from the current Richplanet 7/7 campaign. Some are exhibiting pathological denial, including Nick Clegg.



---

 The London bombings which took place on 7th July 2005 killing 56 people were not carried out by young Muslims as stated in mainstream media. There is not a shred of evidence that would convict the four blamed for the attacks which is why under British law they are totally innocent. Once you look in detail at the facts of seven/seven it becomes abundantly clear that we have totally worthless news media reporting in the UK. The news media organisations are at least in part complicit in the bombings, as they have actively mis-reported the truth and mis-lead the public away from the true perpetrators of these murders.


---

UFOs:

The phenomenon of animal mutilation difficult to explain in conventional terms, and has been linked for decades with UFO’s, because strange lights are sometimes witnessed in proximity to sites where animal carcases are found. But have human beings suffered similar attacks? This film attempts to answer this very controversial question. Rumours about human mutilation have circulated the UFO community for years with some people claiming to have had contact with a military group which is used to acquire the corpses of victims of human mutilation. In the film we reveal the testimony of a black ops soldier, who was employed by a secret NATO “find and secure” military team. Their job is to search for and then protect sites where human mutilation has taken place. This programme is PART ONE. Part two follows in the next Richplanet show.


Hmmm.

Erm yeah, he seems quite sane eh :D

Having said that, at the risk of being called a crazy, I do believe in aliens/UFOs 

I can't get away with stuff like this, just the amount of people involved in the whole thing is insane. If Madeleine died earlier in the week, this means creche records and everything are faked..witnesses lied about seeing her and have never said anything since, etc etc. Its just not very plausible. 

[ShiningInLuz]

I have identified that the source of the weather chart in Mr Hall's video is weatherspark.com. 

It is for Faro airport.  weatherspark.com does not pick up Sagres weather station, and there is nothing it does pick up that is closer to Luz than Faro.  The next nearest is Beja airport, which is about 70 miles N of Faro.

weatherspark.com does appear to have some indication of cloudiness v sunniness.  It looks to be highly aggregated, and I can't extract anything that is anywhere hourly, certainly without signing up for a weather service that I don't want.

The provenance of Mr Hall's chart is that it appears to be based on a very similar chart developed by Peter Mac on another forum.  This confirms the idea raised earlier in this thread of Peter Mac's involvement and his acknowledgement that it based on Faro.

At weatherspark.com, you get more frequent information about wind direction and speed, and the bottom line is that the wind was never from Faro to Luz, though it often went the other way, giving an extremely crude indication of what had happened upwind at Luz.

On Wed 2 May 2007, the wind was basically from Sagres to Luz to Faro.  Sagres got 3mm of rain, Luz got enough to rain off the morning tennis, while Faro got roughly 0.1mm.

Basically, anyone trying to use the Faro weather to 'predict' the Luz weather is on very shaky ground.

So you can compare for yourself, here is a copy of a screencap, made by Carana, of Mr Hall's weather chart.  It covers 8 days.  I have put in an equivalent from weatherspark.com.  Mine only covers 3 days, and I have squeezed the width to match the same 3 days on Mr Hall's graphic.

There are differences in averaged or max/min figures, because I picked the data up this week and Peter Mac picked it up goodness only knows how far back.  But the ones that should not change - actual temperature, wind speed, wind direction - have not changed.

Another one bites the dust.

[Carana]

Well done, SIL.

I knew where the secondary source was, but not primary one.

I agree that the descriptions of the conditions simply don't appear to correspond to Luz on that day.

A bit of "wishful-thinking" editing between the source of the graph, Faro conditions and various people's opinions may account for this assumption, which was then the basic assumption for extrapolating further.

None of these conspiracy theories really helps discover the truth of what happened to Madeleine, and so I can't understand what their purpose actually is...

[Eleanor]

Well done, SIL.

I knew where the secondary source was, but not primary one.

I agree that the descriptions of the conditions simply don't appear to correspond to Luz on that day.

A bit of "wishful-thinking" editing between the source of the graph, Faro conditions and various people's opinions may account for this assumption, which was then the basic assumption for extrapolating further.

None of these conspiracy theories really helps discover the truth of what happened to Madeleine, and so I can't understand what their purpose actually is...

I can.  But I'm not supposed to say so.