Has Martin Smith Changed his Opinion ?

[pegasus]

Private detectives (not the English police) released them.

English police (who, themselves, had the efits in their possession for a considerable time before releasing them) chose the moment of the Crimewatch programme to release the Smith efits (Martin and Mary) publicly.

That's how English police work.

They always have.

In March 2010 (when there was no active police investigation) Mr Mitchell put a lot of work into circulating amongst the press the images of dozens of potential suspects, which were obtained from a police file. 

[ferryman]

In March 2010 (when there was no active police investigation) Mr Mitchell put a lot of work into circulating amongst the press the images of dozens of potential suspects, which were obtained from a police file.

But not the English police ....

[G-Unit]

But not the English police ....

Forget the English Police. The McCanns had the e-fits in November 2008. No police force had them. No police force was investigating the case. Why didn't the McCanns release the e-fits themselves????

[ferryman]

Forget the English Police. The McCanns had the e-fits in November 2008. No police force had them. No police force was investigating the case. Why didn't the McCanns release the e-fits themselves????

Why do you want to forget the only fact that matters?

The efits were passed on to Scotland Yard (English police) who, themselves, hung on to the efits for a considerable period before releasing them into the public domain.

Why?

Because that's how English police work.

ETA: there are (potentially) innocent reasons why, after an abduction, a parent or a couple might take (adoptive) custody of an abducted child.

There is no innocent explanation of an abduction.

The Smith efits (potentially) accuse someone named of an abduction.

[G-Unit]

Why do you want to forget the only fact that matters?

The efits were passed on to Scotland Yard (English police) who, themselves, hung on to the efits for a considerable period before releasing them into the public domain.

Why?

Because that's how English police work.

ETA: there are (potentially) innocent reasons why, after an abduction, a parent or a couple might take (adoptive) custody of an abducted child.

There is no innocent explanation of an abduction.

The Smith efits (potentially) accuse someone named of an abduction.

The Barcelona e-fits (potentially) accused someone of paying others to abduct a child for them. In both cases the people concerned could have innocent reasons for what they were doing. You are clutching at straws in your attempts to excuse the McCanns for not releasing the e-fits.

[ferryman]

The Barcelona e-fits (potentially) accused someone of paying others to abduct a child for them. In both cases the people concerned could have innocent reasons for what they were doing. You are clutching at straws in your attempts to excuse the McCanns for not releasing the e-fits.

Explain the innocent explanation for being caught red-handed abducting a child?

[slartibartfast]

Explain the innocent explanation for being caught red-handed abducting a child?

So you believe smithman is the abductor?

[ferryman]

So you believe smithman is the abductor?

It seems highly plausible.

[stephen25000]

Explain the innocent explanation for being caught red-handed abducting a child?

Is this the Barcelona episode involving the 'Victoria Beckham lookalike and who was in fact never investigated (Hall got that right in his first set of videos).

Revealing blatant incompetence by Mitchell, Edgar and Co., or of course a badly organised attempt to divert attention away from the mccanns.

[ferryman]

Is this the Barcelona episode involving the 'Victoria Beckham lookalike and who was in fact never investigated (Hall got that right in his first set of videos).

Revealing blatant incompetence by Mitchell, Edgar and Co., or of course a badly organised attempt to divert attention away from the mccanns.

Think you might be off-topic.

Has Martin Smith changed his opinion?

Yes.

[stephen25000]

Think you might be off-topic.

Has Martin Smith changed his opinion?

Yes.

So ferryman, very briefly, could Mitchell, Edgar, Cowley and Co., organize a pi## up in a brewery, or even a real professional investigation into a missing child, or was it an exercise in deflection from the mccanns ?

[G-Unit]

Explain the innocent explanation for being caught red-handed abducting a child?

You give me an innocent explanation for not immediately publicising two new e-fits of the potential abductor of your child.

[stephen25000]

You give me an innocent explanation for not immediately publicising two new e-fits of the potential abductor of your child.

There isn't any.


Not for finding their beloved daughter.

[G-Unit]

Think you might be off-topic.

Has Martin Smith changed his opinion?

Yes.

There is no evidence supporting your assertion.

[ferryman]

You give me an innocent explanation for not immediately publicising two new e-fits of the potential abductor of your child.

Have done so.

Ad nauseam.

Your turn.