Katie Hopkins - "I think it's finally time to speak out".

[Alfred R Jones]

Oh for goodness sake,  haven't you got it yet , simply a lot of people don't believe the mccanns and whilst they have every sympathy for Madeleine are sicked and tired of those two parents who clearly neglected their children being made icons in the press.

I get it - no need to lose your rag.

[stephen25000]

I get it - no need to lose your rag.

If I lost my rag, you would know, and I didn't there.

[Mr Gray]

Oh for goodness sake,  haven't you got it yet , simply a lot of people don't believe the mccanns and whilst they have every sympathy for Madeleine are sicked and tired of those two parents who clearly neglected their children being made icons in the press.

you are talking rubbish again....the comments did not show that people did not believe the McCanns....those who commented were critical of the children being left........they also did not blame the McCanns for Maddie's disappearance....they accepted Maddie was abducted but the McCanns should accept more blame for making it possible...you get such  a lot wrong

[stephen25000]

...and the article has not been removed, and no sign of accusations of libel either from the mccanns.

[Alfred R Jones]

...and the article has not been removed, and no sign of accusations of libel either from the mccanns.

It can take months to mount a libel action, just sayin' like.  That said, I doubt the McCanns will give Hopkins the satisfaction of being sued, she clearly enjoys the notoriety of it.  The very worst thing you can do to the ASW is ignore her IMO.

[stephen25000]

It can take months to mount a libel action, just sayin' like.  That said, I doubt the McCanns will give Hopkins the satisfaction of being sued, she clearly enjoys the notoriety of it.  The very worst thing you can do to the ASW is ignore her IMO.

Also the Mail obviously felt happy running the story.

I wonder why.

[ferryman]

Of course thousands of people agreed with her, as they do on many of the vile things she writes.  All it means is that there's lots of hateful people in the world, which we already knew.  I pity her poor kids, imagine having a mother like that intent on stirring up hatred at every available opportunity.  They must get ribbed about it mercilessly, unless she has chosen to home school them??

Surely you mean home-indoctrinate, Alfred?

I'm sure she does that, however they are educated.

[misty]

Ms Hopkins slammed the Junior Doctors as being greedy for wanting a little more cash & a little less stress for helping to save lives & caring for people. She deplored their unionised labour.
 Meanwhile, she continues to make her contribution to society by verbally abusing those less fortunate than herself whilst raking in the cash by doing so. How low does that make the people who praise her?

[mercury]

Ms Hopkins slammed the Junior Doctors as being greedy for wanting a little more cash & a little less stress for helping to save lives & caring for people. She deplored their unionised labour.
 Meanwhile, she continues to make her contribution to society by verbally abusing those less fortunate than herself whilst raking in the cash by doing so. How low does that make the people who praise her?

Ms Hopkins is an obnoxious offensive right wing etc etc etc

You are making two mistakes here

A) assuming her article is x y z and lumping it in with all her "usual antics"
B) assuming people praise her in totality (if at all praising her apart from speaking her mind) past and present and attempting to denigrate people who don't believe or have doubts about the "abduction" which is neither immoral or illegal

The only thing that is interesting is that the Mail have published this article

[Alfred R Jones]

Also the Mail obviously felt happy running the story.

I wonder why.

Sells papers, attracts website traffic, why do you think?  That is why "journalists" like Katie Hopkins exist. 

[G-Unit]

Ms Hopkins slammed the Junior Doctors as being greedy for wanting a little more cash & a little less stress for helping to save lives & caring for people. She deplored their unionised labour.
 Meanwhile, she continues to make her contribution to society by verbally abusing those less fortunate than herself whilst raking in the cash by doing so. How low does that make the people who praise her?

How dare she express, for once, an opinion which lots of people agree with? Silence her immediately!

[Alice Purjorick]

Ms Hopkins is an obnoxious offensive right wing etc etc etc

You are making two mistakes here

A) assuming her article is x y z and lumping it in with all her "usual antics"
B) assuming people praise her in totality (if at all praising her apart from speaking her mind) past and present and attempting to denigrate people who don't believe or have doubts about the "abduction" which is neither immoral or illegal

The only thing that is interesting is that the Mail have published this article

And that The Standard repeated it.

[Alfred R Jones]

*Godwins Law Klaxon*

Praising Katie Hopkins for this article and ignoring the rest is a bit like praising Hitler for Germany's economic recovery and ignoring the rest. 

IMO.

[stephen25000]

Sells papers, attracts website traffic, why do you think?  That is why "journalists" like Katie Hopkins exist.

Wow, I never realized that.

Truly amazing.

[mercury]

And that The Standard repeated it.

And did a poll to boot

I think DM owns part of the Standard....so probably has some clout


DM, the essential WUM newspaper, funny