Loving parents who have covered up the accidental death of a child

[Mr Gray]

Real parents who love their children, do not leave them in blatantly obvious vulnerable conditions.

Likewise, real parents who love their children, do not place their socializing over their children's welfare.

Yes they do...but not intentionally

[G-Unit]

Yes they do...but not intentionally

Any parent who can't imagine the potential for disaster with leaving small children home alone for up to 30 minutes is stupid or irresponsible.

[faithlilly]

Any parent who can't imagine the potential for disaster with leaving small children home alone for up to 30 minutes is stupid or irresponsible.

I often wonder if Madeleine had died in a fire that had taken hold during the half an hour between checks how differently the McCanns would be viewed. Would the supporters still be making excuses ?

[stephen25000]

I often wonder if Madeleine had died in a fire that had taken hold during the half an hour between checks how differently the McCanns would be viewed. Would the supporters still be making excuses ?

I presume they wouldn't dare.

[Alfred R Jones]

I often wonder if Madeleine had died in a fire that had taken hold during the half an hour between checks how differently the McCanns would be viewed. Would the supporters still be making excuses ?

Ah, there you are.  I created this thread so that you would be able to give me the many examples you have of seemingly loving parents covering up the tragic accidental death of a child and not risk being off topic.  I shall read about your many examples with interest.

[Alfred R Jones]

Real parents who love their children, do not leave them in blatantly obvious vulnerable conditions.

Likewise, real parents who love their children, do not place their socializing over their children's welfare.

So does that mean I don't have real parents who love me?   

[stephen25000]

So does that mean I don't have real parents who love me?   

Well going by your posts on this forum... 

[Alfred R Jones]

Well going by your posts on this forum... 

What does that mean exactly?  Kindly spell it out. 

[stephen25000]

What does that mean exactly?  Kindly spell it out.

You do know what humour is alfred ?

You apparently used it in your previous posts.

Or are you adverse to others using it ?

[slartibartfast]

once again you come in with an irrelevant comment to a discussion that has been taking place over the past 12 hours...read back and you will understand

It is not irrelevant, you stated that in general parents are loving, Alfie has spent quite a while trying to narrow down which parents he will count as loving so we take your input as a widening of that scope.

P.S. To read threads does not require posting to them (well for some of us).

[Alfred R Jones]

You do know what humour is alfred ?

You apparently used it in your previous posts.

Or are you adverse to others using it ?

Oh I see, you were being "funny" - ha. ha. ha.  FYI "real" parents can do stupid things that sometimes hurt the children that they love more than anything.   The papers are full of such tragedies.  I read about a parent who accidentally reversed over their child killing him instantly, are we to doubt the extent to which the parent loved their child because of this carelessness?  How about parents who feed their kids too much and have horribly overweight children that need gastric band surgery before their teens? Are they unloving or just a bit stupid?

[Alfred R Jones]

It is not irrelevant, you stated that in general parents are loving, Alfie has spent quite a while trying to narrow down which parents he will count as loving so we take your input as a widening of that scope.

P.S. To read threads does not require posting to them (well for some of us).

I have done no such thing.  Kindly retract.  I have clearly stated "loving or seemingly loving", why do you make stuff up?

[stephen25000]

Oh I see, you were being "funny" - ha. ha. ha.  FYI "real" parents can do stupid things that sometimes hurt the children that they love more than anything.   The papers are full of such tragedies.  I read about a parent who accidentally reversed over their child killing him instantly, are we to doubt the extent to which the parent loved their child because of this carelessness?  How about parents who feed their kids too much and have horribly overweight children that need gastric band surgery before their teens? Are they unloving or just a bit stupid?

Ah, that was the anticipated response.

FYI, the mccanns did this on 5 successive nights, and for all we know at other times as well, and would have continued to do so. The rank stupidity of leaving young children unattended can be seen in recent headlines, including some examples posted on here. Nothing you can say will take away the truth,  for the mccanns, socializing first, children second.

END OF.

[Mr Gray]

It is not irrelevant, you stated that in general parents are loving, Alfie has spent quite a while trying to narrow down which parents he will count as loving so we take your input as a widening of that scope.

P.S. To read threads does not require posting to them (well for some of us).

My posts have been in response to gunit and mistaken who are talking about parents in general

[Alfred R Jones]

Ah, that was the anticipated response.

FYI, the mccanns did this on 5 successive nights, and for all we know at other times as well, and would have continued to do so. The rank stupidity of leaving young children unattended can be seen in recent headlines, including some examples posted on here. Nothing you can say will take away the truth,  for the mccanns, socializing first, children second.

END OF.

Stephen Has Spoken: The McCanns are not real parents, nor loving.  END OF.