Katie Hopkins labels sex abuse victim 'a slag'!

[G-Unit]

[/b]
 
Proof that you DO partly blame the 15 year old victim in this case, she is certainly not blameless according to your paragraph above.

Either I'm very bad at saying what I mean or you're very bad at understanding my posts. I do try to be clear and you seem to be the only one who can't understand what I mean.

I was talking about the modern trend to see women as always innocent and men as always guilty as opposed to the opposite being true when I was young. Note WOMEN not girls.

I also talked about pedophiles not being attracted to teenage girls which makes accusing the footballer of being a pedophile incorrect.

I apologise if I confused you by discussing two different issues in the same paragraph.

The girl behaved foolishly. She did what teenage 'groupies' have always done; threw herself at someone she was infatuated with. Mature men know better than to get involved with such girls, (jail bait they used to call them) and  the infatuation passes with no-one getting hurt. In this case the man was also foolish and took it too far. As he is the one who was old enough to know better he is the one to blame. But he isn't a paedophile.

[Alfred R Jones]

Either I'm very bad at saying what I mean or you're very bad at understanding my posts. I do try to be clear and you seem to be the only one who can't understand what I mean.

I was talking about the modern trend to see women as always innocent and men as always guilty as opposed to the opposite being true when I was young. Note WOMEN not girls.

I also talked about pedophiles not being attracted to teenage girls which makes accusing the footballer of being a pedophile incorrect.

I apologise if I confused you by discussing two different issues in the same paragraph.

The girl behaved foolishly. She did what teenage 'groupies' have always done; threw herself at someone she was infatuated with. Mature men know better than to get involved with such girls, (jail bait they used to call them) and  the infatuation passes with no-one getting hurt. In this case the man was also foolish and took it too far. As he is the one who was old enough to know better he is the one to blame. But he isn't a paedophile.

Fabulous.  So now we have established that, unlike Katie Hopkins (who you earlier claimed to agree with) you actually DON'T blame the 15 year old victim in any way shape or form for the footballer's actions, nor do you believe she behaved like a slag, as Katie Hopkins does.  So, apart from your shared view re: the paedophile label being incorrectly applied, you don't actually agree with much of Hopkins' article at all! 

[G-Unit]

Fabulous.  So now we have established that, unlike Katie Hopkins (who you earlier claimed to agree with) you actually DON'T blame the 15 year old victim in any way shape or form for the footballer's actions, nor do you believe she behaved like a slag, as Katie Hopkins does.  So, apart from your shared view re: the paedophile label being incorrectly applied, you don't actually agree with much of Hopkins' article at all!

Perhaps I didn't state my position clearly enough for you to understand it.

[Alfred R Jones]

Perhaps I didn't state my position clearly enough for you to understand it.

Or maybe your position has shifted ever so slightly since you entered the fray.

[G-Unit]

Or maybe your position has shifted ever so slightly since you entered the fray.

No. All my posts have said the same things.

[stephen25000]

No. All my posts have said the same things.

Alfred may catch up eventually.

[Alfred R Jones]

No. All my posts have said the same things.

Yes that you both agree with and disagree with Katie Hopkins article simultaneously.

[Alice Purjorick]

"The test of a first rate intelligence is the ability to hold two opposed ideas in the mind at the same time, and still retain the ability to function".

F Scott Fitzgerald.

[Alfred R Jones]

"The test of a first rate intelligence is the ability to hold two opposed ideas in the mind at the same time, and still retain the ability to function".

F Scott Fitzgerald.

Your dogged support of everyone on this forum with a "sceptic" slant no matter what their pov is on other matters is most touching / most nauseating. 

 

[Alice Purjorick]

Your dogged support of everyone on this forum with a "sceptic" slant no matter what their pov is on other matters is most touching / most nauseating. 

 

I would have thought you realised by now just what is in my cross hairs and why ?.
The Fitzgerald quote was a pop at your post not particularly support of Stevo or G-Unit.

[ferryman]

In the UK the age of consent is 16

How far was this youngster from her 16th birthday?

[mercury]

In the UK the age of consent is 16

How far was this youngster from her 16th birthday?

About a year which makes him at 30 a perverted immoral s..mbag...obviously he doesnt  have daughters or sisters , if he does then he is a perverted s..mbag thrice over

[Alfred R Jones]

I would have thought you realised by now just what is in my cross hairs and why ?.
The Fitzgerald quote was a pop at your post not particularly support of Stevo or G-Unit.

Perhaps you could explain how it was a pop at my post, and not supportive of G-Unit? 

[ferryman]

It would seem this whole thing came to light because the young woman concerned boasted of it.

The law is that the legal age of consent is 16.

Then there is an age between 13 and 16 when (usually girls) are deemed capable of giving consent, are not legally permitted to do so.

Where there that occurs (and the court is satisfied consent was given) an offence has been committed, but less serious than rape.

That seems to be what Johnson is guilty of.

He has been unfaithful to his long-term girl-friend or wife.

But that is not a crime.

That is a strictly private matter between him and her.

I am no fan of Katie Hopkins.

But I (veer towards) her take on this issue.

I think the question of how close this girl was to her 16th birthday is crucial.

It is a measure of how far the footballer was from not breaking any laws at all.

[Alice Purjorick]

Perhaps you could explain how it was a pop at my post, and not supportive of G-Unit?

I will leave you to work that out for yourself, ace; it's there if you look hard enough.