Author Topic: Why didn't the dogs alert to any of Gerry's clothing?  (Read 112816 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Why didn't the dogs alert to any of Gerry's clothing?
« Reply #105 on: March 14, 2016, 10:25:42 PM »
You don't have to be a dog to smell a rat.

However, yku do need to know what you're talking about, and I'm afraid. Ferryman's googling does not make him an expert.

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: Why didn't the dogs alert to any of Gerry's clothing?
« Reply #106 on: March 14, 2016, 10:40:37 PM »
However, yku do need to know what you're talking about, and I'm afraid. Ferryman's googling does not make him an expert.

I googled as far as theMcCannpjfiles.com

I didn't need to do anything else.

Offline pegasus

Re: Why didn't the dogs alert to any of Gerry's clothing?
« Reply #107 on: March 14, 2016, 11:24:18 PM »
And clothing Eddie could find no hint of a trace of scent on in the villa was packed into bog-standard cardboard boxes (with zero regard to principles of cross-contamination) for a second inspection at the gym.

And lo!

Clothing devoid of scent (discernible to Eddie) in the villa suddenly yields a scent (he can detect) in the gym.

All most odd ....
In villa video Eddie sniffs a pile of clothes then barks.

Offline pegasus

Re: Why didn't the dogs alert to any of Gerry's clothing?
« Reply #108 on: March 14, 2016, 11:28:33 PM »
I noted the size of the tee-shirt (as did several other people) ....
But Ferryman why not read the label? The label that says "height 98cm"

Offline misty

Re: Why didn't the dogs alert to any of Gerry's clothing?
« Reply #109 on: March 14, 2016, 11:58:46 PM »
In villa video Eddie sniffs a pile of clothes then barks.

Are you implying that the handler misread an alert?

Offline pegasus

Re: Why didn't the dogs alert to any of Gerry's clothing?
« Reply #110 on: March 15, 2016, 01:51:50 AM »
Are you implying that the handler misread an alert?
I watch where the dog's nose is just before the bark Misty and make my own deduction.
There are 2 alerts on video at that property IMO and they are -
1. nose pointing at seat of dining chair but table blocks our view of what is on seat of dining chair.
2. nose pointing at one particular pile of clothes on sideboard.

Offline misty

Re: Why didn't the dogs alert to any of Gerry's clothing?
« Reply #111 on: March 15, 2016, 02:03:20 AM »
I watch where the dog's nose is just before the bark Misty and make my own deduction.
There are 2 alerts on video at that property IMO and they are -
1. nose pointing at seat of dining chair but table blocks our view of what is on seat of dining chair.
2. nose pointing at one particular pile of clothes on sideboard.

I agree. Problem is, Pegasus - who put the clothes in piles ready to be boxed up?

Offline pegasus

Re: Why didn't the dogs alert to any of Gerry's clothing?
« Reply #112 on: March 15, 2016, 02:21:55 AM »
I agree. Problem is, Pegasus - who put the clothes in piles ready to be boxed up?
Panorama - earlier same day many clothes etc are drying on racks on patio just outside dining area.
I assume the residents then brought them in through patio door to dining area to iron and fold.

Offline misty

Re: Why didn't the dogs alert to any of Gerry's clothing?
« Reply #113 on: March 15, 2016, 03:00:09 AM »
Panorama - earlier same day many clothes etc are drying on racks on patio just outside dining area.
I assume the residents then brought them in through patio door to dining area to iron and fold.

Rather like 5a & the Scenic, the PJ/Grime/Harrison were the last people who had control of the clothes the dogs alerted to. The PJ arrived at about 5pm, the McCann family left the premises.
Interestingly, RM was present at Casa Liliana during the canine examinations.


3rd August....The police returned our clothes to us later that day, thrown into big black bin bags. ....creased to hell.
(Madeleine page 207)
Did the PJ seriously not keep any of the articles alerted to by Eddie as potential evidence?

Offline pegasus

Re: Why didn't the dogs alert to any of Gerry's clothing?
« Reply #114 on: March 15, 2016, 03:07:06 AM »
Rather like 5a & the Scenic, the PJ/Grime/Harrison were the last people who had control of the clothes the dogs alerted to. The PJ arrived at about 5pm, the McCann family left the premises.
Interestingly, RM was present at Casa Liliana during the canine examinations.


3rd August....The police returned our clothes to us later that day, thrown into big black bin bags. ....creased to hell.
(Madeleine page 207)
Did the PJ seriously not keep any of the articles alerted to by Eddie as potential evidence?
Maybe it's allowed for one person or their representative to stay?

Offline Benice

Re: Why didn't the dogs alert to any of Gerry's clothing?
« Reply #115 on: March 15, 2016, 09:10:32 AM »
Eddie goes in first looking for evidence of death not evidence of a shaving cut. His job is to find cadaver scent. Keela the blood dog is only used if he alerts.

Are you seriously claiming that Eddie would not have alerted to blood from a shaving cut - if a trace of it had been left in one of the apartments he was searching ?   Surely not.


The notion that innocence prevails over guilt – when there is no evidence to the contrary – is what separates civilization from barbarism.    Unfortunately, there are remains of barbarism among us.    Until very recently, it headed the PJ in Portimão. I hope he was the last one.
                                               Henrique Monteiro, chief editor, Expresso, Portugal

Offline Brietta

Re: Why didn't the dogs alert to any of Gerry's clothing?
« Reply #116 on: March 15, 2016, 12:58:50 PM »
Maybe it's allowed for one person or their representative to stay?

Might it have been dependent on Robert Murat's arguido status which gave him rights the McCanns the McCann's did not have at the time?
Also it should be considered that the intervention of the British dogs was viewed by them as a step forward towards discovering what had happened to Madeleine.

I think the endless discussion of 'the dogs' is a redundant one for the simple reason everything relating to their inspections is open to challenge from the comparison of inspection times allowed in the apartments to the delivery of the hire car to the garage.
Unlike the fiasco of Cipriano, I doubt very much if it would ever have been allowed to be heard in court and had it been it would have been shredded under cross examination.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: Why didn't the dogs alert to any of Gerry's clothing?
« Reply #117 on: March 15, 2016, 03:17:27 PM »
Eddie goes in first looking for evidence of death not evidence of a shaving cut. His job is to find cadaver scent. Keela the blood dog is only used if he alerts.

Quote
There is always a possibility of contamination of odours by transferral. EVRD does not make a distinction; he responds with a certain behaviour for which he was trained when he recognizes an odour. He does not identify the reasons for the presence of the odour nor does he identify suspects. Forensic confirmation and specialized investigation methods will determine the reasons and the suspicions. In order to undoubtedly affirm there must be a confirmation of the alert signals made by the dog.

(Martin Grime, rogatory interview).

If I understand Grime right, Eddie doesn't 'look for evidence' of anything; he merely seeks out a scent he has been trained to react to, and barks (his trained reaction to that scent) if he detects it.

Or did (RIP) .....

Offline jassi

Re: Why didn't the dogs alert to any of Gerry's clothing?
« Reply #118 on: March 15, 2016, 03:27:56 PM »
(Martin Grime, rogatory interview).

If I understand Grime right, Eddie doesn't 'look for evidence' of anything; he merely seeks out a scent he has been trained to react to, and barks (his trained reaction to that scent) if he detects it.

Or did (RIP) .....

Quite right, he smells for evidence of death.  The forensic boys and girls then try to find physical evidence to support that finding.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Why didn't the dogs alert to any of Gerry's clothing?
« Reply #119 on: March 15, 2016, 06:07:20 PM »
Are you seriously claiming that Eddie would not have alerted to blood from a shaving cut - if a trace of it had been left in one of the apartments he was searching ?   Surely not.

Eddie doesn't sniff every inch of the apartment searching for traces of blood. He would be in there for days. He goes in first to find cadaver scent.
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.