Author Topic: Aftermath of the Leveson Inquiry  (Read 180941 times)

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: Aftermath of the Leveson Inquiry
« Reply #75 on: April 06, 2016, 04:35:49 PM »
The press are at liberty to pose legitimate questions and are presently engaged in doing so regarding the Prime Minister's late father and how the PM himself may have benefited from tax evasion in his inheritance.

The press intrusion regarding the McCanns was illegitimate and libellous.  I am surprised you appear to condone the lies and pejorative innuendo they were forced to suffer as a result.

Steady on; although there is no libel of the dead. I suspect what Cameron senior did was Tax Avoidance.
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: Aftermath of the Leveson Inquiry
« Reply #76 on: April 06, 2016, 04:37:28 PM »
Is there anyone who is unaware of the McCann's pain? I recommend reading the foreword to her book, the pain is well documented. A lot of it being caused by other people being less than sympathetic, it seems.

ordeal
great distress
crimes against our family
pain
injustices
criticism
suffering terribly
despair
i

A pretty modest list.

To first lose your daughter, then be accused of murdering her, when (in reality) you have no clue of her fate is a trying ordeal (to say the least of it). 

But then to be mocked while enduring these things adds to the pain and anguish ...

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: Aftermath of the Leveson Inquiry
« Reply #77 on: April 06, 2016, 04:39:05 PM »
Steady on; although there is no libel of the dead. I suspect what Cameron senior did was Tax Avoidance.

Tax avoidance is legal

Tax evasion is not.

Offline Brietta

Re: Aftermath of the Leveson Inquiry
« Reply #78 on: April 06, 2016, 04:39:43 PM »
Misinterpretation again.  It is not my concern what the media write about anyone - other than myself, of course.

If the media should libel you at some time in the future the government inaction which the signatories to the open letter are highlighting, will prevent you accessing the low-cost justice that Leveson intended and as agreed by all parties in the Commons.

Rather than some individuals working themselves into a lather about Gerry McCann's involvement in exposing alleged political duplicity ... they should perhaps be giving a passing thought to the events which have led to the necessity for doing so.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: Aftermath of the Leveson Inquiry
« Reply #79 on: April 06, 2016, 04:44:46 PM »
Tax avoidance is legal

Tax evasion is not.

You don't say.
I never knew that.
Next contestant Charon; University of Life; specialist subject stating the bleedin' obvious.
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline Eleanor

Re: Aftermath of the Leveson Inquiry
« Reply #80 on: April 06, 2016, 04:48:38 PM »
You don't say.
I never knew that.
Next contestant Charon; University of Life; specialist subject stating the bleedin' obvious.

You could try assaying something pertinent.

Offline Brietta

Re: Aftermath of the Leveson Inquiry
« Reply #81 on: April 06, 2016, 04:53:22 PM »
Steady on; although there is no libel of the dead. I suspect what Cameron senior did was Tax Avoidance.

LOL there is no suggestion that the PM's father did anything illegal by his use of tax avoidance; however just a bit of embarrassment must have been caused (or perhaps not) when he apparently has benefited from a practice he once seemed to deplore.

**snip
The prime minister has prided himself on leading a global crackdown on tax avoidance and evasion, but the leak of millions of pages of files from the Panamanian agent Mossack Fonseca has put him on the back foot.
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/2d9d9910-fb3a-11e5-b3f6-11d5706b613b.html#axzz453tfLFAX
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline xtina

Re: Aftermath of the Leveson Inquiry
« Reply #82 on: April 06, 2016, 04:59:20 PM »
So you believe that Madeleine was in some way demised at the hands of her parents.  Why would you believe that when there is no evidence?

Why would you believe that The Media has some right to suggest this?

I do so understand your defence of The PJ.  And might even admire you for doing so.  But The Media has no right to foreguess this.

So you believe that Madeleine was in some way demised at the hands of her parents.  Why would you believe that when there is no evidence?



yes...... i do......... .either way ....the responsibility was theres..the choice was theirs...

they have never accepted that for some reason ....they just go on destroying peoples lives ....

because they expect everyone to pay for what they did in the first place...

i know you can say they are paying for it now ...but are they .....what exactly are they paying for ....

look at this pic ....is it a check for the lottery or what ....that would have had most people on there knees

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-X2fGIo3JAi8/Tucx8kVAjbI/AAAAAAAAITw/DB0g6IMKHk8/s1600/gerry_kate+-tshirt.jpg



as for evidence ........there is nothing to show either ...you are right ...or i am wrong....



Always listen to both sides of the story before you judge.

The first storyteller you will always find has modified the story, for there benefit BE WISE.

Offline xtina

Re: Aftermath of the Leveson Inquiry
« Reply #83 on: April 06, 2016, 05:16:21 PM »
Is there anyone who is unaware of the McCann's pain? I recommend reading the foreword to her book, the pain is well documented. A lot of it being caused by other people being less than sympathetic, it seems.

ordeal
great distress
crimes against our family
pain
injustices
criticism
suffering terribly
despair
i

spot on G-Unit

the i at the bottom .........could mean. i........... myself ..........and me

nothing much was mentioned about maddie's plight .............anyway.......or ever has been
Always listen to both sides of the story before you judge.

The first storyteller you will always find has modified the story, for there benefit BE WISE.

Offline Eleanor

Re: Aftermath of the Leveson Inquiry
« Reply #84 on: April 06, 2016, 05:28:58 PM »
So you believe that Madeleine was in some way demised at the hands of her parents.  Why would you believe that when there is no evidence?



yes...... i do......... .either way ....the responsibility was theres..the choice was theirs...

they have never accepted that for some reason ....they just go on destroying peoples lives ....

because they expect everyone to pay for what they did in the first place...

i know you can say they are paying for it now ...but are they .....what exactly are they paying for ....

look at this pic ....is it a check for the lottery or what ....that would have had most people on there knees

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-X2fGIo3JAi8/Tucx8kVAjbI/AAAAAAAAITw/DB0g6IMKHk8/s1600/gerry_kate+-tshirt.jpg



as for evidence ........there is nothing to show either ...you are right ...or i am wrong....

You have become a bit more incandescent as time goes by.  And I really feel for you. Your posts are becoming just too much.
Was there never any fault of Goncalo Amaral?

Offline slartibartfast

Re: Aftermath of the Leveson Inquiry
« Reply #85 on: April 06, 2016, 05:40:34 PM »
So your position seems to be that if you choose to use the media to highlight your daughter's disappearance then you must accept it lying down when the media will try its best to destroy your reputation and subject you to a string of innacurate and innuendo-laden articles.  Correct?

If you lie down with dogs, you will get up with fleas.
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: Aftermath of the Leveson Inquiry
« Reply #86 on: April 06, 2016, 05:48:33 PM »
You could try assaying something pertinent.

If you look a few posts up you will find I did re Brietta referring to Cameron Srs tax evasion when it should have read avoidance..
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: Aftermath of the Leveson Inquiry
« Reply #87 on: April 06, 2016, 05:52:04 PM »
LOL there is no suggestion that the PM's father did anything illegal by his use of tax avoidance; however just a bit of embarrassment must have been caused (or perhaps not) when he apparently has benefited from a practice he once seemed to deplore.

**snip
The prime minister has prided himself on leading a global crackdown on tax avoidance and evasion, but the leak of millions of pages of files from the Panamanian agent Mossack Fonseca has put him on the back foot.
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/2d9d9910-fb3a-11e5-b3f6-11d5706b613b.html#axzz453tfLFAX

Jimmy Carr must be laughing his socks off.
I have no problem with tax avoidance as it is enshrined in EU law that an individual is entitled to pay as little tax as is legally allowable.
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline Brietta

Re: Aftermath of the Leveson Inquiry
« Reply #88 on: April 06, 2016, 06:18:19 PM »
Jimmy Carr must be laughing his socks off.
I have no problem with tax avoidance as it is enshrined in EU law that an individual is entitled to pay as little tax as is legally allowable.

It becomes a slight problem for one who is on record decrying it when it is revealed he may have benefited directly from an inheritance from an assiduous expert when it came to tax avoidance.

However, I think we should probably go back to discussing the topic of the thread now.  Leveson.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Erngath

Re: Aftermath of the Leveson Inquiry
« Reply #89 on: April 06, 2016, 06:28:33 PM »
So you believe that Madeleine was in some way demised at the hands of her parents.  Why would you believe that when there is no evidence?



yes...... i do......... .either way ....the responsibility was theres..the choice was theirs...

they have never accepted that for some reason ....they just go on destroying peoples lives ....

because they expect everyone to pay for what they did in the first place...

i know you can say they are paying for it now ...but are they .....what exactly are they paying for ....

look at this pic ....is it a check for the lottery or what ....that would have had most people on there knees

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-X2fGIo3JAi8/Tucx8kVAjbI/AAAAAAAAITw/DB0g6IMKHk8/s1600/gerry_kate+-tshirt.jpg



as for evidence ........there is nothing to show either ...you are right ...or i am wrong....



To say the McCanns " just go on destroying people's lives" seems a tad melodramatic to me and possibly libellous.

I am interested to know if  a statement like this is allowed on this forum.
Deal with the failings of others as gently as with your own.