I take it if you were 'involved' in a crime, the police investigated and found insufficient evidence to charge you, the prosecution service agreed there was insufficient evidence to take you to court, that you should be dragged into court anyway.
I prefer the current system.
I also prefer that system, when it works ! however, I am making the argument, and commenting on: that there were reasons other than "no evidence" (as there clearly is plenty of evidence of abandonment). It has been mentioned that there were other reasons for not charging the Tapas with abandonment, many mentioned.
The other argument is would this no evidence mantra stand up in a court of law I would suggest not. And I have given reasons for my belief in previous posts.
Many other people are questioning why they were not charged with abandonment, or that this was not investigated properly to show evidence. I blame the circus and the 'victim status' of the parents. There is evidence that they failed to protect their daughter, and facilitated her disappearance by not being there,the risk assessment of what they did was huge! a temporary abandonment per say could lead to all sorts of harm- one of them being worst case scenario child being abducted? by Paedophiles?