Author Topic: "We must reconstruct Maddie’s fateful night" says former Portuguese police chief.  (Read 190821 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

stephen25000

  • Guest
He did not inform that phone call was being recorded and would be shared
11 hours of video and the idiot does not understand the alerts

Well let's see if SY take action. 8((()*/

Offline Admin

Regular posters are well aware of our rules by now so there is no excuse for posting disparaging or derogatory comments.  Continued flaunting of forum posting privileges will attract sanctions.

Admin

What law has he broken ?

It seems he is clearly unaware the dogs indications were neither confirmed or dismissed.

I was under the impression the dog alerts were not corroborated AND dismissed.

stephen25000

  • Guest
I was under the impression the dog alerts were not corroborated AND dismissed.

So why do they concern both the mccanns and their supporters ?

So why do they concern both the mccanns and their supporters ?
What do you mean why do they concern the Mccanns and their supporters?...do they?

stephen25000

  • Guest
What do you mean why do they concern the Mccanns and their supporters?...do they?

Oh dear.

That is a classic.


Offline Brietta

Stories change don't they brietta.

..and we know how stories changed from the onset of this case, don't we.

Actually we know nothing ... and I do wish you could find it within yourself to a least pay lip service to the title of the particular thread you are posting on.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Brietta

Not true Brietta. Kate in her very first statement said that immediately as entered the children's bedroom the curtains were open as were the windows and shutters. No whooshing of curtains. Of course by the 10th of May timeline Kate would have been aware that if, as they claimed, Tannerman was the abductor Matthew would have seen the open curtains, window and shutters on his 9.30 visit too, which of course he didn't and thus the miraculous closing of the curtains. Similarly Gerry opening the door with his key. By his 10th of May interview he will have realised that if Tannerman was already in the apartment at his 9.15 visit, as he claimed, he would have to have seen the open bedroom window as he passed it to get to the main door. And yet again the story changes.

 ... and Mr Amaral's proposed reconstruction of the night would have sorted that assessment out in which way?
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline pathfinder73

I was under the impression the dog alerts were not corroborated AND dismissed.

Keela found evidence. Nothing has been dismissed. Forensics not proving anything is nothing unusual. Ask Adrian Prout. Somobody deleted my blood dog 18 month experiment amazing results at detecting cleaned up blood.
« Last Edit: May 07, 2016, 01:09:56 PM by pathfinder73 »
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline Carana

Keela found evidence. Nothing has been dismissed. Forensics not proving anything is nothing unusual. Ask Adrian Prout. Somobody deleted my blood dog 18 month experiment amazing results at detecting cleaned up blood.

I must have missed it: what evidence (and of what significance) did Keela find?

Offline faithlilly

... and Mr Amaral's proposed reconstruction of the night would have sorted that assessment out in which way?

You claimed that the couple McCann had changed nothing with regards to their account of the night of the 3rd. I was merely pointing out that you are factually incorrect.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline pathfinder73

I must have missed it: what evidence (and of what significance) did Keela find?

That is intelligence e.g. both dogs alerted behind the sofa and evidence was found. Crime scene photos show one of the curtains trapped behind the sofa indicating it was pushed back in a hurry to try and cover up that spot. A strong case is not just based on dog alerts.
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

 8(*(
Keela found evidence. Nothing has been dismissed. Forensics not proving anything is nothing unusual. Ask Adrian Prout. Somobody deleted my blood dog 18 month experiment amazing results at detecting cleaned up blood.

Keela 'found' nothing of the sort. There are no forensics to back that claim up.

Offline pathfinder73

8(*(
Keela 'found' nothing of the sort. There are no forensics to back that claim up.

It is not unusual.

'Keela' The Crime Scene Investigation (C.S.I.) dog will search for and locate human blood to such small proportions that it is unlikely to be recovered by the forensic science procedures in place at this time due to its size or placement.
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.