Has support for the McCanns and Goncalo Amaral reached cult status?

[stephen25000]

LOL what mantra are you talking about?    You asked for a cite and I gave you a cite.   And you didn't even say thankyou.

If you want to know why Sharon Osbourne believes Madeleine was abducted - you need to ask her not me.

In other words, you don't know.

When did she use the word 'abduction' by the way ?

[Benice]

In other words, you don't know.

When did she use the word 'abduction' by the way ?

I have never claimed to know what Sharon Osbourne's reasons are to believe ''Maddie was taken.''  You asked for a cite and I gave you one.   The end.

In the context of what Sharon was saying  - if you don't believe that 'Maddie was taken'  means the same as  'Maddie was abducted' - then you need to explain why.

[stephen25000]

I have never claimed to know what Sharon Osbourne's reasons are to believe ''Maddie was taken.''  You asked for a cite and I gave you one.   The end.

In the context of what Sharon was saying  - if you don't believe that 'Maddie was taken'  means the same as  'Maddie was abducted' - then you need to explain why.

Why do I need to explain why ?

She did not use the word abducted, did she ?

[Benice]

Why do I need to explain why ?

She did not use the word abducted, did she ?

She said ''Maddie was taken''   - so what do you think Sharon meant by that - if she didn't mean 'abducted'.  Do tell.

[Mr Gray]

Why do I need to explain why ?

She did not use the word abducted, did she ?

Its called semantics...do keep up

[stephen25000]

She said ''Maddie was taken''   - so what do you think Sharon meant by that - if she didn't mean 'abducted'.  Do tell.

You are playing with words .

Now answer the point in my last post as regards lack of evidence as regards accidental death.

You have yet to answer that once.

So here goes, do you accept that even without the forensic corroboration, there is the possibility of accidental death.

YES or NO  ?

[Angelo222]

You are playing with words .

Now answer the point in my last post as regards lack of evidence as regards accidental death.

You have yet to answer that once.

So here goes, do you accept that even without the forensic corroboration, there is the possibility of accidental death.

YES or NO  ?

...and this relates to cult status how exactly?

[stephen25000]

So back to the original thread title dave.

Do you aprove of those cultists who support the mccanns or Amaral ?

[Mr Gray]

So back to the original thread title dave.

Do you aprove of those cultists who support the mccanns or Amaral ?

what cultists...I think the whole threads a load of absolute tosh...

[Mr Gray]

Why should it goad you dave ?

You were quite happy to call other people trolls who don't support the mccanns.

no I wasn't...more tosh....I have no problem with people not supporting the mccanns ...I think those who post the mccanns should suffer for the rest of their miserable lives...are more than a bit sad...that's a troll

[ShiningInLuz]

Don't be surprised to wake up and find this thread is a lot shorter.

Goading = deleted.

Stop goading.

[mercury]

no I wasn't...more tosh....I have no problem with people not supporting the mccanns ...I think those who post the mccanns should suffer for the rest of their miserable lives...are more than a bit sad...that's a troll

how many people have said that? Then

[Wonderfulspam]

how many people have said that? Then

One, & she's dead (right).

[mercury]

One, & she's dead (right).

exactly, just the one person but, made out to be some swarm of locusts somehow by the embroidery of facts club

a common occurrence in "cults"

Misrepresenting the facts and demonising and worse

[slartibartfast]

One, & she's dead (right).

I was thinking there was another who used the phrase but I don't think Davel is calling her a troll.