Gif removed as could be considered goading.
Do I believe the police shot Shelia? No! Do I believe Shelia was found on the bed? No! Do I Believe Jeremy has a daughter? No!
Julies testimony contradicts the facts of the crime, its the same false information police gave AE and Robert Boutflour. You know this and you still try to peddle Julie as a credible witness, I simply cannot take you seriously while you attempt to do this.
One day you will realise the opposite is the case.
Big deal you reject some of Mike's most outrageous claims but you still advance many other claims of his including some absurd ones like suggesting multiple moderators were doctored and multiple rifles used. You spent weeks insisting that Jeapes supported the murder weapon being in the masterbedroom window like Mike insisted even though compelling evidence proved she was looking at the kitchen side of the house and could not have seen in the bedroom window and her own account described the boxroom window. Rejecting some of the most absurd ones doesn't save you from making many of the same arguments Mike does nor does such make your allegations reasonable/supported by evidence.
Contrary to your claim not a single material claim made by Julie has been proven false. Julie's testimony consisted of 2 categories. 1) what Jeremy told her before the murders and 2) what Jeremy told her after the murders. She didn't say that Jeremy hired a hitman she said that Jeremy told her he hired a hitman. In order to prove she lied you need to prove that Jeremy didin't tell her such. You have provided zilch to discredit Julie's accounts of Jeremy telling her he wanted to kill his family and what he was planning to do. You have produced nothing to discredit her claim that he said tonight is the night to her during the phone call before the murders. Her testimony about his plotting was the most important testimony she gave. he claims he made after the murders were not nearly as significant because he didn't tell her much and largely lied.
You totally ignore the most significant testimony about how he was planning the murders and said tonight is the night. You ignore that Jeremy called her before he even called police which supports her. It supports her in 2 distinct ways. 1) if Jeremy genuinely received the distress call he claimed then he would have immediately rushed over or immediately have dialed 999 not have called Julie. 2) that he did call Julie first supported that he was confiding in her. Both of these support Julie.
Now let's look at the lie that you erroneously claim proves Julie a liar. Julie said that after the murders Jeremy told her he didn't carry out the murders personally as he had been planning but rather hired MM to kill them. Police investigated and determined it was a lie that Jeremy had hired MM to kill them. The police said that Jeremy lied to Julie. Julie also says that Jeremy must have lied to her when he said MM did it. You say that Julie had to be lying about Jeremy telling her such and made it up herself.
You have zero evidence that she is the one who made up the lie as opposed to Jeremy making it up and telling it to her as she claimed. Your position is simply that since it is a lie that MM was involved that she must have made up the lie herself. You totally ignore the possibility of Jeremy making up the lie and just declare she made it up.
A rational inquiry though would be to look at who would have a reason to make up the lie and why one would make it up.
You say Julie lied to get Jeremy in trouble. If she wanted to lie to get Jeremy in trouble she would say he admitted he carried out the murders himself. She knew he had no alibi so had no need to make up that he had hired a hitman. If she were going to make up the lie he hired a hitman she would have said he failed to name a hitman. Making up that he took money out of the bank to give to a hitman would be bad enough since bank records would prove it never happened but it would be even more foolish to name someone who would be able to prove they had an alibi and thus prove you a liar. So there is no advantage of any kind in her making up the story. On the other hand there are several advantages to Jeremy to make up such a lie.
1) Jeremy didn't want her to know how cold blooded he truly was so said he hired someone he didn't personally do it
2) Jeremy told her that she had better keep quiet because the hitman would get her if she talked. He used the lie to try to keep her quiet.
3) If the fear of the hitman failed to silence her and she did come forward with the story it would not hurt him because it was a lie. He could prove he didn't take out 2500 pounds from his account to give to anyone, MM would deny it and would be able to alibi himself and Jeremy would allege Julie was just lying to get back at him for breaking up with her and hopefully police would believe nothing else she said about the planning prior to the murders.
Quite clearly the only one with a reason to make up the story about MM was Jeremy. You have not come forward with any reason why Julie would make up such. she simply would have said Jeremy told her he committed the murders himself not made up a hitman story that would easily be proven false.
You are doing exactly what Jeremy wanted. He hoped that people would believe she made up the lie about MM and that nothing else she said was credible either even though he is the one who clearly made it up. That you fall for Jeremy's nonsense hook line and sinker is one reason why I doubt your supposed scientific breakthrough is anything more than your biased imagination at work.
