Author Topic: Libel ....  (Read 47300 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Libel ...
« Reply #165 on: June 03, 2016, 01:46:27 PM »
If the parents (last witnesses) aren't suspects then they aren't doing their job. They aren't going to tell us who the prime suspects are for obvious reasons.

Even the PJ knew enough to say the McCanns weren't suspects when they were. SY are alleged to be superior to them, so surely they would know to do that also?
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Libel ....
« Reply #166 on: June 03, 2016, 02:01:46 PM »
the open window and shutter is evidence of an possible  intruder.

so evidence which is more than we can say for the dog alerts

Offline jassi

Re: Libel ....
« Reply #167 on: June 03, 2016, 02:04:53 PM »
so evidence which is more than we can say for the dog alerts

I see no difference, as neither were confirmed by forensic evidence.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Libel ...
« Reply #168 on: June 03, 2016, 02:06:04 PM »
Even the PJ knew enough to say the McCanns weren't suspects when they were. SY are alleged to be superior to them, so surely they would know to do that also?
it isnt just what SY  have said it is the lack of evidence and m,any...many more facts which lead me to know that the mccanns were not involved

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: Libel ...
« Reply #169 on: June 03, 2016, 02:40:38 PM »
it isnt just what SY  have said it is the lack of evidence and m,any...many more facts which lead me to know that the mccanns were not involved

many = a large number
many many = the large number squared

say many = 15 then many many = 225
Just give us 8.88 % (20) of the facts which demonstrate the McCanns were not involved.
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Libel ...
« Reply #170 on: June 03, 2016, 02:49:22 PM »
many = a large number
many many = the large number squared

say many = 15 then many many = 225
Just give us 8.88 % (20) of the facts which demonstrate the McCanns were not involved.

many ...many is not many squared its a figure of speech indicating an imprecise large number...remember I studied S level maths

Offline jassi

Re: Libel ....
« Reply #171 on: June 03, 2016, 02:57:17 PM »
That would be many, many years ago  ?{)(**
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Libel ....
« Reply #172 on: June 03, 2016, 02:58:56 PM »
That would be many, many years ago  ?{)(**

it was...although it only seems yesterday

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: Libel ...
« Reply #173 on: June 03, 2016, 03:07:00 PM »
many ...many is not many squared its a figure of speech indicating an imprecise large number...remember I studied S level maths

Did you pass ? Am I supposed to be impressed ?

That aside, just a few out the many many figure of speech will do.
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: Libel ...
« Reply #174 on: June 03, 2016, 03:09:27 PM »
many ...many is not many squared its a figure of speech indicating an imprecise large number...remember I studied S level maths

You should find it a breeze to answer post 157 then.
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline Brietta

Re: Libel ...
« Reply #175 on: June 03, 2016, 06:56:57 PM »
You should find it a breeze to answer post 157 then.

Please don't start this silly nonsense again.  Thread topic is LIBEL.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline jassi

Re: Libel ....
« Reply #176 on: June 03, 2016, 07:02:26 PM »
A supporter's wet dream  @)(++(*
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: Libel ...
« Reply #177 on: June 03, 2016, 07:14:57 PM »
Please don't start this silly nonsense again.  Thread topic is LIBEL.

I was asking for a cite from Mr Davel to back up his assertion as per forum rules. His post 142 and my post 157 refer.
Are you saying I can't do that? How does that work then ?
Is it now a free for all where we all make unsubstantiated assertions and pass them off as the truth.? Or only some are allowed to do so?
The correct figure is 1 in 610,000 btw well documented on that tinternet.
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Libel ...
« Reply #178 on: June 03, 2016, 07:27:04 PM »
Did you pass ? Am I supposed to be impressed ?

That aside, just a few out the many many figure of speech will do.
Nope

Offline mercury

Re: Libel ....
« Reply #179 on: June 04, 2016, 12:40:21 AM »
What is libel?

And what isn't it?

Discuss.

55
Libel is a lie that reduces someones reputation etc etc
Ergo you have to prove someone was deliberately lying when writing somethng

http://dictionary.law.com/default.aspx?selected=1153

Libel it seems has to be proven by the plantiff too

Lots of definitions in google so google it
« Last Edit: June 04, 2016, 12:45:33 AM by mercury »