Is this a reasonable objection?

[Mr Gray]

What evidence would that be ?

The evidence that the sceptics do not understand
If they did they would not be sceptic

[jassi]

Same old, same old, You witter on about all the evidence that you have allegedly read, but never produce any for scrutiny.

[Mr Gray]

Same old, same old, You witter on about all the evidence that you have allegedly read, but never produce any for scrutiny.

I posted a whole thread

[jassi]

I posted a whole thread

In that case I'm sure it will be worth repeating - or at least posting a link so that we can all be so well informed.

[Robittybob1]

Thank you for helping the less able out

Any suggestion that any of the tapas opened the shutters is ridiculous based on the evidences

That would depend on the purpose of doing such a thing.  How long would that take to open the window and open the shutter from the inside?  So I can't be too sure about that, but whatever the reason it was opened we can just about rule out:
1. Madeleine falling out that window.
2. That she was abducted via the window.
3. That an intruder climbed in and out that window.
4. That Madeleine opened them herself.

I think we are still on topic "There is no independent verification the window was open before McCann got there".  Is this an unreasonable objection?

[G-Unit]

I thought you even suggested it was a possibility.
you said "Kate's report of their interaction with the GNR in 'Madeleine';
I reported my fears that all three children could have been sedated.
Did the GNR officers totally ignore this? Did Silvia, a mother herself, totally ignore it?"
Or were you quoting Kate entirely?
In which case Kate suggests it rather than you.

To ignore someone's request is to do it deliberately.

The GNR Officers didn't report that Kate was worried abut sedation. I can't think why the GNR Officers would ignore it if they were told. The twins were in danger, would a policeman ignore that?

I can't think of any reason why Silvia would not translate it if Kate said it, but Silvia didn't report it either. As a mother herself would she have really ignored the danger the twins could have been in?

I can't think why a mother and a doctor would trust to luck that her twins would recover if she suspected they'd been doped with an unknown substance.

If Kate was concerned I can't think why she wouldn't ask for medical help.

[Robittybob1]

The GNR Officers didn't report that Kate was worried abut sedation. I can't think why the GNR Officers would ignore it if they were told. The twins were in danger, would a policeman ignore that?

I can't think of any reason why Silvia would not translate it if Kate said it, but Silvia didn't report it either. As a mother herself would she have really ignored the danger the twins could have been in?

I can't think why a mother and a doctor would trust to luck that her twins would recover if she suspected they'd been doped with an unknown substance.

If Kate was concerned I can't think why she wouldn't ask for medical help.

The observation that "The GNR Officers didn't report that Kate was worried about sedation" can be solved by Silvia not mentioning it to them.  Did she at any time in her statement question whether the twins had been drugged?

She doesn't even make this observation as part of her general statement.  "At a certain time, after the arrival of the PJ elements, the parents removed the twins from the beds in which they were still sleeping and took them to the first floor flat."
It is a bit unusual that the thought that the twins were sedated is not mentioned.