Kate McCann: I believe kidnapper drugged my twins night Madeleine was taken.

[Robittybob1]

Ah right. Then she should have done it somewhat earlier when the tests might have meaningful

It only makes sense for the McCanns to test when they have been made arguidos.  The PJ should have done tests at the start.
They shouldn't have to prove their innocence.

[Robittybob1]

There doesn't seem to be a translation of this page in the PJ files www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/CR2/cr2_45.jpg
And it is talking about drug testing the kids I think.  Misty has translated part of it http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=7852.msg375239#msg375239

"At that moment did Gerald McCann refer to the possibility of the children having been sedated, even suggesting that toxicological tests be performed on Madeleine's twin brothers?"

I'll see if i can get the whole page translated.

[stephen25000]

Kate says the McCanns tested the twins for the drugs they had with them.

The tests I was referring to were the possible tests the PJ could have done.  To test for everything they would have had to shave the kids heads to get enough hair.

'Kate says the Mccanns tested the twins for the drugs they had with them' ?

Perhaps you can cite that statement.

[Robittybob1]

'Kate says the Mccanns tested the twins for the drugs they had with them' ?

Perhaps you can cite that statement.

Haven't you bought her book and read it?   It took a while but is documented on page 337 of the revised version (15 pages into the chapter on "The fightback begins"  "And on the 24 September, a forensic scientist from Controlled Risks came to take samples of hair from Sean, Amelie and myself."

Read page in Google Books https://books.google.co.nz/books?id=Gl1YDgqho6kC&pg=PA273&lpg=PA273&dq=a+forensic+scientist+from+Controlled+Risks+came+to+take+samples+of+hair+from+Sean&source=bl&ots=1vHsfItmre&sig=HuQxy-vMyCvBBvNONtU3Z8vL8R0&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiZt5brkMHRAhVLppQKHX3qDR4Q6AEIGTAA

[stephen25000]

Haven't you bought her book and read it?   It took a while but is documented on page 337 of the revised version (15 pages into the chapter on "The fightback begins"  "And on the 24 September, a forensic scientist from Controlled Risks came to take samples of hair from Sean, Amelie and myself."

Read page in Google Books https://books.google.co.nz/books?id=Gl1YDgqho6kC&pg=PA273&lpg=PA273&dq=a+forensic+scientist+from+Controlled+Risks+came+to+take+samples+of+hair+from+Sean&source=bl&ots=1vHsfItmre&sig=HuQxy-vMyCvBBvNONtU3Z8vL8R0&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiZt5brkMHRAhVLppQKHX3qDR4Q6AEIGTAA

I'm sorry to disappoint Rob, but i don't take the book really seriously, as it was written well after the events, and there is no independent record of that at the time of what she said, and what you stated requires that, and not Kate Mccann's hearsay.

By the way Rob, can you provide the cite from the book, including the page and sentence number, where she states what you claim ?

[G-Unit]

It only makes sense for the McCanns to test when they have been made arguidos.  The PJ should have done tests at the start.
They shouldn't have to prove their innocence.

I wish people would stop saying that. Why would they?

[jassi]

It only makes sense for the McCanns to test when they have been made arguidos.  The PJ should have done tests at the start.
They shouldn't have to prove their innocence.

Based on the test result, they certainly didn't prove anything.

[Robittybob1]

I'm sorry to disappoint Rob, but i don't take the book really seriously, as it was written well after the events, and there is no independent record of that at the time of what she said, and what you stated requires that, and not Kate Mccann's hearsay.

By the way Rob, can you provide the cite from the book, including the page and sentence number, where she states what you claim ?

I gave you the page number.   page 337 of the revised and updated  version   I'm not going to count the sentences. 

[stephen25000]

I gave you the page number.   page 337 of the revised version   I'm not going to count the sentences.

Revised version ?

Now that says it all.

So, no proof at all it ever happened, IS THERE ?

Can you provide an extract ?

If you seriously think I would buy the 'revised edition',have another think.

[Robittybob1]

Revised version ?

Now that says it all.

So, no proof at all it ever happened, IS THERE ?

Can you provide an extract ?

If you seriously think I would but the 'revised edition',have another think.

I gave you the page number.   page 337, 338 of the revised and updated  version.  It starts off "And on the 24 September, a forensic scientist from Controlled Risks came to take samples of hair from Sean, Amelie and myself."  google it and then Google a bit more. 

[stephen25000]

I gave you the page number.   page 337, 338 of the revised and updated  version.  It starts off "And on the 24 September, a forensic scientist from Controlled Risks came to take samples of hair from Sean, Amelie and myself."  google it and then Google a bit more.

That was way after the event, and TOTALLY IRRELEVANT.

You know that don't you.

[Robittybob1]

That was way after the event, and TOTALLY IRRELEVANT.

You know that don't you.

It is the best anyone could do at the time.

[stephen25000]

It is the best anyone could do at the time.

Utter rubbish.

The tests should have been done at the start, and by an independent forensic team.

[Robittybob1]

Utter rubbish.

The tests should have been done at the start, and by an independent forensic team.

And who was going to butt in on the Portuguese investigation?

[stephen25000]

And who was going to butt in on the Portuguese investigation?

It was 'butt in'.

...and NOTHING, prevented the Mccanns having their surviving children tested whilst still in Portugal.