Author Topic: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.  (Read 269953 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Alfie

  • Guest
Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #120 on: January 31, 2017, 09:41:25 PM »
Justice has prevailed. The original judgement that Amaral breached Judicial Secrecy and failed to uphold the presumption of innocence has been rejected by both higher courts. The attempt by the McCanns to stop any theory except their own being heard has failed.
That's your take on it.  My take on it is that the McCanns have failed in their concerted and hard fought battle to put an end to the promulgating of lies about them in Amaral's book and to get justice for themselves and for Madeleine.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #121 on: January 31, 2017, 09:42:53 PM »
exactly  they wasted   10 years of the twins lives  in court  and for  what??

Well they have wasted money on pupswing Amaral, which could gave been spent 'searching' for their daughter.

Their arrogance and quest for revenge was their undoing.

Offline carlymichelle

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #122 on: January 31, 2017, 09:43:56 PM »
Well they have wasted money on pupswing Amaral, which could gave been spent 'searching' for their daughter.

Their arrogance and quest for revenge was their undoing.

exactly  and trying to blame anyone but themselves

Alfie

  • Guest
Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #123 on: January 31, 2017, 09:44:00 PM »
Furthermore, Amaral is now a very rich and famous man, thanks to his ruthless exploitation of a missing child and her family.  No doubt he will seek to enrich himself further off Madeleine's disapearance by writing more books and making further chat show appearances. 

Offline jassi

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #124 on: January 31, 2017, 09:44:36 PM »
That's your take on it.  My take on it is that the McCanns have failed in their concerted and hard fought battle to put an end to the promulgating of lies about them in Amaral's book and to get justice for themselves and for Madeleine.

Another of these alternative facts. Almost worthy of Mitchell himself. I am impressed.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline carlymichelle

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #125 on: January 31, 2017, 09:44:56 PM »
Furthermore, Amaral is now a very rich and famous man, thanks to his ruthless exploitation of a missing child and her family.  No doubt he will seek to enrich himself further off Madeleine's disapearance by writing further books and making further chat show appearances.

good for  him if he  does

Alfie

  • Guest
Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #126 on: January 31, 2017, 09:46:07 PM »
Another of these alternative facts. Almost worthy of Mitchell himself. I am impressed.
It's a different viewpoint, we all have them and we are all entitled to voice them (provided they don't libel anybody - after all we're not in Portgual are we?!)

Offline Miss Taken Identity

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #127 on: January 31, 2017, 09:50:48 PM »
That's your take on it.  My take on it is that the McCanns have failed in their concerted and hard fought battle to put an end to the promulgating of lies about them in Amaral's book and to get justice for themselves and for Madeleine.

The Mccanns made him more famous than he was by doing what they did- not everyone who had access to his book believed the theory he mentions they probably had a few other different theories...

What justice would you be talking about from Maddies point of view? is she alive ?can she be found ?did her parents do EVERYTHING to pervent her disappearance from public view? did they hinder a police investigation?
'Never underestimate the power of stupid people'... George Carlin

Offline G-Unit

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #128 on: January 31, 2017, 09:58:19 PM »
Yes I agree. He would gain nothing, he has been vindicated through the courts, he has proved to be the David here, and what a sling shot from the go fund me page.

I am not going to gloat about the McCanns losing, I am saddened that they took this route it lost them a lot of initial support. and Maddie's fate remains unresolved and no one talks about her as he parents hog all the news, with her little baby picture of course. [Helps with the sympathy angle).

Good news for Amaral but still sad day.

It's a disaster all round. Amaral has emerged the winner thanks to the public funding his appeal, but has had years of worry and hardship.

The McCanns have depleted the Fund set up to search for their missing daughter by using it to try to bury the conclusions of the Portuguese investigation as at September 2007.

« Last Edit: January 31, 2017, 10:02:01 PM by G-Unit »
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #129 on: January 31, 2017, 10:09:51 PM »
 
 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4176546/Madeleine-McCann-s-parents-lose-appeal.html
A source close to the family said: 'It’s not good news. We just don’t know what to do but we need to sit down with our lawyer and discuss it.

and after a short pause he said................................. "That'll be cash on the barrel head son"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PRhCSWGS5qI
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #130 on: January 31, 2017, 10:13:21 PM »
Furthermore, Amaral is now a very rich and famous man, thanks to his ruthless exploitation of a missing child and her family.  No doubt he will seek to enrich himself further off Madeleine's disapearance by writing more books and making further chat show appearances.

See Jassi's post above this and just below your post.
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline G-Unit

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #131 on: January 31, 2017, 10:15:37 PM »
That's your take on it.  My take on it is that the McCanns have failed in their concerted and hard fought battle to put an end to the promulgating of lies about them in Amaral's book and to get justice for themselves and for Madeleine.

There are facts and there are theories. The McCanns promoted one theory and Amaral promoted another. Either could be right or both could be wrong; no-one knows. Consequently we can't judge who, if anyone, is lying. 
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Alfie

  • Guest
Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #132 on: January 31, 2017, 10:25:23 PM »
There are facts and there are theories. The McCanns promoted one theory and Amaral promoted another. Either could be right or both could be wrong; no-one knows. Consequently we can't judge who, if anyone, is lying.
We can have an opinion on it and I have voiced mine, hope that's still permissable despite the latest ruling?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #133 on: January 31, 2017, 10:27:09 PM »
There are facts and there are theories. The McCanns promoted one theory and Amaral promoted another. Either could be right or both could be wrong; no-one knows. Consequently we can't judge who, if anyone, is lying.


we know taht some of what amaral wrote is not true....

Blood markers on the wall behind the sofa
Other than her sleep problems, it is possible that Madeleine suffered from an illness, a hypothesis that was never confirmed. Immediately after the discovery of traces of blood in the apartment, the mother, in the course of an interview with a Portuguese magazine, revealed that Madeleine had a nose bleed. But the bleeding could be associated with certain pathologies.




fron ch 4.....no blood was identified on the wall
« Last Edit: January 31, 2017, 10:29:25 PM by davel »

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #134 on: January 31, 2017, 10:31:28 PM »

we know taht some of what amaral wrote is not true....

Blood markers on the wall behind the sofa
Other than her sleep problems, it is possible that Madeleine suffered from an illness, a hypothesis that was never confirmed. Immediately after the discovery of traces of blood in the apartment, the mother, in the course of an interview with a Portuguese magazine, revealed that Madeleine had a nose bleed. But the bleeding could be associated with certain pathologies.




fron ch 4.....no blood was identified on the wall

Nothing you can type, will make a blind bit of difference.

The Mccann's have lost.
« Last Edit: January 31, 2017, 10:45:56 PM by Eleanor »