Author Topic: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.  (Read 299155 times)

0 Members and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #135 on: January 31, 2017, 10:33:06 PM »
Nothing you can type, will make a blind bit of difference.

The Mccann'so have lost.


we are having a discussion and we will continue...nothing anyone types here makes any diference....dont you understand that
« Last Edit: January 31, 2017, 10:46:25 PM by Eleanor »

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #136 on: January 31, 2017, 10:36:22 PM »
we are having a discussion and we will continue...nothing anyone types here makes any diference....dont you understand that

I think you will find the discussions will curtail of it's own accord.

The court circus is over.

They have to pay up.

If they don't, they will be back in court.

The Mccann's have nowhere to go.


Offline Mr Gray

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #137 on: January 31, 2017, 10:37:41 PM »
I think you will find the discussions will curtail of it'so own accord.

The court circus is over.

They have to pay up.

If they don't, they will be back in court.

The Mccann's have nowhere to go.


i think you will find the discussion will continue

Offline carlymichelle

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #138 on: January 31, 2017, 10:37:58 PM »
Nothing you can type, will make a blind bit of difference.

The Mccann'so have lost.


you  almost feel sorry for the mcann supporters dont you?
« Last Edit: January 31, 2017, 10:47:21 PM by Eleanor »

Offline misty

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #139 on: January 31, 2017, 10:40:30 PM »
you  almost feel sorry for the mcann supporters dont you?

We don't need anyone's sympathy, Carly. This decision sends a bad message to those searching for Madeleine & anyone else seeking justice in Portugal.
« Last Edit: January 31, 2017, 10:47:40 PM by Eleanor »

Offline G-Unit

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #140 on: January 31, 2017, 10:43:08 PM »

we know taht some of what amaral wrote is not true....

Blood markers on the wall behind the sofa
Other than her sleep problems, it is possible that Madeleine suffered from an illness, a hypothesis that was never confirmed. Immediately after the discovery of traces of blood in the apartment, the mother, in the course of an interview with a Portuguese magazine, revealed that Madeleine had a nose bleed. But the bleeding could be associated with certain pathologies.




fron ch 4.....no blood was identified on the wall

It no longer matters what Amaral said in his book, though, does it? What matters is the judgement of the Portuguese courts. They have decided that he was exercising his right to freedom of speech and that in doing so he didn't breach the rights of the McCanns or their children. End of.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline carlymichelle

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #141 on: January 31, 2017, 10:46:13 PM »
i think it does matter if their are lies in his book

it doesnt  matter what you  think the court  are in charge not  you

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #142 on: January 31, 2017, 10:47:52 PM »
you  almost feel sorry for the mcann supporters dont you?

there are certainly some on here who need sympathy but I dont think its the Mccann supporters
« Last Edit: January 31, 2017, 10:50:06 PM by Eleanor »

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #143 on: January 31, 2017, 10:50:20 PM »
it doesnt  matter what you  think the court  are in charge not  you

Im glad to say I can still think exactly what I want
« Last Edit: January 31, 2017, 10:52:25 PM by davel »

Offline G-Unit

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #144 on: January 31, 2017, 10:53:27 PM »
We don't need anyone's sympathy, Carly. This decision sends a bad message to those searching for Madeleine & anyone else seeking justice in Portugal.

What 'bad message to those searching for Madeleine'? Who are they and what message have they received? Justice has been achieved; Amaral didn't breach judicial secrecy or the McCann's right to the presumption of innocence, which is what the first court said he was guilty of.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline carlymichelle

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #145 on: January 31, 2017, 10:55:31 PM »
What 'bad message to those searching for Madeleine'? Who are they and what message have they received? Justice has been achieved; Amaral didn't breach judicial secrecy or the McCann's right to the presumption of innocence, which is what the first court said he was guilty of.

exactly  even if the mcanns and supporters dont like it he is entitled to his opinion

Offline misty

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #146 on: January 31, 2017, 11:00:39 PM »
What 'bad message to those searching for Madeleine'? Who are they and what message have they received? Justice has been achieved; Amaral didn't breach judicial secrecy or the McCann's right to the presumption of innocence, which is what the first court said he was guilty of.

The bad message it sends is that if the people responsible for Madeleine's disappearance are caught they are highly unlikely to be successfully prosecuted. The presumption of the McCanns right to innocence has been trashed & will form a suitable part of any defence argument in such circumstances.
I fail to understand why you feel justice has been served.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #147 on: January 31, 2017, 11:05:13 PM »
It's the end of the court case against Amaral. It's the end of the McCann's attempts to silence him. It's the end of any hope they had of adding his earnings to the Fund. Depending on the costs they face, it could be the end of the Fund itself.
« Last Edit: January 31, 2017, 11:46:43 PM by Slartibartfast »
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Eleanor

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #148 on: January 31, 2017, 11:09:03 PM »

This is not going to end well.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #149 on: January 31, 2017, 11:09:42 PM »
I feel sorry for the twins and I think it's an absolute disgrace that there is stil so much unnecessary nastiness towards there parents on the net

We are being lectured that we must accept the rule of law and amaral is entitled to his opinion

Well respect the rule of law as it applies to the McCanns
They have not been found guilty of any offence
Stop treating them as if they are