Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.

[G-Unit]

Do you think the same decision would have been made in other European countries.  I hope they take it further.  It is unjust in my opinion.

I had no idea what the verdict was going to be in Portugal, let alone speculating about other countries. They can't take it further than the Supreme Court, the process is over. My opinion is that it would have been unjust to prevent other theories about the disappearance of Madeleine from being heard.

[carlymichelle]

I had no idea what the verdict was going to be in Portugal, let alone speculating about other countries. They can't take it further than the Supreme Court, the process is over. My opinion is that it would have been unjust to prevent other theories about the disappearance of Madeleine from being heard.

i read  something about how they could take it to the euro court?  that is unlikley right??

[Robittybob1]

I had no idea what the verdict was going to be in Portugal, let alone speculating about other countries. They can't take it further than the Supreme Court, the process is over. My opinion is that it would have been unjust to prevent other theories about the disappearance of Madeleine from being heard.

Was it the provocative nature of the book's title then "The truth of the lie"  Nothing has been proven, I can't see how one side is allowed to proclaim their theory is the truth and the other side is a lie.

i read  something about how they could take it to the euro court?  that is unlikley right??

I hope they do for what they have got at the moment is a terrible judgement.  It will be most interesting to see how the Supreme Court justifies their decision.

[Mr Gray]

I had no idea what the verdict was going to be in Portugal, let alone speculating about other countries. They can't take it further than the Supreme Court, the process is over. My opinion is that it would have been unjust to prevent other theories about the disappearance of Madeleine from being heard.

You obviously haven't listened to amaral
He stated things as facts
What he has done is totally unjust

[stephen25000]

Was it the provocative nature of the book's title then "The truth of the lie"  Nothing has been proven, I can't see how one side is allowed to proclaim their theory is the truth and the other side is a lie.

I hope they do for what they have got at the moment is a terrible judgement.  It will be most interesting to see how the Supreme Court justifies their decision.

That is a matter of opinion, as to it being a 'terrible judgement'.

As far as I am concerned, the law was upheld and justice was done.

After all, Rob, no one forced the McCann's into their action against Amaral. It was a matter of their choice, and the money could have been spent in 'searching for their beloved daughter'.

[Mr Gray]

That is a matter of opinion, as to it being a 'terrible judgement'.

As far as I am concerned, the law was upheld and justice was done.

After all, Rob, no one forced the McCann's into their action against Amaral. It was a matter of their choice, and the money could have been spent in 'searching for their beloved daughter'.

What a nasty post
Referring to poor Maddie sarcastically as their beloved daughter

[stephen25000]

That is a matter of opinion, as to it being a 'terrible judgement'.

As far as I am concerned, the law was upheld and justice was done.

After all, Rob, no one forced the McCann's into their action against Amaral. It was a matter of their choice, and the money could have been spent in 'searching for their beloved daughter'.

What a nasty post
Referring to poor Maddie sarcastically as their beloved daughter

They referred to Madeleine that way themselves.

So let's hear a logical response as to why they didn't use the money they spent in courts, instead, 'searching' for Madeleine.

[Mr Gray]

They referred to Madeleine that way themselves.

So let's hear a logical response as to why they didn't use the money they spent in courts, instead, 'searching' for Madeleine.

They didn't use it sarcastically as you did
Maddie is still missing and you should have more respect and not use her in such a way

[carlymichelle]

What a nasty post
Referring to poor Maddie sarcastically as their beloved daughter





They referred to Madeleine that way themselves.

So let's hear a logical response as to why they didn't use the money they spent in courts, instead, 'searching' for Madeleine.

i hopee posters who   say that GA  is corrupt etc   or the usal stuff are warned now because  2  courts   have  said he is allowed his opinion in this case and  if he  wants to  write books do tv interviews or  whatever he is allowed  too without being bullied online he isnt  responsible for whatever  befell maddie  we know  who is

[Mr Gray]

i hopee posters who   say that GA  is corrupt etc   or the usal stuff are warned now because  2  courts   have  said he is allowed his opinion in this case and  if he  wants to  write books do tv interviews or  whatever he is allowed  too without being bullied online

I can say what I like about amaral within the law
Such as he is a convicted criminal

[Alfie]

Face facts folks - sometimes the bad guys win, as they clearly have done in this case.  Sad, but nothing to be done.  Time to move on for all concerned if possible, IMO.

[Alfie]

I had no idea what the verdict was going to be in Portugal, let alone speculating about other countries. They can't take it further than the Supreme Court, the process is over. My opinion is that it would have been unjust to prevent other theories about the disappearance of Madeleine from being heard.

So if you were in their shoes (which obviously you never would be as you're a perfect parent) you would support any one involved in the investigation into your child's disappearance to write a book pointing the finger at you or your family would you? 

[stephen25000]

They didn't use it sarcastically as you did
Maddie is still missing and you should have more respect and not use her in such a way

Why don't you answer the question instead of diverting ?

[Mr Gray]

Why don't you answer the question instead of diverting ?

Because it's a stupid question which has been discussed at length before

[slartibartfast]

I can say what I like about amaral within the law
Such as he is a convicted criminal

You may want to look at this for guidance...

http://www.inbrief.co.uk/media-law/reporting-on-spent-convictions/