The whole point of her parents bringing the case was to fight for and protect Madeleine's RIGHT to be regarded as a missing child and not to be dismissed and forgotten as a dead one - which is what Amaral was claiming.
The fact that purely out of an intense dislike for the parents, there are those who actually want to take it out on a little girl by supporting the removal of Madeleine's right to be searched for - just for the pleasure of spiting her mum and dad - is both sad and disturbing IMO.
Yes, they said that after they won the first judgement;
“We want to emphasise that the action was never about money. It was entirely focused on the libels on our other children and the damage that was done in the search for Madeleine.”
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/madeleine-mccann-kate-gerry-urge-5599047The strange thing about that statement is that all claims relating to the children failed, so why did they settle for the Eur 500.000 awarded to the two of them?
If the damage caused to their children was their entire focus, why didn't they appeal on their behalf?