Author Topic: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.  (Read 270244 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #570 on: February 03, 2017, 08:23:27 PM »
I would say that after nearly 10 years and not 1 trace of her would be possible evidence of her death.

Then we have the dogs indications.

Uncorroborated, but still there.
yes the dog.....pretty well proof there was a cadaver in the apartment...LOL
Typical sceptic rubbish

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #571 on: February 03, 2017, 08:25:34 PM »
Its quite funny...the McCanns will make far far more by losing the case........it will be great for them to travel the world telling everyone how badly portugal has treated them. they can show what the pj did to Leonora cipriano....

whats amaral up to

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #572 on: February 03, 2017, 08:26:21 PM »
Plenty else does.

But this, above all else, is what makes a mockery of the supreme-court ruling:

From the Book of Many Lies:

Quote
After a week of intense work, Harrison presents the results of his study to my coordinating group. Even if we were expecting it, his conclusions confirm our worst fears. The most plausible scenario is the following: there is no doubt that Madeleine is dead, and her body is hidden somewhere in the area around Praia da Luz. He praises the quality of the work carried out by the Portuguese authorities in trying to find the little girl alive. According to him, the time has come to redirect the searches in order to find, this time, a body hidden in the surrounding area.

More in an edit ....

Penultimate sentence and paragraph of Harrison's final report.


Quote
I am currently of the opinion on the available information and statistical datasets that if death has occurred, that it is possible that Madeleine McCann’s body has been disposed into the sea at Praia da Luz. (See my second report entitled “NPIA OP TASK Search Doc Beach and Marine”).
« Last Edit: February 03, 2017, 08:38:43 PM by ferryman »

Offline carlymichelle

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #573 on: February 03, 2017, 08:26:32 PM »
technicallyif the mcanns are as hard up with money as they say wouldnt the interview money  have to go to paying back amaral /courts??

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #574 on: February 03, 2017, 08:26:39 PM »
Im quite glad to say I told you so...500K will seem like chicken feed compared to what the McCannns can now make...and this is only the beginning....they have moved on

B. Money.

..............and they haven't got a deal yet.

That is all it's ever been about, MONEY.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #575 on: February 03, 2017, 08:28:26 PM »
technicallyif the mcanns are as hard up with money as they say wouldnt the interview money  have to go to paying back amaral /courts??

Yes Carly, it would.

Plus damages.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #576 on: February 03, 2017, 08:28:50 PM »
technicallyif the mcanns are as hard up with money as they say wouldnt the interview money  have to go to paying back amaral /courts??

we dont know how much that is but it will be peanuts compared to what the McCanns will earn.....they may pay it into the fund...may pay it into a trust for the children....

its just so funny

Offline carlymichelle

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #577 on: February 03, 2017, 08:30:01 PM »
Yes Carly, it would.

Plus damages.

exactly.... its only  4 months  away

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #578 on: February 03, 2017, 08:34:43 PM »
If the McCann's do a money deal, they deserve the consequences.

B. MONEY, no doubt about it.

..and Mccann supporters dare criticize Amaral, when the Mccanns have been and will continue to get money over Madeleine's disappearance.
« Last Edit: February 03, 2017, 08:44:43 PM by ShiningInLuz »

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #579 on: February 03, 2017, 08:36:59 PM »
Quote
After a week of intense work, Harrison presents the results of his study to my coordinating group. Even if we were expecting it, his conclusions confirm our worst fears. The most plausible scenario is the following: there is no doubt that Madeleine is dead, and her body is hidden somewhere in the area around Praia da Luz. He praises the quality of the work carried out by the Portuguese authorities in trying to find the little girl alive. According to him, the time has come to redirect the searches in order to find, this time, a body hidden in the surrounding area.

And the penultimate sentence of Mark Harrison's final report:

Quote
I am currently of the opinion on the available information and statistical datasets that if death has occurred, that it is possible that Madeleine McCann’s body has been disposed into the sea at Praia da Luz. (See my second report entitled “NPIA OP TASK Search Doc Beach and Marine”).

How on earth was Amaral allowed to get away with that?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #580 on: February 03, 2017, 08:37:15 PM »
amarals name will be trashed...without libel...they just have to tell the facts.....highlight all the short comings in the investigation,,,amarals conviction...how the portugues courts have allowed him to deny them their Human Rights...
it is just going to be so funny

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #581 on: February 03, 2017, 08:39:49 PM »
And the penultimate sentence of Mark Harrison's final report:

How on earth was Amaral allowed to get away with that?

the McCanns have had to keep quiet whilst the trial was on...and the portuguese were stil "investigating"
the gloves are now off and the sceptics are not going to like it...not a bit

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #582 on: February 03, 2017, 08:40:33 PM »
amarals name will be trashed...without libel...they just have to tell the facts.....highlight all the short comings in the investigation,,,amarals conviction...how the portugues courts have allowed him to deny them their Human Rights...
it is just going to be so funny

It is the McCann's whose reputation is in tatters.

All about MONEY, MONEY, MONEY.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #583 on: February 03, 2017, 08:42:19 PM »
the McCanns have had to keep quiet whilst the trial was on...and the portuguese were stil "investigating"
the gloves are now off and the sceptics are not going to like it...not a bit

B. Money.

So can Amaral, and I look forward to the second book, and worldwide distribution, courtesy of the internet, and not a damn thing the Mccann's can do to stop it.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #584 on: February 03, 2017, 08:45:15 PM »
B. Money.

So can Amaral, and I look forward to the second book, and worldwide distribution, courtesy of the internet, and not a damn thing the Mccann's can do to stop it.

worldwide book courtesy of the internet..like no royalties.....the McCanns will now be giving their side of the story and amaral willl not like it one bit