Author Topic: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.  (Read 270014 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline barrier

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #615 on: February 03, 2017, 10:26:52 PM »
perhaps the mccanns have been told

Then again perhaps they have not.Theres nothing any where to indicate what OG are up to and rightly so.
Just as we have tittle tattle on the 10th anniversary bidding war,its the same with OG.

This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #616 on: February 03, 2017, 10:27:31 PM »
Then again perhaps they have not.Theres nothing any where to indicate what OG are up to and rightly so.


I hope OG are still investigating

Offline faithlilly

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #617 on: February 03, 2017, 10:28:11 PM »
Do you really think that bragging about a bidding war for 10th Anniversary interviews is admirable behaviour? They have frittered away the money donated to them on dodgy detectives and doomed libel trials, but never mind, there's plenty more where that came from?

My prediction is that Kate McCann will speak to Lorraine Kelly. After all, she doesn't ask searching questions, even if ITV don't pay much. To get a big payout she would probably have to face someone who would want more answers.

When was the last time we heard from Gerry  &%+((£
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #618 on: February 03, 2017, 10:29:07 PM »
When was the last time we heard from Gerry  &%+((£

when was the last time we heard from amaral

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #619 on: February 03, 2017, 10:33:09 PM »
No that wasn't the quote you used.

I didn't (first time) use a quote.

I stated a fact with the quote provided when challenged on the fact.

Alfie

  • Guest
Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #620 on: February 03, 2017, 10:33:25 PM »
When was the last time we heard from Gerry  &%+((£
you're always fretting about Gerry, that you haven't heard from him.  Don't worry, he's fine. 8((()*/

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #621 on: February 03, 2017, 10:33:38 PM »
it might refer to a pal.....but its quite obvious that this would happen......and thats why it doesnt surprise me....I am a little surprised it has happened so soon.

the portugues police have washed their hands of the whole thing...the mccanns can now tell the world how badly they have been treated by the PJ ....the portuguese press and the portuguese justice system.
I for one cannot wait

And who will believe it?
They have been plugging that line for ten years with no visible effect on Portugal's standing in the world.
You my son are becoming what was known in military terminolgy as target fixation. It usually results in crash and burn by the target or having your ass flamed by something behind you you did not see..... 8(>((
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #622 on: February 03, 2017, 10:35:29 PM »
And who will believe it?
They have been plugging that line for ten years with no visible effect on Portugal's standing in the world.
You my son are becoming what was known in military terminolgy as target fixation. It usually results in crash and burn by the target or having your ass flamed by something behind you you did not see..... 8(>((

now you are getting desperate.....how interesting ...you will get at least two smileys for that post

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #623 on: February 03, 2017, 10:36:29 PM »
you're always fretting about Gerry, that you haven't heard from him.  Don't worry, he's fine. 8((()*/

That's what worries her, that he's fine ...

Offline slartibartfast

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #624 on: February 03, 2017, 10:38:11 PM »
I didn't (first time) use a quote.

I stated a fact with the quote provided when challenged on the fact.

I wonder what...

Quote
I am currently of the opinion on the available information and statistical datasets that if death has occurred, that it is possible that Madeleine McCann’s body has been disposed into the sea at Praia da Luz. (See my second report entitled “NPIA OP TASK Search Doc Beach and Marine”).

... was that you posted earlier?
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Offline ShiningInLuz

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #625 on: February 03, 2017, 10:39:31 PM »
I tried it politely.

I am not interested in polite any more.

THE TRADITIONAL FRIDAY NIGHT SHIN DIG IS NOT GOING TO HAPPEN.
What's up, old man?

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #626 on: February 03, 2017, 10:39:59 PM »
I wonder what...

... was that you posted earlier?

A quote from one of Harrison's reports.

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #627 on: February 03, 2017, 10:41:21 PM »
now you are getting desperate.....how interesting ...you will get at least two smileys for that post

You do say the funniest things at times.
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline slartibartfast

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #628 on: February 03, 2017, 10:41:47 PM »
A quote from one of Harrison's reports.

Which you quoted...?
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #629 on: February 03, 2017, 10:43:03 PM »
You do say the funniest things at times.

I think alot of posters who were feeling so good last night are realising how much things can change in a day