Author Topic: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.  (Read 299585 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #675 on: February 04, 2017, 10:08:53 AM »
You have said why you do, but it doesn't mean I believe you.

Is it for truth , justice the Mccann way ?  *&*%£

do you in your wildest imagination think I care what you believe or not...get real stephen...LOL

Offline G-Unit

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #676 on: February 04, 2017, 10:21:16 AM »
Does it matter what the McCanns, their friends and supporters and the media have to say or have said in the past about Amaral? In the context of this thread it matters not at all. What matters is what the Appeal Court said and the fact that the Supreme Court ratified their judgement.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #677 on: February 04, 2017, 10:22:31 AM »
Does it matter what the McCanns, their friends and supporters and the media have to say or have said in the past about Amaral? In the context of this thread it matters not at all. What matters is what the Appeal Court said and the fact that the Supreme Court ratified their judgement.

it matters a lot as you will see...although I understand why you want to think it doesnt

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #678 on: February 04, 2017, 10:23:05 AM »
do you in your wildest imagination think I care what you believe or not...get real stephen...LOL

Well for the umpteenth time, don't reply to my posts.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #679 on: February 04, 2017, 10:24:23 AM »
Does it matter what the McCanns, their friends and supporters and the media have to say or have said in the past about Amaral? In the context of this thread it matters not at all. What matters is what the Appeal Court said and the fact that the Supreme Court ratified their judgement.

Exactly.

However, they can't get over it.

They never will. It sticks in their craw.
« Last Edit: February 04, 2017, 10:33:48 AM by stephen25000 »

Online Eleanor

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #680 on: February 04, 2017, 10:38:23 AM »
I support the McCanns but you don't have a clue why
You think you do but you dont

No Sceptics have any real idea of why we do this.  It is actually quite simple for me, and I can no longer be bothered to explain.

Online Eleanor

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #681 on: February 04, 2017, 10:39:45 AM »
You have said why you do, but it doesn't mean I believe you.

Is it for truth , justice the Mccann way ?  *&*%£

Justice is Innocent Until Proven Guilty.  It is really that simple.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #682 on: February 04, 2017, 10:41:42 AM »
it matters a lot as you will see...although I understand why you want to think it doesnt

The decisions made by the Portuguese courts will stand. The costs of the McCann's action plus 50% will be paid by them. Amaral's assets will be returned to him, probably with interest paid by the McCanns. Anyone wishing to write a book about the case in Portugal can be confident that they are unlikely to be sued whatever theory they propose.

If they are as intelligent as some believe they are the McCanns will have learned that believing you're right isn't sufficient in a court case, where you have to provide proof. Isobel Duarte will have learned that when an Appeal is judged on points of law and not on 'the facts' it's because the judgement they are examining was also made using points of law and not 'the facts'.
« Last Edit: February 04, 2017, 11:45:43 AM by Brietta »
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Online Eleanor

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #683 on: February 04, 2017, 10:50:42 AM »
Does it matter what the McCanns, their friends and supporters and the media have to say or have said in the past about Amaral? In the context of this thread it matters not at all. What matters is what the Appeal Court said and the fact that the Supreme Court ratified their judgement.

Right On.  Now wait for the kick back.  Everyone is entitled to an opinion, according to Portuguese Law.  This includes The McCanns.  So Amaral can hardly blame them if they use this Judgement to defend themselves.

Offline faithlilly

Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #685 on: February 04, 2017, 10:55:41 AM »
Right On.  Now wait for the kick back.  Everyone is entitled to an opinion, according to Portuguese Law.  This includes The McCanns.  So Amaral can hardly blame them if they use this Judgement to defend themselves.

The McCanns have held the field for years.

There is nothing they can say, which is anything new, other than their mantra.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #686 on: February 04, 2017, 11:06:07 AM »
Right On.  Now wait for the kick back.  Everyone is entitled to an opinion, according to Portuguese Law.  This includes The McCanns.  So Amaral can hardly blame them if they use this Judgement to defend themselves.

I don't know the man, but if it was me they could say what they liked. He has been vindicated by the Judiciary of his country in which he never lost faith. It will certainly be interesting to watch if they try to turn this judgement round so it favours them.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline jassi

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #687 on: February 04, 2017, 11:08:33 AM »
They have a spin master par excellence to assist, so they'll probably give it a go
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #688 on: February 04, 2017, 11:11:40 AM »
Well for the umpteenth time, don't reply to my posts.

You addressed the post to me thats why I replied

This a free forum i can reply to any post I wish and I will continue to reply to your posts and any other posts I wish

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #689 on: February 04, 2017, 11:12:48 AM »
No Sceptics have any real idea of why we do this.  It is actually quite simple for me, and I can no longer be bothered to explain.

If we do explain stephen has told he wont believe it...so there is no point in expalining