« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 48 49 [50] 51 52 ... 143   Go Down

Author Topic: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.  (Read 270329 times)

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #735 on: February 04, 2017, 02:52:05 PM »
Quote from: xtina on February 04, 2017, 02:24:54 PM

they are not going to want to .promote ..or discuss ....

.what they have tried to ban for 8 years.............

They have tried to supress lies for the alst 8 years....now they will be free to promote the truth
Logged

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #736 on: February 04, 2017, 02:53:11 PM »

amaral accused them of giving her calpol which caused her to have an accident
« Last Edit: February 04, 2017, 03:10:10 PM by ShiningInLuz »
Logged

Offline jassi

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #737 on: February 04, 2017, 02:54:05 PM »
Quote from: davel on February 04, 2017, 02:51:03 PM
then I  dont have to respect this decosion and I dont have to abide by it because it doesnt affect me.....as far as I am concerned it is gone...they have to deal with it and I'm sure they will come back stronger

I don't recall anyone asking you to.
Logged
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #738 on: February 04, 2017, 02:55:10 PM »
Quote from: jassi on February 04, 2017, 02:54:05 PM
I don't recall anyone asking you to.

I still have the freedom of spech to respond to ay post...it seems you dont like that
« Last Edit: February 04, 2017, 03:11:06 PM by ShiningInLuz »
Logged

Offline jassi

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #739 on: February 04, 2017, 03:00:30 PM »
Quote from: davel on February 04, 2017, 02:55:10 PM
I still have the freedom of spech to respond to ay post...it seems you dont like that..

I don't mind what rubbish you feel obliged to write.
« Last Edit: February 04, 2017, 03:12:47 PM by ShiningInLuz »
Logged
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline carlymichelle

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #740 on: February 04, 2017, 03:01:10 PM »
Quote from: jassi on February 04, 2017, 03:00:30 PM
I don't mind what rubbish you feel obliged to write.

either do i  it  doesnt  change that the mcanns lost  does it
Logged

Offline xtina

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #741 on: February 04, 2017, 03:02:41 PM »
Quote from: davel on February 04, 2017, 02:49:01 PM
Doesnt meana nything...I have met several police officers and lawyers who should not be in their jobs and im sure you have too


ye ...and lots of parents ......who shouldn't be parents........
Logged
Always listen to both sides of the story before you judge.

The first storyteller you will always find has modified the story, for there benefit BE WISE.

Offline Eleanor

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #742 on: February 04, 2017, 03:03:32 PM »
Quote from: xtina on February 04, 2017, 02:24:54 PM

they are not going to want to .promote ..or discuss ....

.what they have tried to ban for 8 years.............

Why not?  It is a book of Lies.
Logged

Offline xtina

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #743 on: February 04, 2017, 03:05:56 PM »
Quote from: Eleanor on February 04, 2017, 03:03:32 PM
Why not?  It is a book of Lies.


now you don't know that .do you
Logged
Always listen to both sides of the story before you judge.

The first storyteller you will always find has modified the story, for there benefit BE WISE.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #744 on: February 04, 2017, 03:07:40 PM »
Quote from: xtina on February 04, 2017, 03:02:41 PM

ye ...and lots of parents ......who shouldn't be parents........

#yes I have met lots of parents who shouldnt be parents
Logged

Offline Eleanor

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #745 on: February 04, 2017, 03:10:31 PM »
Quote from: xtina on February 04, 2017, 02:26:45 PM

 @)(++(*....well i do know it is not done by there opinion.........its still a court fgs

Who only have opinions.  Which happen to have differed from The Judge of The First Instance.  But I suspect that I am flogging a dead horse here.
Logged

Offline xtina

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #746 on: February 04, 2017, 03:17:59 PM »
Quote from: Eleanor on February 04, 2017, 03:10:31 PM
Who only have opinions.  Which happen to have differed from The Judge of The First Instance.  But I suspect that I am flogging a dead horse here.


who is the dead horse then .............

i said earlier ..if i believed what i was told ....i would believe in the abduction ....

just because what ........ you say think ........... it doesn't mean its right ........only your opinion
« Last Edit: February 04, 2017, 03:21:41 PM by ShiningInLuz »
Logged
Always listen to both sides of the story before you judge.

The first storyteller you will always find has modified the story, for there benefit BE WISE.

Offline ShiningInLuz

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #747 on: February 04, 2017, 03:22:58 PM »
Please cease on the goading front.

 8((()*/
Logged
What's up, old man?

Offline jassi

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #748 on: February 04, 2017, 03:23:23 PM »
Quote from: Eleanor on February 04, 2017, 03:10:31 PM
Who only have opinions.  Which happen to have differed from The Judge of The First Instance.  But I suspect that I am flogging a dead horse here.

As you are not personally involved that shouldn't really be of much concern.
Logged
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #749 on: February 04, 2017, 03:24:11 PM »
Quote from: davel on February 04, 2017, 10:22:31 AM
it matters a lot as you will see...although I understand why you want to think it doesnt

At the end of the trial we see Sr Amaral is not "toast" as was predicted he would be.
Logged
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey
Pages: 1 ... 48 49 [50] 51 52 ... 143   Go Up
« previous next »