Author Topic: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.  (Read 270380 times)

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #780 on: February 04, 2017, 09:31:57 PM »
the bidding war is being reported in the telegraph now...cant wait to hear what the mcCanns have to say...some are going to be very very upset

It's not the first time such a thing has been reported; denied by all involved last time. It makes you wonder who makes these stories up.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7210340.stm
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #781 on: February 04, 2017, 09:33:45 PM »
And most will not give a flying f**k.

and far  far more will....these bidders will be paying such vast sums because they know what will increase their audiences....your language reveals your anger

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #782 on: February 04, 2017, 09:34:43 PM »
It's not the first time such a thing has been reported; denied by all involved last time. It makes you wonder who makes these stories up.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7210340.stm


things have changed massively...just wait and you will see

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #783 on: February 04, 2017, 09:34:47 PM »
Taking money for the 10 th anniversary of their daughter's disappearance, when the investigation has gone nowhere, and they failed in a major court case, will only result in one inevitable conclusion.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #784 on: February 04, 2017, 09:36:36 PM »
Taking money for the 10 th anniversary of their daughter's disappearance, when the investigation has gone nowhere, and they failed in a major court case, will only result in one inevitable conclusion.


any money taken as yet has gone to the fund...what conclusion would taht be...I dont expect you to be able to articulate an answer

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #785 on: February 04, 2017, 09:42:56 PM »
I think the sceptics here just cannot cope with the fact that the mccanns are going to come back stronger after this set back

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #786 on: February 04, 2017, 09:53:27 PM »

any money taken as yet has gone to the fund...what conclusion would taht be...I dont expect you to be able to articulate an answer

...and the fees from The Oprah Winfrey Show,  the serialisation rights of the book in the Sun, etc.

Where are they ?

Perhaps you can show me where they are given in the company accounts.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #787 on: February 04, 2017, 09:54:20 PM »
I think the sceptics here just cannot cope with the fact that the mccanns are going to come back stronger after this set back

No, all that will be seen is a quest to get more money.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #788 on: February 04, 2017, 09:54:58 PM »
...and the fees from The Oprah Winfrey Show,  the serialisation rights of the book in the Sun, etc.

Where are they ?

Perhaps you can show me where they are given in the company accounts.
 
yes they are all in the accounts

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #789 on: February 04, 2017, 09:55:32 PM »
No, all that will be seen is a quest to get more money.


yes more money for the fund

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #790 on: February 04, 2017, 09:57:20 PM »
 
yes they are all in the accounts

Then provide the link showing that.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #791 on: February 04, 2017, 09:57:51 PM »

yes more money for the fund

The fund has achieved nothing.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #792 on: February 04, 2017, 10:02:51 PM »
The fund has achieved nothing.


that is of no importance

Offline slartibartfast

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #793 on: February 04, 2017, 10:05:40 PM »

things have changed massively...just wait and you will see

Some supporters seem to be living in their own post truth world.
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Offline xtina

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #794 on: February 04, 2017, 10:06:14 PM »
The fund has achieved nothing.


neither has ......the millions and millions already spent...........

the fund only helps the mccs........not maddie...........
Always listen to both sides of the story before you judge.

The first storyteller you will always find has modified the story, for there benefit BE WISE.