Author Topic: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.  (Read 270302 times)

0 Members and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline barrier

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #810 on: February 05, 2017, 12:56:25 PM »
spot on carlymichelle

papers now calling him Victorious detective ..not the bungling cop it seem they are warming to him

I think the readers will want to know more about him ...than the mccs .........

http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/763253/Detective-writing-new-Maddie-McCann-book

The Sun is calling him a Top Cop now.

Quote
   Top cop who accused Madeleine McCann’s parents of covering up her death is planning to write ANOTHER book after winning libel appeal

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/2788143/top-cop-who-accused-madeleine-mccanns-parents-of-covering-up-her-death-is-planning-to-write-another-book-after-winning-libel-appeal/
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #811 on: February 05, 2017, 12:58:21 PM »
The Sun is calling him a Top Cop now.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/2788143/top-cop-who-accused-madeleine-mccanns-parents-of-covering-up-her-death-is-planning-to-write-another-book-after-winning-libel-appeal/


you are misunderstanding the headlines....the headline does not refer to him as a top cop as you claim

typical sceptic mistake

Offline barrier

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #812 on: February 05, 2017, 01:01:53 PM »

you are misunderstanding the headlines....the headline does not refer to him as a top cop as you claim

typical sceptic mistake

I think you may be mistaken as to what the Sun means when they refer to him as Top Cop,its all in print to see.
They no longer refer to him as disgraced cop.
« Last Edit: February 05, 2017, 01:04:49 PM by barrier »
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #813 on: February 05, 2017, 01:04:08 PM »
Good to know that the Portuguese press, also, retains a proper perspective on the nonsense of this ruling, and of where the true injustice lies:

Quote
MIGUEL SOUSA TAVARES

Justice to the Portuguese

Gonçalo Amaral, the inspector of the PJ who was investigating the 'Maddie Case', finished the investigation without any conclusions and decided to write a book to defend the thesis that had not been proven during the investigation: the parents would have murdered their daughter. The book (which, symptomatically, opens with a circumstantial lie) sustains from the beginning the thesis of the brilliant investigator, inspired by the 'Caso Joana Cipriano' - with the enormous difference that here it was not possible to torture the mother to obtain from her a confession Which, shamefully, the court then accepted as evidence. Little did he care: Mr. Amaral turned his professional fiasco, his thesis never demonstrated, in fact official and of that made a business opportunity. Thus accused of killing their daughter, the McCanns brought against Gonçalo Amaral an action of defamation - which they won in the first instance, lost in the Relation and ended up losing definitively in the Supreme. It is freedom of the press, counselors say: the freedom of, without some evidence and lightly accusing someone of having killed their own daughter.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #814 on: February 05, 2017, 01:05:24 PM »
I think you may be mistaken as to what the Sun means when they refer to him as Top Cop,its all in print to see.

you said "a top cop"   you are wrong...the sun says "The top cop" . There is a massive diference...he was the top cop...head of investigation but he was not a top cop

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #815 on: February 05, 2017, 01:07:29 PM »
I think he was a top cop with the most drug busts in Portugal history and criminals fearing him.
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline barrier

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #816 on: February 05, 2017, 01:10:05 PM »
you said "a top cop"   you are wrong...the sun says "The top cop" . There is a massive diference...he was the top cop...head of investigation but he was not a top cop

Top Cop there is no the,you've just made that up to support a failing argument.

Quote
FRESH MISERY FOR MCCANNS Top cop who accused Madeleine McCann’s parents of covering up her death is planning to write ANOTHER book after winning libel appeal
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #817 on: February 05, 2017, 01:13:15 PM »
Top Cop there is no the,you've just made that up to support a failing argument.


quote...

THE TOP cop who accused Madeleine McCann’s parents of covering up her death is planning to write another book about her disappearance after winning a libel appeal.

I have made nothing up its just that you are sloppy in your reading of the article.....

Offline xtina

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #818 on: February 05, 2017, 01:25:11 PM »
you said "a top cop"   you are wrong...the sun says "The top cop" . There is a massive diference...he was the top cop...head of investigation but he was not a top cop


in some peoples eyes he is .............he fought the mccs .and won
Always listen to both sides of the story before you judge.

The first storyteller you will always find has modified the story, for there benefit BE WISE.

Offline barrier

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #819 on: February 05, 2017, 01:26:41 PM »

you are misunderstanding the headlines....the headline does not refer to him as a top cop as you claim

typical sceptic mistake

Headlines.

Quote
FRESH MISERY FOR MCCANNS Top cop who accused Madeleine McCann’s parents of covering up her death is planning to write ANOTHER book after winning libel appeal
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #820 on: February 05, 2017, 01:29:52 PM »

in some peoples eyes he is .............he fought the mccs .and won

it isnt over yet. The Mccanns went down the libel route and lost...there is a lot the general public do not know about amaral...criminal conviction...accusations by his wife of drunk driving with his daughter and lots more
ghe has trashed their reputation...I think his will now be trashed

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #821 on: February 05, 2017, 01:31:28 PM »
I think he was a top cop with the most drug busts in Portugal history and criminals fearing him.

You think, based on what authority?

Offline misty

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #822 on: February 05, 2017, 01:32:29 PM »
Headlines.

He hasn't been a cop for nearly 9 years.

Offline John

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #823 on: February 05, 2017, 01:49:50 PM »
Posters please note new thread, "Victorious Maddie McCann detective writing new book on her disappearance".

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=7928.msg381127#msg381127
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline Brietta

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #824 on: February 05, 2017, 01:54:30 PM »
He was absolutely right.

The UK police should have advised, but not interfered,  and they interfered.

You do remember what the incident was about, do you?

An anonymous email was sent to Prince Charles containing information that a disgruntled former employee of the Ocean Club was involved in Madeleine's abduction.

As was proper procedure His Royal Highness's office forwarded that information to the police.

Who in turn with the protocol of Portugal being the lead investigators forwarded the information to the Portuguese authorities for their information.

It will be noted that the information did not comply with the Portuguese chief investigator's theory and caused him a measure of annoyance.

Quote
In the evening, while driving, I receive an unidentified phone call, the last straw…A journalist asks me if I want to comment on the subject of the email. Whether due to the difficult day, the raging storm or the fact of driving through rain…I lose my cool. I reply, irritably, without thinking, that the message is of no interest and that it would be better for the English police to occupy themselves with the Portuguese investigation.
Goncalo Amaral

So who exactly caused the damage to reputation which apparently led to Amaral being kicked off the case if that is an example of the volatility of the man?

However, Portuguese law is the law in Portugal.  It doesn't stop others stepping back in amazement at its vagaries.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....