Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.

[slartibartfast]

To a certain extent they do
Or they can issue bankruptcy proceedings
What do you think

Enforcement Officers go in before bankruptcy. What the point of making someone bankrupt if they have assets which will cover the debt.

[Mr Gray]

Enforcement Officers go in before bankruptcy. What the point of making someone bankrupt if they have assets which will cover the debt.

A reasonable repayment plan will be accepted by the court
Those owed money cannot send in bailiffs in this case
Their only option is to threaten bankruptcy

[G-Unit]

Makes no difference
Depends how much they are asked for
Depends on how much they have
Depends on whether they choose to use the fund
Depends on whether amaral suing is a reasonable possibility
Depends on how much equity they have in their house
We just have to wait and see

The decision over whether to use the fund or not is not the McCann's. There are four other directors who will need to be sure that using the fund is acceptable.

[stephen25000]

The decision over whether to use the fund or not is not the McCann's. There are four other directors who will need to be sure that using the fund is acceptable.

Exactly G-Unit.

it does not belong solely in the Mccann's hands.

[faithlilly]

SC judgement in Portuguese if anyone wants to start translating.

https://pjga.blogspot.co.uk/2017/02/apelacao_7.html

[Alice Purjorick]

perhaps you need to...in the case of a bankruptcy order you can tell the bailliffs to foxtrot oscar

Show me where I mentioned bailiffs.

[Alice Purjorick]

No different from any other debt
I've chased people for money for 40 yrs so I know all about it

I met a particular German once when doing what I do. After a while it became appparent he was the only U-Boat Commander who flew a Focke Wulf 190 whilst sitting in a Tiger Tank.
Nuff said.

[Alice Purjorick]

You appear to be under the misapprehension that those owed money have to agree to whatever payment plan is offered by the debtor.

Forget at your peril the "Licensed Mugger".

[Mr Gray]

Show me where I mentioned bailiffs.

You didn't
I did

[Alice Purjorick]

You didn't
I did

Bailiffs were not relevant to my argument so why did you mention them?

[Mr Gray]

Bailiffs were not relevant to my argument so why did you mention them?

They were

[barrier]

SC judgement in Portuguese if anyone wants to start translating.

https://pjga.blogspot.co.uk/2017/02/apelacao_7.html

I suspect its not going to be easy reading for some,can see it now,the supreme court judges misunderstand the dog alerts.

[Brietta]

I suspect its not going to be easy reading for some,can see it now,the supreme court judges misunderstand the dog alerts.

Why do you think there will be any mention of dog alerts?

[Mr Gray]

I suspect its not going to be easy reading for some,can see it now,the supreme court judges misunderstand the dog alerts.

If the Supreme Court are saying that Eddie and keela detected the scent of human blood and human cadaver then they certainly do not understand the alerts

[Mr Gray]

Why do you think there will be any mention of dog alerts?

Part of the proven facts
It is there