Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.

[Brietta]

wouldn't you think the mccs have enough on there plate as it is .........

with the court judgment ...without getting involved in this ........



http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/madeleine-mccanns-parents-blast-appalling-9777961




Madeleine McCann's parents blast "appalling" and "insensitive" BBC drama about fake kidnap

Wrong thread xtina.  Please find an appropriate thread to post it or start one.

[G-Unit]

In countries where the rule of law is respected, there is never a requirement on those accused to 'prove' their innocence; rather, on their accusers to prove their guilt.

The whole "case" against Kate and Gerry pretty much rests on the incompetent deployment of one dog (in particular).

The same applies in Portugal. The McCanns were not required to prove their innocence. What was publicised was the erroneous belief that releasing someone from arguido status 'proved' them innocent. It didn't.

[Alfie]

The same applies in Portugal. The McCanns were not required to prove their innocence. What was publicised was the erroneous belief that releasing someone from arguido status 'proved' them innocent. It didn't.

In the eyes of the law in Portugal, are the McCanns innocent or not innocent?

[G-Unit]

In the eyes of the law in Portugal, are the McCanns innocent or not innocent?

Firstly who are 'the law'? Secondly have they (whoever they are) ever given an opinion?

[Mr Gray]

Firstly who are 'the law'? Secondly have they (whoever they are) ever given an opinion?

The law is the Supreme Court and they have given an opinion if we accept this translation
They should be entitled to the presumption of innocence

[xtina]

In the eyes of the law in Portugal, are the McCanns innocent or not innocent?

silly question really ....

because the mccs at this moment in time ....... are classed as neither innocent ...or guilty
most thought they were cleared ...but they were not ........

hopefully they will be re interviewed .and this time have to cooperate.....

[Alfie]

Firstly who are 'the law'? Secondly have they (whoever they are) ever given an opinion?

Is the Supreme court not "the law?"  If it's not, then I'd like to know what it is.  And yes it has given an opinion, about 75 pages of it I believe.  So, in the eyes of the law, are the McCanns innocent or not innocent?

[jassi]

Maybe Isabel will know.

[Alfie]

silly question really ....

because the mccs at this moment in time ....... are classed as neither innocent ...or guilty
most thought they were cleared ...but they were not ........

hopefully they will be re interviewed .and this time have to cooperate.....

If in the eyes of the law the McCanns are neither innocent nor guilty then what is their legal position?  A little bit guilty?  A teensy bit innocent?  What?

[Alfie]

It would seem that because the McCanns were once arguidos 9 years ago, that their legal status is now different from, say, mine or Joe Bloggs.  Unlike me or Joe Bloggs, the McCanns  are not allowed to be considered free of any implication of guilt in the disappearance of Madeleine McCann.  So, what is the legal name for this state of purgartory they find themselves in?

[G-Unit]

Is the Supreme court not "the law?"  If it's not, then I'd like to know what it is.  And yes it has given an opinion, about 75 pages of it I believe.  So, in the eyes of the law, are the McCanns innocent or not innocent?

If the Supreme Court gave an opinion about the innocence of the McCann's I haven't seen it as yet. If you have I would be interested to read it.

[Mr Gray]

If the Supreme Court gave an opinion about the innocence of the McCann's I haven't seen it as yet. If you have I would be interested to read it.

They have said
According to this translation
That the cannot be considered innocent

[Alfie]

If the Supreme Court gave an opinion about the innocence of the McCann's I haven't seen it as yet. If you have I would be interested to read it.

According to the judgement the McCanns are not proven innocent.  So what are they then?

[xtina]

If in the eyes of the law the McCanns are neither innocent nor guilty then what is their legal position?  A little bit guilty?  A teensy bit innocent?  What?

I will say on that ....we will have to wait and see the outcome............i do think they have involved themselves ....a lot more than they was...of which i am very pleased about ....

and we know now its...... what some of us  have said for years ....they were not cleared .....of guilt....

[xtina]

According to the judgement the McCanns are not proven innocent.  So what are they then?

maybe back under suspicion ............