Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.

[jassi]

tell that to the rape victim being stoned to death!

You do that, your the one that seems concerned.

[G-Unit]

But we do have the right to debate their verdict and even consider the possibility that it is an unjust verdict.

Hopefully by understanding what the judges actually said instead of what people think they said.

[Erngath]

tell that to the rape victim being stoned to death!

I really was lost for words.

[jassi]

So, the post about our oldest ally ..................are you sure?

1373  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglo-Portuguese_Alliance

[Erngath]

Hopefully by understanding what the judges actually said instead of what people think they said.

Well we will have to wait for accredited translations in order to do that.

[Alfie]

You do that, your the one that seems concerned.

thanks for your permission to continue to voice my concerns.

[Erngath]

1373  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglo-Portuguese_Alliance

The Auld Alliance was 1295,
95 years before the Anglo-Portuguese alliance.

[jassi]

The Auld Alliance was 1295,
95 years before the Anglo-Potuguese alliance.

But not still in place.  Added to which Scotland and England have been at war several times before the Act of  Union

Portugal must be one of the few countries we have never been to war with

[faithlilly]

No we haven't forgotten, but currently we're engaged in a discussion about the Supreme Court ruling which has decided that the McCanns' can't be considered innocent because years ago they were made arguidos and the case shelved for lack of evidence.  I for one am trying to understand what their current status is, if they haven't been cleared, they can't be considered innocent, but they haven't been arguidos for 9 years.  They seem to be in some sort of legal purgatory which has yet to be given a proper definition in law.

You haven't forgotten? That's not the impression I'm getting. Not one word about the ruling having a detrimental effect on the search for the child, just the ongoing search for her parent's good name.

[Erngath]

You do that, your the one that seems concerned.

And you are not?

[G-Unit]

Well we will have to wait for accredited translations in order to do that.

Accredited by whom?

[Erngath]

But not still in place.  Added to which Scotland and England have been at war several times before the Act of  Union

Portugal must be one of the few countries we have never been to war with

There's very few countries that England hasn't been at war with, that is true.

[jassi]

Accredited by whom?

Good question. I doubt there will be a formally accredited version. Who would want to pay for one.

[Erngath]

Accredited by whom?

P
Who has done the translations that we are reading on the internet  and have these translations been verified as being correct.

[Alfie]

You haven't forgotten? That's not the impression I'm getting. Not one word about the ruling having a detrimental effect on the search for the child, just the ongoing search for her parent's good name.

Do you know something?  I'm really not interested in the impression you're getting.  We've discussed the issue of the detrimental effect we believe the book had on the search for Madeleine at length before.  We are currently discussing the disregard for the presumption of innocence as demonstrated by the Supreme Court.  You seem to have a problem with this, one can't imagine why.