Author Topic: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.  (Read 298939 times)

0 Members and 15 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline carlymichelle

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1320 on: February 09, 2017, 07:26:49 AM »
If the McCanns were ever arrested and tried they would benefit from the presumption of innocence just like any other person put on trial.

The defendants in the Stephen Lawrence case never lost that right before the law. Even so, on 14 February 1997, the Daily Mail newspaper labelled all five suspects "murderers". The headline read, "Murderers: The Mail accuses these men of killing. If we are wrong, let them sue us."

I expect the McCanns would sue if a newspaper printed something like that about them, but they can't sue them for saying the McCanns weren't cleared by the archiving dispatch because they weren't. Just like the McCanns, those newspapers who reported them cleared by the archiving dispatch got it wrong.

right so the portugese  consider the mcanns still suspects


Offline G-Unit

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1322 on: February 09, 2017, 07:32:27 AM »


Did they really say death?????????????????


Fresh anguish for Madeleine McCann's parents as Portugal's supreme court insists they haven't been proved innocent over their daughter's death


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4206214/Court-says-Madeleine-McCann-s-parents-HAVEN-T-cleared.html#ixzz4YAezkxpW
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline carlymichelle

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1323 on: February 09, 2017, 07:33:22 AM »

Did they really say death?????????????????


Fresh anguish for Madeleine McCann's parents as Portugal's supreme court insists they haven't been proved innocent over their daughter's death


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4206214/Court-says-Madeleine-McCann-s-parents-HAVEN-T-cleared.html#ixzz4YAezkxpW
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

they did???  wow i cant believe it

Offline carlymichelle

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1324 on: February 09, 2017, 07:41:37 AM »
 %£&)**# i never  thought it  see the day that the daily mail  said   death and blame dthe mcanns!!!

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1325 on: February 09, 2017, 08:00:07 AM »
right so the portugese  consider the mcanns still suspects
Suspects as much as anyone else, but not arguidos.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1326 on: February 09, 2017, 08:07:03 AM »
%£&)**# i never  thought it  see the day that the daily mail  said   death and blame dthe mcanns!!!
No one is blaming the McCanns.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1327 on: February 09, 2017, 08:10:40 AM »
No one is blaming the McCanns.

................for what is no one blaming the McCann's ?

Offline carlymichelle

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1328 on: February 09, 2017, 08:12:00 AM »
................for what is no one blaming the McCann's ?

i was  just reporting on what the daily mail said they said the mcanns  were  NOT cleard by portugese  of their  daughters death!!!!!!! im still shocked  ?{)(**

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1329 on: February 09, 2017, 08:14:46 AM »
................for what is no one blaming the McCann's ?
Don't know sorry ask Carli  " i never  thought it  see the day that the daily mail  said   death and blame the mccanns!!!"

i was  just reporting on what the daily mail said they said the mcanns  were  NOT cleard by portugese  of their  daughters death!!!!!!! im still shocked  ?{)(**
But they also state that no one knows what happened to Madeleine.  Seems contradictory so far.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline slartibartfast

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1330 on: February 09, 2017, 08:17:05 AM »
Don't know sorry ask Carli  " i never  thought it  see the day that the daily mail  said   death and blame the mccanns!!!"
But they also state that no one knows what happened to Madeleine.  Seems contradictory so far.

Please see other thread.
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Offline xtina

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1331 on: February 09, 2017, 08:35:38 AM »
At the moment I've not bothered to progress beyond page two.  Life is far too short to be wasted on misinformed tittle tattle.  No doubt I may continue reading once the paint on the wall has dried properly ... watching that was far more interesting than reading medieval ramblings with no place at all in the nineteenth century let alone the twenty first.

Do forgive me, on that basis I have not bothered to read your post either ... it is really all a monumental irrelevance to furthering Madeleine McCann's case ... and quite frankly I'm bored with the renewed mendacity directed at her parents despite the fact Amaral has won his right to freedom of speech.

The book had no basis in fact ... Amaral has won his right to free speech ... the McCanns have had their right not to suffer character assassination and defamation removed.

The maxim that with rights comes responsibility seems to have been overlooked somewhat.


no problem.......i don't read all yours either ...usually far too long...

At the moment I've not bothered to progress beyond page two.  Life is far too short to be wasted on misinformed tittle tattle.


Oh lol...........yet you spend half your life on here ....and how is it tittle tattle

as you see now .........the UK news papers are reporting .....

i always thought ........once they get there teeth into something ..that won't bite them back ...

they will be down on the mccs like a avalanche


Always listen to both sides of the story before you judge.

The first storyteller you will always find has modified the story, for there benefit BE WISE.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1332 on: February 09, 2017, 08:38:13 AM »

no problem.......i don't read all yours either ...usually far too long...

At the moment I've not bothered to progress beyond page two.  Life is far too short to be wasted on misinformed tittle tattle.


Oh lol...........yet you spend half your life on here ....and how is it tittle tattle

as you see now .........the UK news papers are reporting .....

i always thought ........once they get there teeth into something ..that won't bite them back ...

they will be down on the mccs like a avalanche
No they won't.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1333 on: February 09, 2017, 08:42:41 AM »
No they won't.

Are you paying attention to events Rob ?

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1334 on: February 09, 2017, 08:47:47 AM »
Are you paying attention to events Rob ?
well as much as I can.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.