« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 89 90 [91] 92 93 ... 143   Go Down

Author Topic: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.  (Read 299027 times)

0 Members and 9 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline carlymichelle

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1350 on: February 09, 2017, 09:09:35 AM »
Quote from: xtina on February 09, 2017, 09:08:30 AM

well its not going to bite them back........ is it fgs......

they are not doing the mccs any favors ..are they .........

especially will make sure won't be adding to the fund....

the uk press have nothing to lose now  xena  the mcanns  cant afford to sue them anymore can they?
Logged

Offline xtina

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1351 on: February 09, 2017, 09:10:18 AM »
Quote from: carlymichelle on February 09, 2017, 09:02:26 AM
it  appears the uk medias gloves are off

lol......they have been waiting for this a long time ..............

mind you so have i....
Logged
Always listen to both sides of the story before you judge.

The first storyteller you will always find has modified the story, for there benefit BE WISE.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1352 on: February 09, 2017, 09:12:29 AM »
Quote from: stephen25000 on February 09, 2017, 09:09:08 AM
Hardly.

The Mccann's have said for years the archiving report cleared them.

That was a falsehood.
If you are innocent and know it for a fact it clears them, but if they were guilty it just takes them off the hook.
Logged
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline carlymichelle

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1353 on: February 09, 2017, 09:12:44 AM »
Quote from: xtina on February 09, 2017, 09:10:18 AM
lol......they have been waiting for this a long time ..............

mind you so have i....

rob doesnt understand how huge this is  the uk media have been  kissing up to the mccans until now and not anymore...
Logged

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1354 on: February 09, 2017, 09:16:57 AM »
Quote from: Robittybob1 on February 09, 2017, 09:12:29 AM
If you are innocent and know it for a fact it clears them, but if they were guilty it just takes them off the hook.

The guilty party has yet to be determined.

Do you seriously imagine in the whole wide world that potentially guilty people in other cases have not claimed they were innocent ?
Logged

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1355 on: February 09, 2017, 09:18:53 AM »
Quote from: stephen25000 on February 09, 2017, 09:16:57 AM
The guilty party has yet to be determined.

Do you seriously imagine in the whole wide world that potentially guilty people in other cases have not claimed they were innocent ?
And was there no evidence against these potentially guilty people?
Logged
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1356 on: February 09, 2017, 09:19:59 AM »
Quote from: Robittybob1 on February 09, 2017, 09:18:53 AM
And was there no evidence against these potentially guilty people?

Not always Rob.

I really can't believe that you are that naive.
Logged

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1357 on: February 09, 2017, 09:22:04 AM »
Quote from: stephen25000 on February 09, 2017, 09:19:59 AM
Not always Rob.

I really can't believe that you are that naive.
Which case are you thinking of?
Logged
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline xtina

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1358 on: February 09, 2017, 09:30:41 AM »
Quote from: Robittybob1 on February 09, 2017, 09:22:04 AM
Which case are you thinking of?


more to the point .......what case are you

i think you know.............just a bit of disruption going on here

i don't really like answering your posts rob ..you have a habit of going back and changing them ....
Logged
Always listen to both sides of the story before you judge.

The first storyteller you will always find has modified the story, for there benefit BE WISE.

Offline carlymichelle

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1359 on: February 09, 2017, 09:31:50 AM »
Quote from: xtina on February 09, 2017, 09:30:41 AM

more to the point .......what case are you

i think you know.............just a bit of disruption going on here

i don't really like answering your posts rob ..you have a habit of going back and changing them ....

a diversion??
Logged

Offline jassi

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1360 on: February 09, 2017, 09:32:34 AM »
Quote from: carlymichelle on February 09, 2017, 09:31:50 AM
a diversion??


Most certainly. What else is there?
Logged
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1361 on: February 09, 2017, 09:33:31 AM »
Quote from: xtina on February 09, 2017, 09:30:41 AM

more to the point .......what case are you

i think you know.............just a bit of disruption going on here

i don't really like answering your posts rob ..you have a habit of going back and changing them ....
Usually spelling mistakes.  I'm talking about the McCann case.
Logged
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1362 on: February 09, 2017, 09:37:18 AM »
Quote from: stephen25000 on February 09, 2017, 09:16:57 AM
The guilty party has yet to be determined.

Do you seriously imagine in the whole wide world that potentially guilty people in other cases have not claimed they were innocent ?
So you aren't saying the McCanns are the guilty party.  OK  that's fine by me.
Logged
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline xtina

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1363 on: February 09, 2017, 09:39:58 AM »
Quote from: Robittybob1 on February 09, 2017, 09:33:31 AM
Usually spelling mistakes.  I'm talking about the McCann case.

you are not ....you are posting ......

seems you dont like what you are reading .....

i know how you feel i have felt like that for years ...........reading the one sided stuff ..they have been churning out ....

now at last .we have got to the bigger picture .....and the news the mccs are not cleared ..

soooooo what happened to maddie .....

G A book is now on sale at amazon

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Maddie-verdade-mentira-Goncalo-Amaral/dp/9898174129/ref=pd_sbs_14_img_1?_encoding=UTF8&psc=1&refRID=9QEYHE7W63RDK6PW06CM
Logged
Always listen to both sides of the story before you judge.

The first storyteller you will always find has modified the story, for there benefit BE WISE.

Offline jassi

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1364 on: February 09, 2017, 09:43:46 AM »
Quote from: xtina on February 09, 2017, 09:39:58 AM
you are not ....you are posting ......

seems you dont like what you are reading .....

i know how you feel i have felt like that for years ...........reading the one sided stuff ..they have been churning out ....

now at last .we have got to the bigger picture .....and the news the mccs are not cleared ..

soooooo what happened to maddie .....

G A book is now on sale at amazon

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Maddie-verdade-mentira-Goncalo-Amaral/.... ....../9898174129/ref=pd_sbs_14_img_1?_encoding=UTF8&psc=1&refRID=9QEYHE7W63RDK6PW06CM


Understatement  of the week   @)(++(*
Logged
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future
Pages: 1 ... 89 90 [91] 92 93 ... 143   Go Up
« previous next »