Author Topic: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.  (Read 269999 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Miss Taken Identity

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1995 on: February 23, 2017, 11:48:42 AM »
Maybe they started to believe their own PR?

Oh I don't think they needed much convincing of their own PR They became quite savvy very quickly. They got a story- ran with it- caught the hearts of people, by hob nobbing ith the 'good and the great' photos with the pope, PM phone calls all in Gerrys diary... so proud they were...the Oprah Winfrey show  wow !
'Never underestimate the power of stupid people'... George Carlin

Offline Brietta

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1996 on: February 23, 2017, 04:06:25 PM »
Oh I don't think they needed much convincing of their own PR They became quite savvy very quickly. They got a story- ran with it- caught the hearts of people, by hob nobbing ith the 'good and the great' photos with the pope, PM phone calls all in Gerrys diary... so proud they were...the Oprah Winfrey show  wow !

The 'story they ran with' to which you refer was the disappearance without trace of their dearly loved eldest child.

Absolutely shameful that there are those who have denigrated their efforts on her behalf for very close on ten years ... inclusive of the superhuman effort of being responsible for getting initially Scotland Yard to start a proper investigation of Madeleine McCann's case which was closely followed by the Policia Judiciaria.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline slartibartfast

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1997 on: February 23, 2017, 04:11:48 PM »
The 'story they ran with' to which you refer was the disappearance without trace of their dearly loved eldest child.

Absolutely shameful that there are those who have denigrated their efforts on her behalf for very close on ten years ... inclusive of the superhuman effort of being responsible for getting initially Scotland Yard to start a proper investigation of Madeleine McCann's case which was closely followed by the Policia Judiciaria.

I'm pretty sure it wasn't superhuman.
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Offline barrier

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1998 on: February 23, 2017, 04:26:26 PM »
The 'story they ran with' to which you refer was the disappearance without trace of their dearly loved eldest child.

Absolutely shameful that there are those who have denigrated their efforts on her behalf for very close on ten years ... inclusive of the superhuman effort of being responsible for getting initially Scotland Yard to start a proper investigation of Madeleine McCann's case which was closely followed by the Policia Judiciaria.

I suppose eliminating all and sundry is a proper investigation,yet still there is nothing to suggest that there is a resolution coming any time soon.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1999 on: February 23, 2017, 04:48:41 PM »
Oh I don't think they needed much convincing of their own PR They became quite savvy very quickly. They got a story- ran with it- caught the hearts of people, by hob nobbing ith the 'good and the great' photos with the pope, PM phone calls all in Gerrys diary... so proud they were...the Oprah Winfrey show  wow !
You sound jealous!
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #2000 on: February 23, 2017, 04:50:46 PM »
I'm pretty sure it wasn't superhuman.
I prefer Wonder woman.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #2001 on: February 23, 2017, 04:55:54 PM »
I suppose eliminating all and sundry is a proper investigation,yet still there is nothing to suggest that there is a resolution coming any time soon.

Well we are often told that the first step would have been to investigate and eliminate the McCanns. I wonder if they've told the Supreme Court judges? Not that it would make any difference, of course, because the judges were answering Duarte's claim that they were cleared by the archiving dispatch.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #2002 on: February 23, 2017, 04:58:01 PM »
Well we are often told that the first step would have been to investigate and eliminate the McCanns. I wonder if they've told the Supreme Court judges? Not that it would make any difference, of course, because the judges were answering Duarte's claim that they were cleared by the archiving dispatch.
Did Duarte have her client's permission to state that?
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #2003 on: February 23, 2017, 05:03:59 PM »
Did Duarte have her client's permission to state that?

What are you on about?
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Brietta

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #2004 on: February 23, 2017, 05:28:30 PM »
I suppose eliminating all and sundry is a proper investigation,yet still there is nothing to suggest that there is a resolution coming any time soon.

Without the former there would be no possibility of the latter ... and perhaps if that necessary diligence had been carried out at a much earlier date there might have been a higher probability to square the circle.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline barrier

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #2005 on: February 23, 2017, 05:49:04 PM »
Without the former there would be no possibility of the latter ... and perhaps if that necessary diligence had been carried out at a much earlier date there might have been a higher probability to square the circle.

Seriously! 710 eliminated at the last official announcement,they were all in Portugal? all those folks and not one can give (or maybe apart from the Smiths) a clue to what happened.Not forgetting 8,000+ possible world wide sightings when there isn't any thing to suggest Madeleine even left the country.
« Last Edit: February 23, 2017, 05:56:25 PM by barrier »
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Brietta

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #2006 on: February 23, 2017, 06:04:46 PM »
Seriously! 710 eliminated at the last official announcement,they were all in Portugal? all those folks and not one can give (or maybe apart from the Smiths) a clue to what happened.

Madeleine went missing in Portugal ... is it your opinion that no-one in Portugal knows anything about that?
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline jassi

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #2007 on: February 23, 2017, 06:08:11 PM »
I'm sure the Portuguese police know all about it.
It may well be that the perpetrator of the crime( if there was a crime) was not a Portuguese national.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline barrier

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #2008 on: February 23, 2017, 06:21:23 PM »
Madeleine went missing in Portugal ... is it your opinion that no-one in Portugal knows anything about that?

I'm sure the PJ do,they are waiting for SY to catch up.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Brietta

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #2009 on: February 23, 2017, 07:43:02 PM »
I'm sure the PJ do,they are waiting for SY to catch up.

Why on earth would the Policia Judiciaria wait for any foreign force to play catch up or anything else with them other than an exchange of information?

The PJ have primacy.  It is their case.

If they have information ... why would you suppose they would not act on it?
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....