Author Topic: Was stranger abduction unlikely due to the checking regime?  (Read 42942 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Was stranger abduction unlikely due to the checking regime?
« Reply #300 on: March 05, 2017, 08:41:49 PM »
Do you think there was an unbroken stream of individuals passing through the car park keeping continual eyeball contact on the McCann children's window?

The abductor in Cleveland opened windows.  He was picked up by the CCTV camera doing so.

Madeleine's bedroom window was open; no-one in the apartment legitimately opened it.  Just as there is no explanation for the windows in Cleveland to be opened and closed ... there is no explanation why Madeleine's window was found to be open after Madeleine was found to be gone.

Something along the lines of it being noted in retrospect that Madeleine's bedroom door was positioned differently between checks, despite no-one legitimately within the apartment moving it.

Somebody would notice shutters raised and that open window and if locked it had to be opened from the inside so you look for evidence there and evidence was found. Jane passed through that car park at around 9:40 and Russell 5 minutes after. They saw and heard nowt. It wasn't long after that Kate went to the apartment and found the window was open. Must have been a lucky night as they did more checks that night than any other. That abductor must love a challenge  8(>((
« Last Edit: March 05, 2017, 08:45:54 PM by pathfinder73 »
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: Was stranger abduction unlikely due to the checking regime?
« Reply #301 on: March 05, 2017, 09:36:15 PM »
Do you think there was an unbroken stream of individuals passing through the car park keeping continual eyeball contact on the McCann children's window?

The abductor in Cleveland opened windows.  He was picked up by the CCTV camera doing so.

Madeleine's bedroom window was open; no-one in the apartment legitimately opened it.  Just as there is no explanation for the windows in Cleveland to be opened and closed ... there is no explanation why Madeleine's window was found to be open after Madeleine was found to be gone.

Something along the lines of it being noted in retrospect that Madeleine's bedroom door was positioned differently between checks, despite no-one legitimately within the apartment moving it.

I can't find that amongst the  FBI, Cleveland PD and Clevaland media stuff will you post it please ?
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Alfie

  • Guest
Re: Was stranger abduction unlikely due to the checking regime?
« Reply #302 on: March 05, 2017, 09:57:13 PM »
Somebody would notice shutters raised and that open window and if locked it had to be opened from the inside so you look for evidence there and evidence was found. Jane passed through that car park at around 9:40 and Russell 5 minutes after. They saw and heard nowt. It wasn't long after that Kate went to the apartment and found the window was open. Must have been a lucky night as they did more checks that night than any other. That abductor must love a challenge  8(>((
which do you think is more of a challenge - a stranger abducting a child from an unlocked unattended apartment, or a father disposing of a corpse in the middle of a holiday resort at 10pm and inventing an abuduction plot with the co-operation of his wife?

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Was stranger abduction unlikely due to the checking regime?
« Reply #303 on: March 05, 2017, 10:29:55 PM »
which do you think is more of a challenge - a stranger abducting a child from an unlocked unattended apartment, or a father disposing of a corpse in the middle of a holiday resort at 10pm and inventing an abuduction plot with the co-operation of his wife?

I follow evidence and the only credible evidence of an abductor is Smithman. A partner in crime would explain the moving door (Madeleine being asleep in the same position according to her father and the door had moved) so probably more than one is involved for a door to keep moving. So your looking for at least two being involved Alfie. Put your thinking cap on...........
« Last Edit: March 05, 2017, 11:55:40 PM by Brietta »
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Was stranger abduction unlikely due to the checking regime?
« Reply #304 on: March 06, 2017, 12:43:25 AM »
Are they not just as likely to have opened the patio door wider - a much more likely mode of entry than a window ?
Only if they don't have a key.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Was stranger abduction unlikely due to the checking regime?
« Reply #305 on: March 06, 2017, 01:29:30 AM »
Only if they don't have a key.

If a key was used they could have locked the patio door and kept the checkers out and used the same door to exit - it was the safer exit being hidden behind the wall. To waste time, risk leaving evidence and put yourself in more danger by raising noisy shutters and opening a window which anyone could see is a nonsensical theory if you had a KEY.
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline Brietta

Re: Was stranger abduction unlikely due to the checking regime?
« Reply #306 on: March 06, 2017, 02:04:17 AM »
If a key was used they could have locked the patio door and kept the checkers out and used the same door to exit - it was the safer exit being hidden behind the wall. To waste time, risk leaving evidence and put yourself in more danger by raising noisy shutters and opening a window which anyone could see is a nonsensical theory if you had a KEY.

Not if you didn't want anyone to know you had a key.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Was stranger abduction unlikely due to the checking regime?
« Reply #307 on: March 06, 2017, 05:05:35 AM »
Not if you didn't want anyone to know you had a key.
That could be an important issue.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Lace

Re: Was stranger abduction unlikely due to the checking regime?
« Reply #308 on: March 06, 2017, 09:55:08 AM »
What if Smithman was indeed just another tourist and the abductor snatched Madeleine just before Kate did her check?   He could have opened the window as a precaution in case he was cornered and having opened it just before Kate checked no one would have noticed it open when passing,   the apartment wouldn't have been too cold either for the twins to wake up.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Was stranger abduction unlikely due to the checking regime?
« Reply #309 on: March 06, 2017, 09:58:06 AM »
What if Smithman was indeed just another tourist and the abductor snatched Madeleine just before Kate did her check?   He could have opened the window as a precaution in case he was cornered and having opened it just before Kate checked no one would have noticed it open when passing,   the apartment wouldn't have been too cold either for the twins to wake up.

We have been told not to post opinion as fact Lace.

An 'abductor' is not a fact.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Was stranger abduction unlikely due to the checking regime?
« Reply #310 on: March 06, 2017, 10:21:51 AM »
We have been told not to post opinion as fact Lace.

An 'abductor' is not a fact.
Lace doesn't claim it was a fact.  It was simply a proposal. a "what if".
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Was stranger abduction unlikely due to the checking regime?
« Reply #311 on: March 06, 2017, 10:27:10 AM »
Lace doesn't claim it was a fact.  It was simply a proposal. a "what if".

Read again.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Was stranger abduction unlikely due to the checking regime?
« Reply #312 on: March 06, 2017, 10:30:32 AM »
Read again.
"What if" and "could have"; the post is not describing a fact but a hypothetical scenario.
« Last Edit: March 06, 2017, 10:34:51 AM by Robittybob1 »
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Was stranger abduction unlikely due to the checking regime?
« Reply #313 on: March 06, 2017, 10:58:20 AM »
"What if" and "could have"; the post is not describing a fact but a hypothetical scenario.

The 'what if' is in connection to Smithman. The 'could have in in connection to the abductor's actions, not his existence.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Was stranger abduction unlikely due to the checking regime?
« Reply #314 on: March 06, 2017, 11:08:01 AM »
Incorrect.
Lace asked: "What if Smithman was indeed just another tourist and the abductor snatched Madeleine just before Kate did her check?"  That "what if" applies to both statements
"What if Smithman was indeed just another tourist"  and what if the abductor snatched Madeleine just before Kate did her check?"
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.