Goncalo Amaral interviewed after the Appeal Court decision.

[Robittybob1]

I found the interview to be very interesting. This was before SC RULING.  It really is incredible that many Portuguese feel aggrieved that the parents were let off lightly by not being arrested and charged with abandonment or something. Also the same is felt here by many , they(McCs) just walked right out of a really nasty situation and went on the defencive as many of their supporters continue to do.

oh aw they made a mistake?

But didn't the documentary also say it wasn't only the McCanns who did this to their kids.  They would have had to charge all 4 families with the same crime, something that was fairly common practice at the tourist resort according to Gerry.

[Mr Gray]

Rob, what Amaral refers to as the 'preliminary report' is actually an email sent by John Low to Stuart Prior, in which he explained one result (the result from the boot) and explained why a mixed result from a number of people (John Lowe wasn't able to determine exactly how many) bore some characteristics comparable with characteristics from the DNA of Madeleine

I think it may have come from here...from amarals tv documentary....

Duarte Levy
Journalist

30.32 – For the ‘Times’, we – I say ‘we’ because I worked with Paulo Reis and David Brown – the first article that we wrote was about the blood traces that had been found on the apartment’s wall, and we published that the blood was not Madeleine’s. It was an article that raised some problems, in terms of the FSS’s organisation, but that didn’t prevent us from accessing other preliminary and final reports. At a given time, we had access to a report that was signed by more than ten FSS professionals, which stated the existence of a correspondence of 17 out of 19 alleles in the case of Madeleine McCann. To us, there was more than enough data to state that this was Madeleine’s blood.

[Robittybob1]

Rob, what Amaral refers to as the 'preliminary report' is actually an email sent by John Low to Stuart Prior, in which he explained one result (the result from the boot) and explained why a mixed result from a number of people (John Lowe wasn't able to determine exactly how many) bore some characteristics comparable with characteristics from the DNA of Madeleine

Sorry I missed your post earlier.  So it is in the file, but it doesn't read like what Amaral made out.  I'll check it out later thanks.

[Robittybob1]

I think it may have come from here...from amarals tv documentary....

Duarte Levy
Journalist

30.32 – For the ‘Times’, we – I say ‘we’ because I worked with Paulo Reis and David Brown – the first article that we wrote was about the blood traces that had been found on the apartment’s wall, and we published that the blood was not Madeleine’s. It was an article that raised some problems, in terms of the FSS’s organisation, but that didn’t prevent us from accessing other preliminary and final reports. At a given time, we had access to a report that was signed by more than ten FSS professionals, which stated the existence of a correspondence of 17 out of 19 alleles in the case of Madeleine McCann. To us, there was more than enough data to state that this was Madeleine’s blood.

Interesting it has gone up to 17 out of 19 now from the report 15 out of 19 alleles.  The thing is it it was clearly a mixed sample with 3 -5 peoples DNA all mixed.

[ShiningInLuz]

It is not the same case, and shows the mischief the Portuguese were trying to cause when they released documents like that into the public arena but kept many other documents completely secret.  It is a complete conspiracy to cause trouble IMO.

With all due respects, rubbish.  There are laws in Portugal re what is released into the public domain and what is not.  They followed the law.

[Robittybob1]

With all due respects, rubbish.  There are laws in Portugal re what is released into the public domain and what is not.  They followed the law.

Can you show me that law and how it relates to an archived case please?

[ShiningInLuz]

Can you show me that law and how it relates to an archived case please?

I believe the archiving report covers what could and could not be released.  However you have impugned the Portuguese authorities with "shows the mischief the Portuguese were trying to cause" so it is up to you to provide evidence supporting this nonsense.

[Mr Gray]

I believe the archiving report covers what could and could not be released.  However you have impugned the Portuguese authorities with "shows the mischief the Portuguese were trying to cause" so it is up to you to provide evidence supporting this nonsense.

I would say criticising teh McCanns for not demonstrating their innocence  is a good example

[ShiningInLuz]

I would say criticising teh McCanns for not demonstrating their innocence  is a good example

I take it you mean a reconstruction was not possible because the T9 refused?

[G-Unit]

But didn't the documentary also say it wasn't only the McCanns who did this to their kids.  They would have had to charge all 4 families with the same crime, something that was fairly common practice at the tourist resort according to Gerry.

I think you'll struggle to find a cite showing Gerry saying that.

[Alfie]

I take it you mean a reconstruction was not possible because the T9 refused?

Here's the perfect opportunity for you to explain to us lesser mortals how a reconstruction would have demonstrated the McCanns' innocence.  Over to you.

[Mr Gray]

I take it you mean a reconstruction was not possible because the T9 refused?

Their words were "failed to demonstrate their innocence"....which is a disgrace...its up to the police to find evidence of guilt .....the mccanns could not refuse to attend  a reconstruction....they were not asked to....but I doubt you are aware of that

[Robittybob1]

I believe the archiving report covers what could and could not be released.  However you have impugned the Portuguese authorities with "shows the mischief the Portuguese were trying to cause" so it is up to you to provide evidence supporting this nonsense.

That would be a great topic for a new thread.  It is definitely "a truth" when truth is used as a word as did GA (like it doesn't mean it is a fact but an interpretation of the facts and that truth can still be open to alternatives.

So you reckon in the archiving report it will explain as to why the Gaspar statements were released yet others were retained.

[Robittybob1]

I take it you mean a reconstruction was not possible because the T9 refused?

Were all of the T9 asked to attend? 

[Robittybob1]

I think you'll struggle to find a cite showing Gerry saying that.

What were the words "hundreds of letters of support for those who had or would do the same"  I've heard it many times.