Goncalo Amaral interviewed after the Appeal Court decision.

[slartibartfast]

as no noe has accused her of anything she has not had reason to say anything...she was a suspect and she has not been officialy cleared

But that is the difference. It had been claimed that the McCanns had been cleared which was not the case.

[Miss Taken Identity]

the parents are not suspects according to SY...fact

which fact would this be?

What crime is it exactly they are not suspects in? and based on what evidence is DCI talking about?

Now then it is a bit silly to establish constrains on an 'investigation' when you tell everyone you are going 'back to the begining' One has to wonder which begining were they talking about?

[Mr Gray]

which fact would this be?

What crime is it exactly they are not suspects in? and based on what evidence is DCI talking about?

Now then it is a bit silly to establish constrains on an 'investigation' when you tell everyone you are going 'back to the begining' One has to wonder which begining were they talking about?

you would have to know when the decision was taken to investigate an abduction...the remit emerged some 6 months agter the start of the review so i would say the mccanns were investigated...you might disagree

[Mr Gray]

But that is the difference. It had been claimed that the McCanns had been cleared which was not the case.

depends what they mean by cleared there is no precise definition

[Miss Taken Identity]

you would have to know when the decision was taken to investigate an abduction...the remit emerged some 6 months agter the start of the review so i would say the mccanns were investigated...you might disagree

I can't agree or disagree on  someones guestimate now can I?  Based on information from a very senior Police officer in the UK. No police investigaiton would rule in or rule out anyone until the investigation was complete, ofcourse he may be lying to me...

[Mr Gray]

I can't agree or disagree on  someones guestimate now can I?  Based on information from a very senior Police officer in the UK. No police investigaiton would rule in or rule out anyone until the investigation was complete, ofcourse he may be lying to me...

what very senior police officer LOL

[slartibartfast]

Nice description.  I trust we may also refer to you in the same fashion as a supporter of Amaral?  No, thought not.

Why? This obsession that all sceptics support Amaral is a bit bizarre.

[Alfie]

Why? This obsession that all sceptics support Amaral is a bit bizarre.

Amaral, dogs, Grime, whatever - my point was the words used to describe McCann supporters - is it OK to use this phrase to describe you or Miss Taken or are you going to get off YOUR backside and delete the offensive comments? 

[slartibartfast]

Amaral, dogs, Grime, whatever - my point was the words used to describe McCann supporters - is it OK to use this phrase to describe you or Miss Taken or are you going to get off YOUR backside and delete the offensive comments?

No and no. I would assume you don't consider yourself a baying fang flashing supporter who froths at the mouth.

[Alfie]

No and no. I would assume you don't consider yourself a baying fang flashing supporter who froths at the mouth.

You seem to have a problem understanding today. 
Davel asked Miss Taken to name a police officer that she claims told her something
She then replied:
"Naming names is not my style, especially to the baying, fang flashing, supporters who froth at the mouth when they happen to find a new 'victim' to blame for Madeleine's disappearance."
It's obvious (though clearly not to you) that she is referring to Davel, and by extension the rest of us on this forum.  What are you going to do about it?  Nothing I suppose.  I guess I will just have to report it and get a proper moderator to sort it out.

[slartibartfast]

You seem to have a problem understanding today. 
Davel asked Miss Taken to name a police officer that she claims told her something
She then replied:
"Naming names is not my style, especially to the baying, fang flashing, supporters who froth at the mouth when they happen to find a new 'victim' to blame for Madeleine's disappearance."
It's obvious (though clearly not to you) that she is referring to Davel, and by extension the rest of us on this forum.  What are you going to do about it?  Nothing I suppose.  I guess I will just have to report it and get a proper moderator to sort it out.

She refers to a subset of supporters.

[jassi]

You seem to have a problem understanding today. 
Davel asked Miss Taken to name a police officer that she claims told her something
She then replied:
"Naming names is not my style, especially to the baying, fang flashing, supporters who froth at the mouth when they happen to find a new 'victim' to blame for Madeleine's disappearance."
It's obvious (though clearly not to you) that she is referring to Davel, and by extension the rest of us on this forum.  What are you going to do about it?  Nothing I suppose.  I guess I will just have to report it and get a proper moderator to sort it out.

Whatever for ?

[Brietta]

What is the forensic test for abduction?

If there is no evidence of "woke and wandered" I would imagine that a missing child might be an indication of abduction.

[Brietta]

Again dave.

People did not need Amaral to consider accidental death as a scenario.

Try remembering that, it would help.

Usually in cases of accidental death remains are found at the scene.

[Alfie]

She refers to a subset of supporters.

so in your opinion she is not trying to be in any way insulting or goading to Davel, or other supporters on here, is that your belief?