Author Topic: Maddie detectives seeking resort worker.  (Read 34635 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Maddie detectives seeking resort worker.
« Reply #45 on: March 16, 2017, 07:41:24 AM »
Brietta has , as have other mods, said to stop typing opinions as fact.

Abduction is an opinion.
Abduction is an option not an opinion.  To make matters worse it is the preferred option by Operation Grange (OG).
« Last Edit: March 16, 2017, 07:43:50 AM by Robittybob1 »
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Maddie detectives seeking resort worker.
« Reply #46 on: March 16, 2017, 07:50:18 AM »
Abduction is an option not an opinion.  To make matters worse it is the preferred option by Operation Grange (OG).

It remains an opinion, unsupported by any substantial evidence.

I presume you are aware of Moita Flores view on this, and he was involved in the initial investigation ?

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Maddie detectives seeking resort worker.
« Reply #47 on: March 16, 2017, 07:53:32 AM »
It remains an opinion, unsupported by any substantial evidence.

I presume you are aware of Moita Flores view on this, and he was involved in the initial investigation ?
His opinion is just an opinion.  He is another who think that because  Goncalo won his case he is right about the scenario he proposed as part of his thesis, but the judges make it clear they are not making a determination  on what happened.
« Last Edit: March 16, 2017, 07:56:52 AM by Robittybob1 »
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Maddie detectives seeking resort worker.
« Reply #48 on: March 16, 2017, 07:54:19 AM »
His opinion is just an opinion.

You have double standards.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Maddie detectives seeking resort worker.
« Reply #49 on: March 16, 2017, 07:59:47 AM »
You have double standards.
No I haven't.  You can list options but you have only one opinion.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Maddie detectives seeking resort worker.
« Reply #50 on: March 16, 2017, 08:01:07 AM »
Do you think that because  Goncalo won his case he is right about the scenario he proposed as part of his thesis?
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Maddie detectives seeking resort worker.
« Reply #51 on: March 16, 2017, 08:01:19 AM »
There are many opinions but the only one that matters is the investigating police force
Is
SY
Who are looking for an abductor

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Maddie detectives seeking resort worker.
« Reply #52 on: March 16, 2017, 08:04:39 AM »
There are many opinions but the only one that matters is the investigating police force
Is
SY
Who are looking for an abductor

You can only find evidence if it exists. 8(0(*

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Maddie detectives seeking resort worker.
« Reply #53 on: March 16, 2017, 08:06:50 AM »
There are many opinions but the only one that matters is the investigating police force
Is
SY
Who are looking for an abductor
That is their preferred option but in my opinion it is still the wrong one (not as a burglary gone wrong).

You can only find evidence if it exists. 8(0(*
So you have to look in the right place. 
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Alfie

  • Guest
Re: Maddie detectives seeking resort worker.
« Reply #54 on: March 16, 2017, 08:17:20 AM »
I have never seen it revealed before that there was a burglary around noon on the day that Madeleine disappeared.  But it is a big step from a nicking a bit of tourist tat to kidnapping a child don't you think?

The coincidence is in the day but little else imo.  Certainly the Portuguese police have shown little interest in this petty burglar.
As I have already pointed out, the report does clearly state that the Met don't suspect him of kidnapping Madeleine himself, did you miss that bit?

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Maddie detectives seeking resort worker.
« Reply #55 on: March 16, 2017, 08:19:39 AM »
That is their preferred option but in my opinion it is still the wrong one (not as a burglary gone wrong).
 So you have to look in the right place.

..and your opinion is based on what exactly ?

How do you know evidence of abduction exists ?

You know of course, if there is none, what that means ?

Offline G-Unit

Re: Maddie detectives seeking resort worker.
« Reply #56 on: March 16, 2017, 08:56:10 AM »
There are many opinions but the only one that matters is the investigating police force
Is
SY
Who are looking for an abductor

They are not the only ones that matter because they are not able to act without the help and co-operation of the Portuguese. OG can think whatever they like, it doesn't mean their thinking is correct. The Met are not infallible as we have seen on numerous occasions.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Maddie detectives seeking resort worker.
« Reply #57 on: March 16, 2017, 09:19:22 AM »
They are not the only ones that matter because they are not able to act without the help and co-operation of the Portuguese. OG can think whatever they like, it doesn't mean their thinking is correct. The Met are not infallible as we have seen on numerous occasions.

they are the only ones taht matter because they are the only ones investigating and it is crystal clear they are not investigating the mccanns. Should they find evidence then the pj will have no choice but to act on it
« Last Edit: March 16, 2017, 09:47:58 AM by davel »

Offline G-Unit

Re: Maddie detectives seeking resort worker.
« Reply #58 on: March 16, 2017, 09:30:40 AM »
they are yje only ones taht amtter because tehy are teh only ones investigating and it is crystal clear they are not investigating teh mccanns. Should they find evidence then the pj will have no choice but to act on it

You know the PJ are not investigating then? How do you know that? The PJ don't have to act on anything unless the judiciary, having evaluated any evidence offered by OG, tell them to. The judiciary will also decide whether any evidence is sufficient to justify bringing any charges. Much as you would like the Met to be in charge, they're not.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Maddie detectives seeking resort worker.
« Reply #59 on: March 16, 2017, 09:35:38 AM »
they are yje only ones taht amtter because tehy are teh only ones investigating and it is crystal clear they are not investigating teh mccanns. Should they find evidence then the pj will have no choice but to act on it




...and on and on and on......................

Without finding anything.